JCPOA forbade any metallurgy, but Iran's work isn't
weapons-related
By Jason Ditz
February 11, 2021 "Information
Clearing House" - Recent focus on Iran’s
civilian nuclear program has been centered on them
producing uranium metal, which is being done in
spite of warnings from other parties to the nuclear
deal that the deal forbids them from doing so.
The clause in the deal specific to this is that
“Iran will not engage in activities, including at
the R&D level, that could contribute to the
development of a nuclear explosive device, including
uranium or plutonium metallurgy activities.”
As is so often the case, this is where we get into
arguments about technicalities. Iran’s metallurgy is
of uranium far below weapons-grade, and could
therefore be argued as not contributing to the
development of a nuclear explosive device.
More specifically, Iran is turning 20% enriched
uranium into uranium oxide fuel plates for the
Tehran Research Reactor (TRR). Iran wasn’t, under
JCPOA, supposed to have to do this themselves, with
the deal specifically promising to let them buy the
fuel at market prices in return for 3.6% enriched
uranium.
No Advertising - No Government
Grants
- This Is Independent Media
Nothing is ever that easy for Iran, however, and
since the US pulled out of the JCPOA, Iran has not
had access to the market to buy or sell in ways the
deal promised. As with the years leading up to JCPOA,
Iran went back to making their own, because they
didn’t have any alternative.
As with a lot of the “violations” Iran is accused
of, it really boils down to the JCPOA having a
mechanism to avoid it, and the mechanism flat out
not working. This is similarly how Iran’s uranium
and heavy water stockpiles grew beyond their caps,
because no one would buy them as promised.
Instead of recognizing the system’s struggles, which
almost all originate in the US not honoring its part
of the deal, most nations just browbeat Iran, and
demand they take non-specific action to get back in
technical compliance with an impossible situation.
The uranium metal hits this very specific issue
because Iran was never meant to have to make metal
fuel plates, and the Tehran Research Reactor (TRR)
was meant to be replaced with an alternative, modern
design using heavy water, which also never happened.
The TRR, built by the US in the 1960’s, is the sole
source of medical isotopes for the entire country,
and while it’s long past its expected lifespan, Iran
hasn’t been able to get an alternative in place.
Iran originally tried to build a reactor in Arak,
with help from a Russian company. The company was
scared off by US pressure, and Iran finished the
design, planning for it to go into production in
2014.
The US didn’t like the design of the IR-40 reactor,
however, and JCPOA demanded a redesign, with
assistance from the other parties. In 2016 Iran
removed the IR-40’s core, pending redesign. Iran is
still waiting on that.
The Arak farce is another case of Iran not being
able to satisfy anyone. Because everyone was making
a fuss at the TRR using 20% enriched uranium, IR-40
was designed to use unenriched uranium. Then the
objection was byproducts, leading to the then
director of the IAEA suggesting a redesign that used
enriched uranium instead. The most recent talk was
that Iran would export all the waste, and China
would redesign it to produce more acceptable waste.
Until a redesign, however, Iran is stuck with the
TRR, and objections about 20% uranium, and metal
fuel plates.
Jason Ditz is news editor of Antiwar.com.
View all posts by Jason Ditz -
"Source"
-
Registration is necessary to post comments.
We ask only that you do not use obscene or offensive
language. Please be respectful of others.