Our Grim
Future: Restored Neoliberalism or Hybrid Neofascism?
By Pepe Escobar
June 01, 2020 "Information
Clearing House" - With the specter of a New
Great Depression hovering over most of the planet,
realpolitik perspectives for a radical change of the
political economy framework we live in are not exactly
encouraging.
Western ruling elites will be deploying myriad
tactics to perpetuate the passivity of populations
barely emerging from de facto house arrest, including a
massive disciplinary – in a Foucault sense – drive by
states and business/finance circles.
In his
latest book,
La Desaparicion de los Rituales,
Byung-Chul Han shows how total communication, especially
in a time of pandemic, now coincides with total
vigilance: “Domination impersonates freedom. Big Data
generates a domineering knowledge that allows the
possibility of intervening in the human psyche, and
manipulating it. Considering it this way, the data-ist
imperative of transparency is not a continuation of the
Enlightenment, but its ending.”
This
revamping of Foucault’s Discipline and Punish coincides
with reports about the demise of the neoliberal era
being vastly overstated. Instead of a simplistic plunge
into populist nationalism, what is on the horizon points
mostly to a
Neoliberalism Restoration
– massively spun as a novelty, and incorporating some
Keynesian elements: after all, in the post-Lockdown era,
to “save” the markets and private initiative the state
must not only intervene but also facilitate a possible
ecological transition.
The bottom line: we may be facing a mere cosmetic
approach, in which the deep structural crisis of zombie
capitalism – barely moving under unpopular “reforms” and
infinite debt – still is not addressed.
Meanwhile, what is going to happen to assorted fascisms?
Eric Hobsbawm showed us in
Age of Extremes how the
key to the fascist right was always mass mobilization:
“Fascists were the revolutionaries of the
counter-revolution”.