By Edward Curtin
February 16, 2021 "Information
Clearing House" - - “The CIA and the
media are part of the same criminal conspiracy,”
wrote Douglas Valentine in his important book,
The CIA As Organized Crime.
This is true. The corporate mainstream media are
stenographers for the national security state’s
ongoing psychological operations aimed at the
American people, just as they have done the same for
an international audience. We have long been
subjected to this “information warfare,” whose
purpose is to win the hearts and minds of the
American people and pacify them into victims of
their own complicity, just as it was practiced long
ago by the CIA in Vietnam and by The New York
Times, CBS, etc. on the American people then
and over the years as the American warfare state
waged endless wars, coups, false flag operations,
and assassinations at home and abroad.
Another way of putting this is to say for all
practical purposes when it comes to matters that
bear on important foreign and domestic matters,
the CIA and the corporate mainstream media cannot be
distinguished.
For those who read and study history, it has long
been known that the CIA has placed their operatives
throughout every agency of the U.S. government, as
explained by
Fletcher Prouty in
The Secret Team, The CIA and Its Allies in
Control of the United States and the World;
that CIA officers Cord Myer and Frank Wisner
operated secret programs to get some of the most
vocal exponents of intellectual freedom among
intellectuals, journalists, and writers to be their
voices for unfreedom and censorship, as explained by
Frances Stonor Saunders in
The Cultural Cold War and Joel Whitney
in
Finks, among others; that Cord Myer was
especially focused on and successful in “courting
the Compatible Left” since right wingers were
already in the Agency’s pocket. All this is
documented and not disputed. It is shocking only to
those who don’t do their homework and see what is
happening today outside a broad historical context.
With the rise of alternate media and a wide array
of dissenting voices on the internet, the
establishment felt threatened and went on the
defensive. It therefore should come as no surprise
that those same elite corporate media are now
leading the charge for increased censorship and the
denial of free speech to those they deem dangerous,
whether that involves wars, rigged elections,
foreign coups, COVID-19, vaccinations, or the lies
of the corporate media themselves. Having already
banned critics from writing in their pages and or
talking on their screens, these media giants want to
make the quieting of dissenting voices complete.
No Advertising - No Government
Grants - This Is Independent Media
Just the other day The New York Times
had this headline:
Robert Kennedy Jr. Barred From Instagram Over
False Virus Claims.
Notice the lack of the word alleged before “false
virus claims.” This is guilt by headline. It is a
perfect piece of propaganda posing as reporting,
since it accuses Kennedy,
a brilliant and honorable man, of falsity and
stupidity, thus justifying Instagram’s ban, and it
is an inducement to further censorship of Mr.
Kennedy by Facebook that owns Instagram. That ban
should follow soon, as the Times’ reporter
Jennifer Jett hopes, since she accusingly writes
that RFK, Jr. “makes many of the same baseless
claims to more than 300,000 followers” at Facebook.
Jett made sure her report also went to msn.com and
The Boston Globe.
This is one example of the censorship underway
with much, much more to follow. What was once done
under the cover of omission is now done openly and
brazenly, cheered on by those who, in an act of bad
faith, claim to be upholders of the First Amendment
and the importance of free debate in a democracy.
We are quickly slipping into an unreal totalitarian
social order.
Which brings me to the recent work of
Glenn
Greenwald and
Matt Taibbi, both of whom have strongly and
rightly decried this censorship. As I understand
their arguments, they go like this.
First, the corporate media have
today divided up the territory and speak only to
their own audiences in echo chambers: liberal to
liberals (read: the “allegedly” liberal Democratic
Party), such as The New York Times, NBC, etc., and
conservative to conservatives (read” the “allegedly”
conservative Donald Trump), such as Fox News,
Breitbart, etc. They have abandoned old school
journalism that, despite its shortcomings, involved
objectivity and the reporting of disparate facts and
perspectives, but within limits. Since the
digitization of news, their new business models are
geared to these separate audiences since they are
highly lucrative choices. It’s business driven since
electronic media have replaced paper as advertising
revenues have shifted and people’s ability to focus
on complicated issues has diminished drastically.
Old school journalism is suffering as a result and
thus writers such as Greenwald and Taibbi and Chris
Hedges (who interviewed Taibbi and concurs: part one
here) have taken their work to the internet to
escape such restrictive categories and the
accompanying censorship.
Secondly, the great call for
censorship is not something the Silicon Valley
companies want because they want more people using
their media since it means more money for them, but
they are being pressured to do it by the traditional
old school media, such as The New York Times,
who now employ “tattletales and censors,” people who
are power hungry jerks, to sniff out dissenting
voices that they can recommend should be banned.
Greenwald says:
They do it in part for power: to
ensure nobody but they can control the flow of
information. They do it partly for ideology and
out of hubris: the belief that their worldview
is so indisputably right that all dissent is
inherently dangerous ‘disinformation.’
Thus, the old school print and television media
are not on the same page as Facebook, Twitter, etc.
but have opposing agendas.
In short, these shifts and the censorship are
about money and power within the media world as the
business has been transformed by the digital
revolution.
I think this is a half-truth that conceals a
larger issue. The censorship is not being driven by
power hungry reporters at the Times or
CNN or any media outlet. All these media and
their employees are but the outer layer of the
onion, the means by which messages are sent and
people controlled. These companies and their
employees do what they are told, whether explicitly
or implicitly, for they know it is in their
financial interest to do so. If they do not play
their part in this twisted and intricate propaganda
game, they will suffer. They will be eliminated, as
are pesky individuals who dare peel the onion to its
core. For each media company is one part of a large
interconnected intelligence apparatus – a system, a
complex – whose purpose is power, wealth, and
domination for the very few at the expense of the
many. The CIA and media as parts of the same
criminal conspiracy.
To argue that the Silicon valley companies do not
want to censor but are being pressured by the legacy
corporate media does not make sense. These
companies are deeply connected to U.S. intelligence
agencies, as are the NY Times, CNN,
NBC, etc. They too are part of what was once
called
Operation Mockingbird, the CIA’s program to
control, use, and infiltrate the media. Only the
most naïve would think that such a program does not
exist today.
In
Surveillance Valley, investigative reporter
Yasha Levine documents how Silicon valley tech
companies like Facebook, Amazon, and Google are tied
to the military-industrial-intelligence-media
complex in surveillance and censorship; how the
Internet was created by the Pentagon; and even how
these shadowy players are deeply involved in the
so-called privacy movement that developed after
Edward Snowden’s revelations. Like Valentine, and
in very detailed ways, Levine shows how the
military-industrial-intelligence-digital-media
complex is part of the same criminal conspiracy as
is the traditional media with their CIA overlords.
It is one club.
Many people, however, might find this hard to
believe because it bursts so many bubbles, including
the one that claims that these tech companies are
pressured into censorship by the likes of The
New York Times, etc. The truth is the Internet
was a military and intelligence tool from the very
beginning and it is not the traditional corporate
media that gives it its marching orders.
That being so, it is not the owners of the
corporate media or their employees who are the
ultimate controllers behind the current vast
crackdown on dissent, but the intelligence agencies
who control the mainstream media and
the Silicon valley monopolies such as
Facebook, Twitter, Google, etc. All these media
companies are but the outer layer of the onion, the
means by which messages are sent and people
controlled.
But for whom do these intelligence agencies
work? Not for themselves.
They work for their overlords, the super wealthy
people, the banks, financial institutions, and
corporations that own the United States and always
have. In a simple twist of fate, such super wealthy
naturally own the media corporations that are
essential to their control of the majority of the
world’s wealth through the stories they tell. It is
a symbiotic relationship. As
FDR put it bluntly in 1933, this coterie of
wealthy forces is the “financial element in the
larger centers [that] has owned the Government ever
since the days of Andrew Jackson.” Their wealth
and power has increased exponentially since then,
and their connected tentacles have further spread to
create what is an international deep state that
involves such entities as the IMF, the World Bank,
the World Economic Forum, those
who meet yearly at Davos, etc. They are the
international overlords who are pushing hard to
move the world toward a global dictatorship.
As is well known, or should be, the CIA was the
creation of Wall St. and serves the interests of the
wealthy owners. Peter Dale Scott, in “The
State, the Deep State, and the Wall Street Overworld,”
says of Allen Dulles, the nefarious longest running
Director of the CIA and Wall St. lawyer for Sullivan
and Cromwell:
There seems to be little
difference in Allen Dulles’s influence whether
he was a Wall Street lawyer or a CIA director.
It was Dulles, long connected to Rockefeller’s
Standard Oil, international corporations, and a
friend of Nazi agents and scientists, who was tasked
with
drawing up proposals for the CIA. He was ably
assisted by five Wall St. bankers or investors,
including the aforementioned
Frank Wisner who later, as a CIA officer, said
his “Mighty
Wurlitzer” was “capable of playing any
propaganda tune he desired.” This he did by
recruiting intellectuals, writers, reporters, labor
organizations, and the mainstream corporate media,
etc. to propagate the CIA’s messages.
Greenwald, Taibbi, and Hedges are correct up to a
point, but they stop short. Their critique of old
school journalism à la Edward Herman’s and Noam
Chomsky’s Manufacturing of Consent model,
while true as far as it goes, fails to pin the tail
on the real donkey. Like old school journalists who
knew implicitly how far they could go, these guys
know it too, as if there is an invisible electronic
gate that keeps them from wandering into dangerous
territory.
The censorship of Robert Kennedy, Jr. is an
exemplary case. His banishment from Instagram and
the ridicule the mainstream media have heaped upon
him for years is not simply because
he raises deeply informed questions about vaccines,
Bill Gates, the pharmaceutical companies, etc.
His critiques suggest something far more dangerous
is afoot: the demise of democracy and the
rise of a totalitarian order that involves
total surveillance, control,
eugenics, etc. by the wealthy led by their
intelligence propagandists.
To call him a super spreader of hoaxes and a
conspiracy theorist is aimed at not only silencing
him on specific medical issues, but to silence
his powerful and articulate voice on all issues.
To give thoughtful consideration to his deeply
informed scientific thinking concerning vaccines,
the World Health Organization, the Bill and Melinda
Gates Foundation, etc., is to open a can of worms
that the powerful want shut tight.
This is because RFK, Jr. is also a severe critic
of the enormous power of the CIA and its propaganda
that goes back so many decades and was used to cover
up the national security state’s assassinations of
his father and
uncle, JFK. It is why his wonderful recent book,
American Values: Lessons I Learned from My Family,
that contains not one word about vaccines,
was shunned by mainstream book reviewers; for
the picture he paints fiercely indicts the CIA in
multiple ways while also indicting the mass media
that have been its mouthpieces. These worms must be
kept in the can, just as the power of the
international overlords represented by the World
Health Organization and the
World Economic Forum with its
Great Reset must be. They must be dismissed as
crackpot conspiracy theories not worthy of debate or
exposure.
Robert Kennedy, Jr., by name and dedication to
truth seeking, conjures up his father’s ghost, the
last politician who, because of his vast support
across racial and class divides, could have united
the country and tamed the power of the CIA to
control the narrative that has allowed for
the
plundering of the world and the country for the
wealthy overlords.
So they killed him.
There is a reason Noam Chomsky is an exemplar for
Hedges, Greenwald, and Taibbi. He controls the can
opener for so many. He has set the parameters for
what is considered acceptable to be considered a
serious journalist or intellectual. The
assassinations of the Kennedys, 9/11, or a
questioning of the official Covid-19 story are not
among them, and so they are eschewed.
To denounce censorship, as they have done, is
admirable. But now Greenwald, Taibbi, and Hedges
need go up to the forbidden gate with the sign that
says – “This far and no further” – and jump over
it. That’s where the true stories lie. That’s when
they’ll see the worms squirm.
Edward Curtin is an
independent writer whose work has appeared
widely over many years. His website is
edwardcurtin.com
and his new book is
Seeking Truth in a Country of
Lies