Don’t look now,
but Joe is failing. Not only has
his campaign been rocked by sexual assault
allegations from one-time staffer Tara
Reade, but the public is beginning to give
up on the former vice president. A
new Emerson College poll showed
57 percent of likely voters think
President Trump
will win reelection in November.
Remember, Establishment Democrats put
forward Uncle Joe because he was the “safe”
candidate, bound to defeat Trump. Oops.
That’s not the only problem that crops up in
the Emerson Poll. It also shows Trump
supporters 19 points more enthusiastic about
their candidate than Biden supporters. That
“enthusiasm gap” will drive turnout this
fall. With Democrats dependent on young
people and minorities, both typically less
reliable voters, that lack of excitement for
the candidate could be a big problem.
Also less than
gung-ho about Biden is, predictably,
Bernie Sanders’s
army. Though the Vermont socialist has
endorsed Biden, 51 percent of Bernie
supporters are, according to Emerson, open
to voting for a third-party candidate.
Another red
flag is Biden’s tepid fund-raising;
according to the New York Times, Trump has a
monster
cash advantage of $187 million.
Further, in swing-state polling, the
presumptive Democratic nominee is
running behind
where Hillary Clinton stood at this point in
the race, and we know how that turned out.
Are You Tired Of
The Lies And
Non-Stop Propaganda?
As
all of those issues cast doubt on Biden’s
prospects, the presumptive nominee must now
fend off Tara Reade’s allegations, which put
#MeToo-supporting Democrats into an
incredibly awkward spot.
None of this augurs well for the Biden
campaign, which will likely confront further
obstacles in the months ahead. Eventually,
the coronavirus will no longer excuse the
former VP’s invisibility; he will have to
engage in the kind of give-and-take that
often shows him getting befuddled, including
real – not scripted – town halls and
interviews.
At that point,
the public will see what numerous
Democrats have noted
sotto voce – Obama’s former wing-man is
struggling with some cognitive decline.
We
really cannot elect a president who mixes up
his sister with his wife or who collapses in
mid-sentence, unsure of where he’s going
next.
This
video was embedded by ICH and did not appear
in the original article.
Democrats’ obstacle to pushing Biden aside
is Bernie Sanders. The Vermont senator was
the runner-up in the primaries, and
continues to hold onto his delegates.
Democratic leaders do not want to see
Sanders resurgent; they are convinced he is
unelectable. But they also know that if they
move to replace Biden at the top of the
ticket, and don’t elevate Sanders, the
Bernie Bros would revolt.
Indeed, it seems clear that party officials
are so worried Sanders might stage another
run that they cancelled the 224-delegate
rich New York State primary. They claimed
the vote would have been dangerous in that
epicenter of COVID-19, but since they still
plan to host a primary for state and local
officials, that excuse seems weak.
As
the primaries roll forward, and especially
with officials’ thumbs on the scales, Biden
will almost certainly win the candidacy. In
the absence of a brokered convention, how
could Democrats replace their
standard-bearer?
One idea has
been to convince Biden to step aside in
favor of the very popular
Michelle Obama,
seen as a sure bet to beat Trump. So far,
though, the former first lady has reportedly
rebuffed
all invitations to enter the fray.
That leaves Hillary Clinton. Biden could
choose Clinton as his running mate, and then
step down before the election and allow
Hillary to run in his place.
Clinton is the
only VP candidate who would be able to pull
off such a last-minute switch. She has the
team, the resources and the experience to be
the nominee; Sen.
Amy Klobuchar
(D-Minn.), former Georgia state Rep. Stacey
Abrams and Sen.
Kamala Harris
(D-Calif.) do not.
Clinton is
ready and eager. She is desperate to avenge
her 2016 loss (which she
still blames on Putin)
and has
pumped up her public profile
to keep herself in consideration. In past
months she has conducted endless interviews,
promoted the uber-flattering four-part Hulu
film about herself, made headlines by
attacking Bernie Sanders and
Mark Zuckerberg,
and fired unending broadsides against
President Trump.
Most recently,
she joined Vice President Biden in a town
hall devoted to women’s issues, during which
she
effusively endorsed
her long-time colleague. She reminisced
about their time together in the Obama
administration, talked about their mutual
love of Scranton, Pa., where her father grew
up, and recalled meetings in the Situation
Room.
In
fact, Clinton talked so much about their
shared history that it was easy to forget
that she was endorsing Joe Biden. It almost
sounded as though she were touting her own
resume instead.
Maybe she was.
How
would Hillary stack up as a nominee this
time around? Hillary certainly looks
stronger and more fired-up than Biden; she
has the energy he lacks. She has a bigger
following on social media (28 million
Twitter followers, compared to 5 million,
for instance) and she has a large devoted
following who, like Hillary, still cannot
believe she lost in 2016.
She could count
on President Obama to campaign for her, as
Biden also can, and she would also have
ever-popular husband Bill helping out. In
2016, Democrats were not wildly excited
about her candidacy, but her “enthusiasm”
readings were
better than Biden’s today.
As was her polling in critical battleground
states.
Hillary is hideously polarizing, but she
would be a more forceful nominee than Biden,
has enormous name recognition and, perhaps
most important, can begin and end a sentence
without major detours. And, she has not been
credibly accused of sexual assault.
Hillary may be Democrats’ nominee of last
resort. You know she wants it.
Liz Peek is a former partner
of major bracket Wall Street firm Wertheim &
Company. Follow her on Twitter @lizpeek. -
"Source"
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)