By Philip Giraldi
The Biden
Administration is now preparing to
go after the people that it objects
to and will create new laws as
necessary to do so.
March 12, 2021 "Information
Clearing House" - -
"SCF"
- "
The claim is often made that
President George W. Bush’s war on terror,
which produced legislation that was employed
to attack Iraq in 2003, eventually morphed
into the worst foreign policy mistake in
U.S. history when that conflict destabilized
the entire region and led to an American
multifront military engagement that now
appears permanent. Few of those in the
policymaking business appreciated that by
turning “terrorism” into an especially
invidious form of evil allowing governments
to arrest or even assassinate without due
process and bomb civilians if they fit a
profile, Pandora’s box was being opened to
expand that authority to commit other
heinous abuses of authority.
Jim Bovard
has described how post 9/11 there were
hundreds of arrests for no good reason, in
some cases only because someone had a name
or countenance that appeared to be “Arabic.”
Congressman Ron Paul and a handful of others
observed at the time that the legislation
would inevitably be used against domestic
enemies of the state as well as against
foreign or foreign-linked groups, meaning
that the real damage done by the Patriot
Act, the Authorization to Use Military Force
(AUMF) and the Military Commissions Act
would be felt somewhere down the road,
possibly at a point where the original
objective of the legislation would be more
or less forgotten.
Now that we have an identified “domestic
terror” problem one should expect at a
minimum a massive increase in surveillance
of innocent citizens couple with arbitrary
arrests and incarcerations. Indeed, the
process is already well underway with FBI
Director Christopher Wray
announcing that there are several
thousand terror “cases” under development.
There will also be increasing calls to take
away guns and to control what is allowed to
appear on the internet. Soon Americans will
have nothing to measure their remaining
liberties by and will be less free to
exercise rights including free speech,
possibly dramatically so.
No Advertising - No Government
Grants - This Is Independent Media
So now we have reached a point where we
have a government that is committed to
further reducing one’s rights in order to
“keep us safe” from a domestic threat and
congress critters are openly speaking of
bringing in “war on terror” type expedients
to make sure that they have the tools
available to do just that. The Joe Biden
White House has made clear that it has
embraced fighting domestic terrorists as a
top priority. Last week, the Administration
sought authorization from the Pentagon
to keep thousands of national guard troops
in the District of Columbia for 60 days
more, presumably to protect the government
buildings and staff. The pretext for the
continued presence was a vaguely described
plot constituting a “potential threat” to
overrun the Capitol building on March 4th,
a day when it was apparently anticipated
that Donald Trump would miraculously be
returned to office. The House of
Representatives even canceled a session over
concerns that they were about to be invaded
by a hostile “militia.” Just how “real” the
threat was has not been made clear beyond
suggestions of “chatter” over the internet,
nor has there been any explanation of why
the 2,200 strong Capitol Police force is
unable to deal with the problem.
Be that as it may, the Biden
Administration thinks it knows exactly who
the enemy is. The government already has a
working definition of a domestic terrorist,
i.e. “If you advocate violence as a tool to
further political ends, and take concrete
steps to do that, you’re a terrorist.” But
if you thought that included groups like
Antifa and Black Lives Matter (BLM) you
would be wrong. For the Biden Administration
it is the stereotyped right-wing extremist,
who, among other attributes, is represented
by the media and government as coming from
the class that Hillary Clinton once
described as “deplorables.”
The accepted definition of the enemy
defies logic as the rioting, arson, and
killing that has taken place over the past
year has generally been inspired by Antifa
and BLM, resulting in major damage and
destruction in various cities and states.
But the mobs who wrecked and looted have
been mostly set free by the courts in the
Democratic Party dominated cities. In
Portland Oregon 90% of the rioters were not
prosecuted, presumably because the local
judicial system believed that their “cause
was just.” Against that is the trauma of the
January 6th incident at the
Capitol, much smaller in scope and damages
but obviously terrifying to the media and
Congress. Also what did occur bore a more
comfortable theme for the Democrats which
they have been beating to death ever since –
“insurrection caused by right wing
extremists who were overwhelmingly white and
support Donald Trump.” That’s apparently all
one needs to initiate a campaign to get rid
of such dissidents.
For some suggestions about the direction
the Biden Administration will be going in to
eliminate domestic terrorism, one only has
to review the comments of Attorney General
nominee Merrick Garland at his Senate
confirmation hearing on February 22nd,
where he declared that going after domestic
terrorists would be a top administration
priority. When
asked if he regards the numerous
attempts by Antifa and BLM rioters to
destroy federal courthouses in Portland and
Seattle as acts of domestic extremism or
terrorism, he hedged on the issue and
replied:
“So an attack on a courthouse while in
operation, trying to prevent judges from
actually deciding cases, that plainly is,
uhm, domestic extremism, uhm, domestic
terrorism. An attack simply on a government
property at night…or any other kind of
circumstances, is a clear crime and a
serious one and should be punished. I don’t
mean…I don’t know enough about the facts of
the example you’re talking about, but that’s
where I draw the line. One is…both are
criminal, but one is a core attack on our
democratic institutions.”
According to the man who almost became a
Supreme Court Justice and now appears to be
on his way to becoming Attorney General if
you attack and seek to destroy a government
building when there is no one in it is a
different level of criminality than seeking
to disrupt what is going on inside during
business hours. It clearly is a fine line,
or at least Garland sees it that way, but in
either case you are making the building
non-functional in terms of its intended use.
Indeed, groups like BLM have regularly
condemned the criminal justice system and if
you burn the building down it will be
unusable for a long, long time. So clearly
what makes something “terrorism” as opposed
to only “criminality” is the expectation
based on the events of 1/6 that it will be
right-wing whites who will be doing the
disruption. They are the terrorists.
So, it seems pretty clear that the Biden
Administration is now preparing to go after
the people that it objects to and will
create new laws as necessary to do so.
Garland will certainly have a hand in that
development. And if anyone is thinking of
leaving all of this behind by fleeing to
another country where there is an actual
rule of law, it would be best to consider
the matter again. On February 22nd,
United Nations Secretary-General Antonio
Guterres
warned that white supremacy right-wing
nationalist movements have become a
“transnational threat” that has exploited
the fear of the coronavirus pandemic to gain
support. He said that “White supremacy and
neo-Nazi movements are more than domestic
terror threats. They are becoming a
transnational threat. Today, these extremist
movements represent the number one internal
security threat in several countries. Far
too often, these hate groups are cheered on
by people in positions of responsibility in
ways that were considered unimaginable not
long ago. We need global coordinated action
to defeat this grave and growing danger.”
It means you can run but you can’t hide.
It looks like there will be a worldwide
coalition to extirpate the evils that come
automatically with whiteness and, as BLM is
now de facto a major constituency
of the U.S. Democratic Party, you know that
Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi will be leading
the charge.