Russia and the next Presidential
election in the USA
By The Saker
Intro: not a pretty
picture
July 29, 2020 "Information
Clearing House" - Let’s begin with a disclaimer: in
this article, I will assume that there will be a US
Presidential election in the Fall. Right now, it appears
to be likely that this election will take place (there
appear to be no legal way to cancel or delay it), but
this is by no means certain (see
here for a machine translated and very
interesting article by one Russian analyst, who predicts
a diarchy after the election). Right now, the state of
the US society is both extremely worried (and for good
reason) and potentially explosive. It is impossible to
predict what a well-executed false flag attack could do
to the US. There is also the possibility of either a
natural disaster (hurricane, earthquake, etc.) or even
an unnatural one (considering the condition of the US
infrastructure, this is almost inevitable) which could
precipitate some kind of state of emergency or martial
law to “protect” the people. Finally, though at this
point in time I don’t see this as very likely, there is
always the possibility of a coup of some kind, maybe a
“government of national unity” with the participation of
both parties which, as Noam Chomsky correctly points
out, are basically only two factions of what could be
called the Business Party. There might come a point when
they decide to drop this pretense too (just look at how
many other pretenses the US ruling elites have dropped
in the last decade or so).
Alexander Solzhenitsyn used to
explain that all governments can be placed on a
continuum ranging from, on one end, “states whose
power is based on their authority” to, on the other
end, “states whose authority is based on their power“.
In the real world, most states are somewhere between
these two extremes. But it is quite obvious that the US
polity currently has gone very far down the “states
whose authority is based on their power” path and
to speak of any kind of “moral authority” of US
politicians is really a joke. The (probable) upcoming
“choice” between Donald “grab them by the pussy” Trump
and Joe “creepy uncle” Biden will make this joke even
more laughable.
Right now, the most powerful
force in the US political system must be the financial
sector. And, of course, there are many other powerful
interest groups (MIC, Israel Lobby, the CIA and the
ridiculously bloated Intel community, Big Pharma, the US
Gulag, the corporate media, Oil, etc.) who all combine
their efforts (just like a vector does in mathematics)
to produce a “resulting vector” which we call “US
policies”. That is in theory. In practice, you have
several competing “policies” vying for power and
influence, both on the domestic and on international
front. Often these policies are mutually exclusive.
No Advertising - No Government Grants - This Is Independent Media
Last, but certainly not least,
the level of corruption in the US is at least as bad as,
say, in the Ukraine or in Liberia, but rather than being
on the street and petty cash level, the corruption in
the US is counted in billions of dollars.
All in all, not a pretty sight
(see
here for a good analysis of the decline of US
power).
Yet the US remains a nuclear
power and still has a lot of political influence
worldwide and thus this is not a country anyone can
ignore. Including Russia.
A quick look at Russia
Before looking into Russian
options in relation to the US, we need to take a quick
look at how Russia has been faring this year. The short
of it would be: not too well. The Russian economy has
shrunk by about 10% and the small businesses have been
devastated by the combined effects of 1) the economic
policies of the Russian government and Central Bank, and
2) the devastating economic impact of the COVID19
pandemic, and 3) the full-spectrum efforts of the West,
mostly by the Anglosphere, to strangle Russia
economically. Politically, the “Putin regime” is still
popular, but there is a sense that it is getting stale
and that most Russians would prefer to see more dynamic
and proactive policies aimed, not only to help the
Russian mega-corporations, but also to help the regular
people. Many Russians definitely have a sense that the
“little guy” is being completely ignored by fat cats in
power and this resentment will probably grow until and
unless Putin decides to finally get rid of all the
Atlantic Integrationists aka the “Washington consensus”
types which are still well represented in the Russian
ruling circles, including the government. So far, Putin
has remained faithful to his policy of compromises and
small steps, but this might change in the future as the
level of frustration in the general population is likely
to only grow with time.
That is not to say that the
Kremlin is not trying. Several of the recent
constitutional amendments adopted in a national vote had
a strongly expressed “social” and “patriotic” character
and they absolutely horrified the “liberal” 5th
columnists who tried their best two 1) call for a
boycott, and 2) denounce thousands of (almost entirely)
imaginary violations of the proper voting procedures,
and to 3) de-legitimize the outcome by declaring the
election a “fraud”. None of that worked: the
participation was high, very few actual violations were
established (and those that were, had no impact on the
outcome anyway) and most Russians accepted that this
outcome was the result of the will of the people.
Furthermore, Putin has made public the
Russian strategic goals for 2030,which are
heavily focused on improving the living and life
conditions of average Russians (for details, see
here). It is impossible to predict what will
happen next, but the most likely scenario is that Russia
has several, shall we say, “bumpy” years ahead, both on
the domestic and on the international front.
What can Russia
reasonably hope for?
This is really the key question:
in the best of situations, what can Russia really hope
for in the next elections? I would argue that there is
really very little which Russia can hope for, if only
because the russophobic hysteria started by the
Democrats to defeat Trump has now apparently been
completely endorsed by the Trump administration and the
all the members of Congress. As for the imperial
propaganda machine, it now manages to simultaneously
declare that
Russia tried to “steal” COVID vaccine secrets
from the West AND that
Russian elites were given a secret COVID vaccine
this Spring. As for the US Dems, they are already
announcing that
the Russians are spreading “disinformation” about Biden.
Talk about PRE-traumatic stress disorder (to use the
phrase coined by my friend Gilad Atzmon)…
Although I have no way of
knowing what is really taking place in the
delusional minds of US politicians, I am strongly
suspecting that the latest hysteria about “Russia
stealing COV19 vaccine secrets” is probably
triggered by the conclusion of the US intel
community that Russia will have a vaccine ready
before the US does. This is, of course, something
absolutely unthinkable for US politicians who, (sort
of) logically conclude that “if these Russkies
got a vaccine first, they *must* have stolen it from
us” or something similar (see
here for a good analysis of this). And if
the Chinese get there first, same response. After
all, who in the US legacy media would ever even
mention that Russian or Chinese researchers might be
ahead of their US colleagues? Nobody, of course.
I would argue that this mantric
Russia-bashing is something which will not change in the
foreseeable future. For one thing, since the imperial
ruling elites have clearly lost control of the
situation, they really have no other option left than to
blame it all on some external agent. The “terrorist
threat” has lost a lot of traction over the past years,
the “Muslim threat” is too politically incorrect to
openly blame it all on Islam, as for the other boogeymen
which US Americans like to scare themselves at night
with (immigrants, drug dealers, sex offenders, “domestic
terrorists”, etc.) they simply cannot be blamed for
stuff like a crashing economy. But Russia, and China,
can.
In fact, ever since the
(self-evidently ridiculous) “Skripal case” the
collective West has proven that it simply does not have
the spine to say “no”, or even “maybe”, to any thesis
energetically pushed forward by the AngloZionist
propaganda machine. Thus no matter how self-evidently
silly the imperial propaganda is, the people in the West
have been conditioned (literally) to accept any nonsense
as “highly likely” as long as it is proclaimed with
enough gravitas by politicians and their legacy
ziomedia. As for the leaders of the EU, we already know
that they will endorse any idiocy coming out of
Washington or London in the name of “solidarity”.
Truth be told, most Russian
politicians (with the notable exception of the official
Kremlin court jester, Zhirinovskii) and analysts never
saw Trump as a potential ally or friend. The Kremlin was
especially cautious, which leads me to believe that the
Russian intelligence analysts did a very good job
evaluating Trump’s psyche and they quickly figured out
that he was no better than any other US politician.
Right now, I know of no Russian analyst who would
predict that relations between the US and Russia will
improve in the foreseeable future. If anything, most are
clearly saying that “guys, we better get used to this”
(accusations, sanctions, accusations, sanctions, etc.
etc. etc.). Furthermore, it is pretty obvious to the
Russians that while Crimea and MH17 were the pretexts
for western sanctions against Russia, they were not the
real cause. The real cause of the West’s hatred for
Russia is as simple as it is old: Russia cannot be
conquered, subdued, subverted or destroyed. They’ve been
at it for close to 1,000 years and they still are at it.
In fact, each time they fail to crush Russia, their
russophobia increases to even higher levels (phobia both
in the sense of “fear” and in the sense of “hatred”).
Simply put – there is nothing
which Russia can expect from the upcoming election.
Nothing at all. Still, that does not mean that things
are not better than 4 or 8 years ago. Let’s look at what
changed.
The big difference
between now and then
What did Trump’s election give to
the world?
I would say four years for Russia
to fully prepare for what might be coming next.
I would argue that since at least
Russia and the AngloZionist Empire have been at war
since at least 2013, when Russia foiled the US plan to
attack Syria under the pretext that it was “highly
likely” that the Syrian government had used chemical
weapons against civilians (in reality, a textbook case
of a false flag organized by the Brits), This means that
Russia and the Empire have been at war since at
least 2013, for no less than seven years
(something which Russian 6th columnists and Neo-Marxists
try very hard to ignore).
True, at least until now, this
was has been 80% informational, 15% economic and only 5%
kinetic, but this is a real existential war of survival
for both sides: only one side will walk away from this
struggle. The other one will simply disappear (not as a
nation or a people, but as a polity; a regime). The
Kremlin fully understood that and it embarked on a huge
reform and modernization of the Russian armed forces in
three distinct ways:
A “general” reform of the Russian armed forces
which had to be modernized by about 80%. This part
of the reform is now practically complete.
A specific reform to prepare the western and
southern military districts for a major conventional
war against the united West (as always in Russian
history) which would involve the First Guards Tank
Army and the Russian Airborne Forces.
The development of bleeding-edge weapons systems
with no equivalent in the West and which cannot be
countered or defeated; these weapons have had an
especially dramatic impact upon First Strike
Stability and upon naval operations.
While some US politicians
understood what was going on (I think of Ron Paul, see
here), most did not. They were so brainwashed by
the US propaganda that they were sure that no matter
what, “USA! USA! USA!”. Alas for them, the reality was
quite different.
Russian officials, by the way,
have confirmed that Russia was preparing for war.
Heck, the reforms were so profound and far reaching,
that it would have been impossible for the Russians to
hide what they were doing (see
here for details; also please see Andrei
Martyanov’s excellent primer on the new Russian Navy
here).
While no country is ever truly
prepared for war, I would argue that by 2020 the
Russians had reached their goals and that now
Russia is fully prepared to handle any conflict the West
might throw at her, ranging from a small border incident
somewhere in Central Asia to a full-scaled war against
the US/NATO in Europe.
Folks in the West are now slowly
waking up to this new reality (I mentioned some of that
here), but it is too late. In purely military
terms, Russia has now created such a qualitative gap
with the West that the still existing quantitative gap
is not sufficient to guarantee a US/NATO victory. Now
some western politicians are starting to seriously freak
out (see
this lady, for example), but most Europeans are
coming to terms with two truly horrible realities:
Russia is much stronger than Europe and, even
much worse,
Russia will never attack first (which is a major
cause of frustration for western russophobes)
As for the obvious solution to
this problem, having friendly relations with Russia is
simply unthinkable for those who made their entire
careers peddling the Soviet (and now Russian) threat to
the world.
But Russia is changing, albeit
maybe too slowly (at least for my taste). As I mentioned
last week, a number of Polish, Ukrainian and Baltic
politicians have declared that the Zapad2020 military
maneuvers which are supposed to take place in southern
Russia and the Caucasus could be used to prepare an
attack on the West (see
here for a rather typical example of this
nonsense). In the past, the Kremlin would only have made
a public statement ridiculing this nonsense, but this
time around Putin did something different. Right after
he saw the reaction of these politicians, Putin ordered
a major and UNSCHEDULED military readiness exercise
which involved no less than
150,000 troops, 400 aircraft & 100 ships! The
message here was clear:
Yes, we are much more powerful than you are and
No, we are not apologizing for our strength
anymore
And, just to make sure that the
message is clear, the Russians also tested the readiness
of the Russian Airborne Forces units near the city of
Riazan, see for yourself:
This response is, I think, the
correct one. Frankly, nobody in the West is listening to
what the Kremlin has to say, so what is the point of
making more statements which in the future will be
ignored equally as they have been in the past.
If anything, the slow realization
that Russia is more powerful than NATO would be most
helpful in gently prodding EU politicians to change
their tune and return back to reality. Check out this
recent video of Sarah Wagenknecht, a leading politician
of the German Left and see for yourself:
The example of Sahra
Wagenknecht is interesting, because she is from Germany,
one of the countries of northern Europe; traditionally,
northern European powers have been much more
anti-Russian than southern Europeans, so it is
encouraging to see that the anti-Putin and anti-Russia
hysteria is not always being endorsed by everybody.
But if things are very slowly
getting better in the EU, in the bad old US of A things
are only getting worse. Even the Republicans are now
fully on board the Russia-hating float (right behind a
“gay pride” one I suppose) and they are now contributing
their own insanity to the cause, as this article
entitled “Congressional
Republicans: Russia should be designated state sponsor
of terror” shows (designating Russia as a
terrorist state is an old idea of the Dems, by the way).
Russian options for the
Fall
In truth, Russia does not have
any particularly good options towards the US. Both
parties are now fully united in their rabid hatred of
Russia (and China too, of course). Furthermore, while
there are many well-funded and virulently anti-Russian
organizations in the US (Neo-cons, Papists, Poles,
Masons, Ukrainians, Balts, Ashkenazi Jews, etc.),
Russian organizations in the US like
this one, have very little influence or even
relevance.
However, as the chaos continues
to worsen inside the US and as US politicians continue
to alienate pretty much the entire planet, Russia does
have a perfect opportunity to weaken the US grip on
Europe. The beauty in the current dynamic is that Russia
does not have to do anything at all (nevermind anything
covert or illegal) to help the anti-EU and anti-US
forces in Europe: All she needs to do is to continuously
hammer in the following simple message: “the US is
sinking – do you really want to go down with it?”.
There are many opportunities to
deliver that message. The current US/Polish efforts to
prevent the EU from enjoying cheap Russian gas might
well be the best example of what we could call “European
suicide politics”, but there are many, many more.
Truth be told, neither the US nor
the EU are a top priority for Russia, at least not in
economic terms. The moral credibility of the West in
general can certainly be described as dead and long
gone. As for the West military might, it is only a
concern to the degree that western politicians might be
tempted to believe their own propaganda about their
military forces being the best in the history of the
galaxy. This is why Russia regularly engages in large
surprise exercises: to prove to the West that the
Russian military is fully ready for anything the West
might try. As for the constant move of more and more
US/NATO forces closer to the borders of Russia, they are
offensive in political terms, but in military terms,
getting closer to Russia only means that Russia will
have more options to destroy you. “Forward deployment”
is really a thing of the past, at least against Russia.
With time, however, and as the US
federal center loses even more of its control of the
country, the Kremlin might be well-advised to try to
open some venues for “popular diplomacy”, especially
with less hostile US states. The weakening of the
Executive Branch has already resulted in US governors
playing an increasingly important international role and
while this is not, strictly speaking, legal (only the
federal government has the right to engage in foreign
policy), the fact is that this has been going on for
years already. Another possible partner inside the US
for Russian firms would be US corporations (especially
now that they are hurting badly). Finally, I think that
the Kremlin ought to try to open channels of
communication with the various small political forces in
the US which are clearly not buying into the official
propaganda: libertarians, (true) liberals and
progressives, paleo-conservatives.
What we are witnessing before our
eyes is the collapse of the US federal center. This is a
dangerous and highly unstable moment in our history. But
from this crisis opportunities will arise. The best
thing Russia can do now is to simply remain very careful
and vigilant and wait for new forces to appear on the US
political scene.
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)