How
do rogue states get off the ‘terror list’? With
cold, hard cash – just like the US and UK
The most interesting aspect of the money to be paid
out by Sudan – blood money, in Arab eyes – is that
the nation still does not regard itself as
responsible for any act of terror
By Robert Fisk
April 12, 2020 "Information
Clearing House" - How do you get off a
“terrorist” list? It seems that hard cash helps.
Take
Sudan. Its ministry
of justice has just announced that it’s finalised a
February deal with the families of the 17 US sailors
killed in the suicide attack on the USS Cole in Aden
harbour in October 2000. The dead Americans left 11
children behind them and so the reported $70m (£59m)
settlement will care for them too. The relatives
claimed that Sudan, under its then war criminal
president Omar al-Bashir, had provided support to
al-Qaeda, which claimed the attack.
Who
knows? The US listed Sudan as a “state sponsor of
terror” in 1993 – the same year
I first met Osama bin Laden
in the Sudanese village of Almatig, surrounded by
his unarmed warriors and Sudan’s very well-armed
security cops. But he was expelled to Afghanistan
three years later. That’s four years before two
al-Qaeda suicide bombers in an explosives-heavy
fibreglass boat smashed into the hull of the
four-year-old Aegis-class guided missile destroyer
Cole as it lay moored, refuelling, off Aden harbour.
Omar al-Bashir took power in Khartoum in 1989.
Now that he has been overthrown, Sudan’s
transitional government desperately needs debt
relief and international funding. The ministry of
justice was quite frank about that this
week: “Removing Sudan’s name from this list is
necessary to remove the stigma of terrorism off the
people of Sudan and to reintegrate Sudan back in the
international community.”
The government, it seems, first negotiated with
the families of the dead sailors, then with the US
administration to compensate for al-Qaeda attacks in
east Africa.
But it isn’t that simple. The head of the
two-bomber unit which attacked the Cole was a Yemeni
named Jamal al-Badawi, killed in a US air raid last
year. According to the US, however, the man who
planned the attack on the Cole was Abd Rahman al-Nashiri,
a Saudi currently imprisoned in Guantanamo. Needless
to say, Saudi Arabia – having never been involved in
any attack on anyone, ever – got off the hook. As it
did seven years after the Aden bombing, when 15 of
the 19 hijackers of 9/11 turned out to be Saudi
citizens. But that’s not quite the point.
The most interesting aspect of the money to be
paid out by Sudan – blood money, in Arab eyes – is
that Sudan still does not regard itself as
responsible for the Cole attack, or any other
“terrorist” act.