Warrior-Cops Are the Law -- and Above the Law -- as
Violence Grips America
By William J. AstoreJune 08, 2020 "Information
Clearing House" - From their front porches,
regular citizens watched a cordon of cops sweep down
their peaceful street in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Rankled
at being filmed, the cops exceeded their authority and
demanded that people go inside their houses. When some
of them didn’t obey quickly enough, the order -- one
heard so many times in the streets of Iraqi cities and
in the villages of Afghanistan -- was issued: “Light
'em up.” And so “disobedient” Americans found
themselves on the receiving end of non-lethal rounds for
the “crime” of watching the police from those porches.
It’s taken years from
Ferguson to this moment, but America’s cops have now
officially joined the military as "professional"
warriors. In the wake of George Floyd’s murder on
May 25th, those
warrior-cops have taken to the streets across the
country wearing combat gear and with attitudes to match.
They see
protesters, as well as the
reporters covering them, as the enemy and themselves
as the "thin blue line" of law and order.
The police take to bashing heads and thrashing
bodies, using weaponry so generously
funded by the American taxpayer: rubber bullets,
pepper spray (as Congresswoman Joyce Beatty of Ohio
experienced at a protest), tear gas (as Episcopal
clergy
experienced at a demonstration in Washington, D.C.),
paint canisters, and similar “non-lethal” munitions,
together with flash-bang grenades, standard-issue
batons, and Tasers, even as they drive military-surplus
equipment like Humvees and
MRAPs. (Note that such munitions
blinded an eye of one photo-journalist.) A Predator
drone even
hovered over at least one protest.
Who needs a military parade, President Trump?
Americans are witnessing militarized “parades” across
the U.S.A. Their theme:
violent force. The result: plenty of wounded and
otherwise damaged Americans left in their wake. The
detritus of America’s foreign wars has finally well and
truly found its place on Main Street, U.S.A.
Cops are to blame for much of this mayhem. Video
clips
show them wildly out of control, inciting violence
and inflicting it, instead of defusing and preventing
it. Far too often, “to serve and protect” has become “to
shoot and smack down.” It suggests the character of Eric
Cartman from the cartoon South Park, a boy
inflamed by a badge and a chance to inflict physical
violence without accountability. “Respect my
authoritah!”
cries Cartman as he beats an innocent man for no
reason.
So, let’s point cameras -- and fingers -- at these
bully-boy cops, let’s document their crimes, but let’s
also state a fact with courage: it’s not just their
fault.
Who else is to blame? Well, so many of us. How stupid
have we been to celebrate cops as heroes, just as we’ve
been
foolishly doing for so long with the U.S. military?
Few people are heroes and fewer still deserve “hero”
status while wearing uniforms and shooting bullets,
rubber or otherwise, at citizens.
Answer me this: Who granted cops a
specially-modified U.S. flag to celebrate "blue
lives matter," and when exactly did that happen, and why
the hell do so many people fly these as substitute U.S.
flags? Has everyone forgotten American history and the
use of police (as well as National Guard units) to
suppress organized labor, keep blacks and other
minorities in their place, intimidate ordinary citizens
protesting for a cleaner environment, or whack hippies
and anti-war liberals during the Vietnam War protests?
Or think of what’s happening this way: America’s
violent overseas wars, thriving for almost two decades
despite their emptiness, their lack of meaning, have
finally and truly come home. An
impoverished empire, in which
violence and disease are endemic, is collapsing
before our eyes.
Are You Tired Of
The Lies And
Non-Stop Propaganda?
|
“When the looting starts, the shooting starts,”
America’s self-styled wartime president
promised, channeling a racist Miami police chief
from 1967. It was a declaration meant to turn any
American who happened to be near a protest into a
potential victim.
As such demonstrations proliferate, Americans now
face a grim prospect: the chance to be wounded or
killed, then dismissed as “collateral damage.” In these
years, that tried-and-false
military euphemism has been applied so thoughtlessly
to innumerable innocents who have suffered grievously
from our unending foreign wars and now it’s coming home.
How does it feel, America?
The End of Citizen-Soldiers, the End of
Citizen-Cops
I joined the military in 1981, signing up in college
for the Reserve Officer Training Corps, or ROTC. I went
on active duty in 1985 and served for 20 years, retiring
as a lieutenant colonel. I come from a family of
firefighters and cops. My dad and older brother were
firefighters, together with my brother-in-law and
nephew. My niece and her husband are cops and my sister
worked for her local police department for years. My
oldest friend, a great guy I’ve known for half a
century, recently retired as a deputy sheriff. I know
these people because they’re my people.
Many cops -- I’d say most -- are decent people. But
dress almost any cop in combat gear, cover him or her in
armor like a stormtrooper out of Star Wars,
then set all of them loose on the streets with a mandate
to restore “LAW & ORDER,” as our president tweeted, and
you’re going to get stormtrooper-like behavior.
Sure, I’d wager that more than a few cops enjoy it,
or at least it seems that way in the videos captured by
so many. But let’s remind ourselves that the cops, like
the rest of America’s systems of authority, are a
product of a sociopolitical structure that’s inherently
violent, openly racist, deeply flawed, and thoroughly
corrupted by money, power, greed, and privilege. In such
a system, why should we expect them to be paragons of
virtue and restraint? We don’t recruit them that way. We
don’t train them that way. Indeed, we salute them as
“warriors” when they respond to risky situations in
aggressive ways.
Here’s my point: When I put on a military uniform in
1985, I underwent a subtle but meaningful change from a
citizen to a citizen-airman. (Note how “citizen” still
came first then.) Soon after, however, the U.S. military
began telling me I was something more than that: I was a
warrior. And that was a distinct and new identity
for me, evidently a tougher, more worthy one than simply
being a citizen-airman. That new “warrior” image and the
mystique that grew up around it was integral to, and
illustrative of, the beginning of a wider
militarization of American culture and society,
which exploded after the 9/11 attacks amid the “big-boy
pants” braggadocio of the administration of
President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney
as they set out to remake the world as an American
possession.
Why all the “warrior” BS? Why “Generation
Kill” (one of those memorable phrases of the
post-9/11 era)? Was it to give us a bit more spine or
something to rally around after the calamity of those
attacks on iconic American targets, or perhaps something
to take pride in after so many disastrous wars over the
last 75 years? It took me a while to answer such
questions. Indeed, it took me a while to grasp that such
questions were almost beside the point. Because all this
warrior talk, whether applied to the military or the
cops, is truly meant to separate us from the American
people, to link us instead to wider systems of
impersonal authority, such as the
military-industrial-congressional complex.
By “elevating” us as warriors, the elites conspired
to reduce us as citizens, detaching us from a citizen’s
code of civics and moral behavior. By accepting the
conceit of such an identity, we warriors and former
warriors became, in a sense, foreign to democracy and
ever more divorced from the citizenry. We came to form
foreign legions, readily exploitable in America’s
endless imperial-corporate wars, whether overseas or now
here.
(Notice, by the way, how, in the preceding
paragraphs, I use “we” and “us,” continuing to identify
with the military, though I’ve been retired for 15
years. On rereading it, I thought about revising that
passage, until I realized that was precisely the point:
a career military officer is, in some way, always in the
military. The ethos is that strong. The same is true of
cops.)
In 2009,
I first asked if the U.S. military had become an
imperial police force. In 2020, we need to ask if our
police are now just another branch of that military,
with our “homeland” serving as the empire to be
conquered and exploited. That said, let’s turn to
America’s cops. They’re now likely to identify as
warriors, too, and indeed many of them have served in
America’s violent and endless wars in Afghanistan, Iraq,
and elsewhere. These days, they’re ever more likely to
identify as well with authority, as defined and
exercised by the elites for whom they serve as hired
guns.
In the aftermath of George Floyd’s
murder, the warrior-mercenary mindset of the police
has been fully exposed. For what was Floyd’s great
“crime”? At worst, if true, an attempt at petty theft
through forgery. He’d lost his job due to the Covid-19
crisis and, like most of us, was lucky if he saw a
one-time check for $1,200, even as the rich and powerful
enjoyed
trillions of dollars in relief.
Rarely are the police sent to prosecute scofflaws in
high places. I haven’t seen any bankers being choked to
death on the street under an officer’s knee. Nor have I
seen any corporate “citizens” being choked to death by
cops. It’s so much easier to hassle and arrest the
little people for whom, if they’re black or otherwise
vulnerable, arrest may even end in death.
By standing apart from us, militarized, a thin blue
line, the police no longer stand with us.
A friend of mine, an Air Force retired colonel,
nailed it in a recent email to me: “I used to -- maybe
not enjoy but -- not mind talking to the police. It was
the whole ‘community partners’ thing. Growing up and
through college, you just waved at cops on patrol
(they’d wave back!). Over the last five years, all I get
is cops staring back in what I imagine they think is an
intimidating grimace. They say nothing when you say
hello. They are all in full ‘battle rattle’ even when
directing traffic.”
When military “battle rattle” becomes the standard
gear for street cops, should we be that surprised to
hear the death rattle of black men like George Floyd?
Speaking Truth to Power Isn’t Nearly Enough
Perhaps you’ve heard the saying “speaking truth to
power.” It’s meant as a form of praise. But a rejoinder
I once read captures its inherent limitations: power
already knows the truth -- and I’d add that the powerful
are all too happy with their monopoly on their version
of the truth, thank you very much.
It’s not enough to say that the police are too
violent, or racist, or detached from society. Powerful
people already know this perfectly well. Indeed, they’re
counting on it. They’re counting on cops being violent
to protect elite interests; nor is racism the worst
thing in the world, they believe, as long as it’s not
hurting their financial bottom lines. If it divides
people, making them all the more exploitable, so much
the better. And who cares if cops are detached from the
interests of the working and lower middle classes from
which they’ve come? Again, all the better, since that
means they can be sicked on protesters and, if things
get out of hand, those very protesters can then be
blamed. If push comes to shove, a few cops might have to
be fired, or prosecuted, or otherwise sacrificed, but
that hardly matters as long as the powerful get off
scot-free.
President Trump knows this. He talks about
“dominating” the protesters. He insists that they must
be arrested and jailed for long periods of time. After
all, they are the “other,” the enemy. He’s willing to
have them tear gassed and shot with rubber bullets just
so
he can pose in front of a church holding a Bible.
Amazingly, the one amendment he mentioned defending in
his “law and order”
speech just before he walked to that church was the
Second Amendment.
And this highlights Trump’s skill as a wall-builder.
No, I don’t mean that “big,
fat, beautiful wall” along the U.S. border with
Mexico. He’s proven himself a master at building walls
to divide people within America --
to separate Republicans from Democrats, blacks and
other peoples of color from whites, Christians from
non-Christians, fervid gun owners from gun-control
advocates, and cops from the little people. Divide and
conquer, the oldest trick in the authoritarian handbook,
and Donald Trump is good at it.
But he’s also a dangerous fool in a moment when we
need bridges, not walls to unite these divided states of
ours. And that starts with the cops. We need to change
the way many of them think. No more “thin blue line” BS.
No more cops as warriors. No more special flags for how
much their lives matter. We need but a single flag for
how much all our lives matter, black or white, rich or
poor, the powerless as well as the powerful.
How about that old-fashioned American flag I served
under as a military officer for 20 years? How about the
stars and stripes that draped my father’s casket after
his more than 30 years of fighting fires, whether in the
forests of Oregon or the urban tenements of
Massachusetts? It was good enough for him and me (and
untold millions of others). It should still be good
enough for everyone.
But let me be clear: my dad knew how to put out
fires, but once a house was “fully involved,” he used to
tell me, there’s little you can do but stand back and
watch it burn while keeping the fire from spreading.
America’s forever wars in distant lands have now come
home big time. Our house is lit up and on fire. Alarms
are being sounded over and over again. If we fail to
come together to fight the fire until our house is fully
involved, we will find ourselves -- and what’s left of
our democracy -- burning with it.
A retired lieutenant colonel (USAF) and history
professor, William Astore is a
TomDispatch regular. He is proud to
count many “first responders” in his immediate family.
His personal blog is
Bracing Views.
Follow TomDispatch on
Twitter and join us on
Facebook. Check out the newest Dispatch Books, John
Feffer’s new dystopian novel (the second in the
Splinterlands series)
Frostlands, Beverly Gologorsky's novel
Every Body Has a Story, and Tom Engelhardt's
A Nation Unmade by War, as well as Alfred
McCoy's
In the Shadows of the American Century: The Rise and
Decline of U.S. Global Power and John Dower's
The Violent American Century: War and Terror Since World
War II. - "Source"
-
Copyright 2020 William J. Astore