COVID-19
Exposed the Fraud of ‘American Exceptionalism’
Our leaders were so preoccupied with remaking the world
they failed to see that our country was falling apart
around them.
By Daniel Larison
May 29, 2020 "Information
Clearing House" -
Has the time come to bury
the conceit of American exceptionalism? In an article
for the American edition of The Spectator,
Quincy Institute President Andrew Bacevich
concludes just that:
The coronavirus pandemic is a curse. It should
also serve as an opportunity, Americans at long last
realizing that they are not God’s agents. Out of
suffering and loss, humility and self-awareness
might emerge. We can only hope.
The heart of the American exceptionalism in question
is American hubris. It is based on the assumption that
we are better than the rest of the world, and that this
superiority both entitles and obligates us to take on an
outsized role in the world.
In our
current foreign policy debates, the phrase “American
exceptionalism” has served as a shorthand for justifying
and celebrating U.S. dominance, and when necessary it
has served as a blanket excuse for U.S. wrongdoing.
Seongjong Song defined it in an
2015 article for The
Korean Journal of International Studies this way:
“American exceptionalism is the belief that the US is
“qualitatively different” from all other nations.” In
practice, that has meant that the U.S. does not consider
itself to be bound by the same rules that apply to other
states, and it reserves the right to interfere whenever
and wherever it wishes.
American exceptionalism has been used in our
political debates as an ideological purity test to
determine whether certain political leaders are
sufficiently supportive of an activist and
interventionist foreign policy. The main purpose of
invoking American exceptionalism in foreign policy
debate has been to denigrate less hawkish policy views
as unpatriotic and beyond the pale. The phrase was often
used as a partisan cudgel in the previous decade as the
Obama administration’s critics tried to cast doubt on
the former president’s acceptance of this idea, but in
the years since then it has become a rallying point for
devotees of U.S. primacy regardless of party. There was
an explosion in the use of the phrase in just the first
few years of the 2010s compared with the previous
decades. Song cited a study that showed this massive
increase:
Exceptionalist discourse is on the rise in
American politics. Terrence McCoy (2012) found that
the term “American exceptionalism” appeared in US
publications 457 times between 1980 and 2000,
climbing to 2,558 times in the 2000s and 4,172 times
in 2010-12.
The more
that U.S. policies have proved “American exceptionalism”
to be a pernicious myth at odds with reality, the more
we have heard the phrase used to defend those policies.
Republican hawks began the decade by accusing Obama of
not believing in this “exceptionalism,” and some
Democratic hawks closed it out by
“reclaiming” the idea
on behalf of their own discredited foreign policy
vision. There may be differences in emphasis between the
two camps, but there is a consensus that the U.S. has
special rights and privileges that other nations cannot
have. That has translated into waging unnecessary wars,
assuming excessive overseas burdens, and trampling on
the rights of other states, and all the while
congratulating ourselves on how virtuous we are for
doing all of it.