August 31, 2020 "Information
Clearing House" - It is America’s
longest overseas war and shows no clear sign of
ending despite a shaky peace deal underway between
the Trump administration and Taliban militants. A
phased withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan over
the next year could yet be derailed, resulting in
continued American military operations in the South
Asian country – nearly two decades after President
GW Bush launched Operation Enduring Freedom in
October 2001.
US involvement in Afghanistan is the archetypal
quagmire. Hundreds of thousands killed or maimed,
trillions of dollars wasted, a failed state –
despite American pretensions of nation-building, and
a militant insurgency stronger than ever.
Washington’s declared strategic objectives in
Afghanistan have never been coherent or convincing
even among Pentagon top brass. The initial
justification of “avenging terrorism of 9/11” sounds
threadbare.
The irony is that Washington first got involved
in Afghanistan back in the late 1970s to inflict a
“Vietnam scenario” on Soviet troops who were
defending an allied government in Kabul. The
Mujahideen fighters sponsored by the US and their
Taliban outgrowth have gone on to make the country
an even worse Vietnam scenario for Washington than
it intended for Moscow.
No Advertising - No Government Grants - This Is Independent Media
Afghanistan is known as the “Graveyard of Empires” where the British suffered a blow to their imperial prowess, like the Soviets and now the Americans. The question is: why are the Americans seemingly stuck in Afghanistan, unable to extricate their forces? Part of the reason no doubt stems from the bureaucracy of war and the reliable profits for the military-industrial complex which stifles a clean break from what is otherwise a futile, never-ending, dead-end conflict.
Another, perhaps more potent, reason is the
immensely lucrative business of global narcotics
trafficking. This may well be the main reason for
why the Afghan war continues despite the patent
incongruities and presidential vows to end it. It is
a vital source of finance for the CIA and other US
intelligence agencies. The big advantage from drug
business is that the finances are off the books, and
therefore not subject to Congressional oversight.
That “dark” source of income allows American
agencies to fund covert operations without ever
being held to account by prying lawmakers (if the
latter ever got around to it, that is.)
Senior Russian and Iranian officials have
recently stated that US intelligence agencies are
heavily involved in covertly transporting narcotics
out of Afghanistan.
According to Eskandar Momeni, Iran’s chief of
counter-narcotics, the production of heroin from
poppy harvests in Afghanistan has increased year
after year by 50-fold since the US forces invaded
the country. “Based on reliable information, planes
operated by NATO and the United States transport
these illicit drugs in our neighboring country,” the
official
testified this week.
Russia’s presidential envoy to Afghanistan, Zamir
Kabulov, is
quoted as saying that CIA complicity in drug
trafficking is “an open secret” in the country. “US
intelligence officers… are involved in drug
trafficking. Their planes from Kandahar, from Bagram
[airfield near Kabul] are flying wherever they want
to – to Germany, to Romania – without any
inspections,” said Kabulov.
These claims put in perspective recent
sensationalized US media
reports which quote anonymous American
intelligence sources alleging that Russian and
Iranian military personnel were running
“bounty-hunter” schemes in Afghanistan whereby
Taliban militants were supposedly paid to kill
American troops. The ropey US media reports had the
hallmark of an intelligence psychological operation.
Russia, Iran and the Taliban dismissed the
allegations. Even the Pentagon and President Trump
brushed the stories off as not credible.
But what the intended effect seems to have been
is to scupper the hesitant moves by the Trump
administration to wind down the Afghan war.
Afghanistan is the source for more than 90 per
cent of the world’s heroin supply, much of it
destined for Europe,
according to the United Nations. Some
estimates put international drug trafficking as
one of the most lucratively traded commodities, on
par with oil and gas. Financial proceeds can be
laundered through big banks as the
scandal involving British bank HSBC illustrated.
For the CIA and other US intelligence agencies,
Afghanistan is a giant money press from illicit drug
dealing. That easy source for covert funding makes
the Afghan war too addictive to kick the habit. With
its clandestine global network, fleets of private
planes, diplomatic clearance, national security
license and byzantine bank accounts all those
features make the CIA a perfect conduit for
narcotics trafficking. In addition to means, the
agency also has powerful motive for secret funding
of its other criminal enterprises: media influence
operations, color revolutions, assassinations and
regime-change subversions.
The systematic involvement of the CIA in
international drug running is as old as the agency
itself, created in 1947 at the beginning of the Cold
War. Its function of covert operations is by
definition illegal and therefore requires secret
funding. The agency has been
linked to illicit Nazi gold to fund its early
operations. Later, narcotics trafficking
entered as a crucial means for organizational
funding. The Golden Triangle in Southeast Asia was
central for sponsoring anti-communist schemes in the
1960 and 70s, as was Colombia and Central America
for funding proxy forces like the Contra in
Nicaragua during the 1980s. Afghanistan carries on
this global function for underpinning the CIA’s
criminal enterprises.
Finian Cunningham has written
extensively on international affairs, with articles
published in several languages. He is a Master’s
graduate in Agricultural Chemistry and worked as a
scientific editor for the Royal Society of
Chemistry, Cambridge, England, before pursuing a
career in newspaper journalism. He is also a
musician and songwriter. For nearly 20 years, he
worked as an editor and writer in major news media
organisations, including The Mirror, Irish Times and
Independent. - "Source"
-
The
views expressed in this article are solely those
of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
opinions of Information Clearing House.
Post your comment below
See
also
The
views expressed in this article are solely those
of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
opinions of Information Clearing House.
Search
Information Clearing House
===
The views expressed in this article are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect the opinions of Information Clearing House.
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)