Poisoning Nord Stream-2
By Finian Cunningham
September 04, 2020 "Information
Clearing House" -
As in most criminal cases, the objective soon
emerges to betray motive and perpetrator. And as
always the question of who gains is a reliable
guide to an investigation.
This week, German authorities are dramatically
accusing the Russian government over the alleged
poisoning of dissident figure Alexei Navalny who
is reportedly still in a coma in a Berlin
hospital. Days after Navalny was airlifted to
Berlin from Russia last weekend, a German
military laboratory claims to have found traces
of deadly nerve agent Novichok in his body.
Now on the back of unproven criminal allegations
against Moscow, it
emerges that German Chancellor Angela Merkel
is under renewed pressure to abandon the Nord
Stream-2 gas project with Russia.
Senior German lawmakers within Merkel’s
governing party
are calling for Berlin to ditch the ambitious
energy project in retaliation for Navalny's
"attempted murder". Significantly, these German
lawmakers like Norbert Röttgen have been
long-time opponents of the Nord Stream-2
pipeline.
The Trump administration and the US Congress
have been intensifying political efforts to
derail the $11-billion undersea gas pipeline
which is more than 90 per cent completed.
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said recently
that
the US "will do everything" to stop the project
being finished.
No Advertising - No Government Grants - This Is Independent Media
|
Nord Stream-2 is set to double Russian gas supply
to Germany. It is a huge strategic deal. Washington
has made no secret of its desire to axe the project,
having designs to sell its own more expensive gas to
the continent of Europe.
Pro-Washington politicians in Germany, Poland and
the Baltic states have been lobbying aggressively
against energy trade with Russia, due in part to
their congenital Russophobia as well as no doubt due
to sinecures and sweeteners from Uncle Sam.
The Navalny case comes at an opportune time. Last
week, Chancellor Merkel was insisting that Navalny’s
illness did not impinge on the economic matter of
Nord Stream-2. Then this week, German military
intelligence announce
they have "unequivocal proof" that Navalny was
poisoned with Novichok, a Soviet-era chemical
weapon. Now in a blizzard of accusations, the finger
of blame is being jabbed at the Kremlin.
And most tellingly, the biggest political
repercussion is the peremptory demand for Merkel to
abandon Nord Stream-2.
Let's put events in perspective. When Navalny
became ill on a flight to Moscow from Siberia on
August 20, the Russian doctors treating him found no
traces of poisons in his body, and specifically not
organophosphate-type nerve agents, such as Novichok.
The Russians assessed that Navalny’s illness was due
to a metabolic disorder such as extremely low blood
sugar, which would not be implausible if he
reportedly suffers from diabetes.
The German medics who treated Navalny when he was
flown to Berlin on August 22 also
did not detect specific poison agents. They did
claim to test positive for cholinesterase inhibitors
which replicated what their Russian counterparts had
found.
But unlike the Russians who attributed the
substances to a wide range of possible legal
pharmaceutical drugs, the Berlin medics made the
dramatic assertion that they believed a nerve poison
was involved.
That initial German claim then appears to have
been "confirmed" several days later by a Bundeswehr
laboratory which asserts that it detected Novichok
in Navalny's body.
So, either the Russian doctors are telling the
truth or the Germans are, having reached radically
different conclusions. However, a telling question
is why are the Germans not providing the biological
samples they claim to have tested positive for
Novichok? The Russian medics say they have the
original biological samples which, they say, show no
traces of nerve poison. Surely, the dispute could be
independently resolved if both sides cooperate.
But that's just it. The German side has refused,
pointedly, to engage with the Russian doctors or
state prosecutors to establish the cause of
Navalny's apparent illness. Instead,
Berlin has rushed to make grave allegations against
Moscow along with its Western allies as if in a
pre-determined response aimed at incrimination.
Without providing a chain of custody for its
sample evidence purportedly showing the use of
Novichok against Navalny, then all accusations made
by Berlin are null and void, failing basic standards
of the due legal process. The onus is on Berlin to
substantiate, not on Moscow to answer questions
based on innuendo and prejudice.
At this stage in the strange affair the biggest
question of who gains points to those politicians on
both sides of the Atlantic who have been clamouring
to sabotage the Nord Stream-2 gas project.
You fly an "opposition figure" exalted by Western
media to Berlin whose body does not initially show
traces of poison. Thereafter German military lab
tests "find" traces of deadly nerve agent. And there
then follows a predictable cacophony to cancel
energy trade with Russia. The poison plot seems
obvious, and it’s not authored by Moscow.
Finian Cunningham has written
extensively on international affairs, with articles
published in several languages. He is a Master’s
graduate in Agricultural Chemistry and worked as a
scientific editor for the Royal Society of
Chemistry, Cambridge, England, before pursuing a
career in newspaper journalism. He is also a
musician and songwriter. For nearly 20 years, he
worked as an editor and writer in major news media
organisations, including The Mirror, Irish Times and
Independent. - "Source"
-
Post your comment below