Arundhati
Roy: ‘The pandemic is a portal’By
Arundhati Roy
April 12, 2020 "Information
Clearing House" - Who can use
the term “gone viral” now without shuddering a
little? Who can look at anything any more — a door
handle, a cardboard carton, a bag of vegetables —
without imagining it swarming with those unseeable,
undead, unliving blobs dotted with suction pads
waiting to fasten themselves on to our lungs?
Who can think of kissing a stranger, jumping on
to a bus or sending their child to school without
feeling real fear? Who can think of ordinary
pleasure and not assess its risk? Who among us is
not a quack epidemiologist, virologist, statistician
and prophet? Which scientist or doctor is not
secretly praying for a miracle? Which priest is not
— secretly, at least — submitting to science?
And even while the virus proliferates, who could
not be thrilled by the swell of birdsong in cities,
peacocks dancing at traffic crossings and the
silence in the skies?
The
number of cases worldwide this week crept over
a million. More
than 50,000 people have died already. Projections
suggest that number will swell to hundreds of
thousands, perhaps more. The virus has moved freely
along the pathways of trade and international
capital, and the terrible illness it has brought in
its wake has locked humans down in their countries,
their cities and their homes.
But unlike the flow of capital, this virus seeks
proliferation, not profit, and has, therefore,
inadvertently, to some extent, reversed the
direction of the flow. It has mocked immigration
controls, biometrics, digital surveillance and every
other kind of data analytics, and struck hardest —
thus far — in the richest, most powerful nations of
the world, bringing the engine of capitalism to a
juddering halt. Temporarily perhaps, but at least
long enough for us to examine its parts, make an
assessment and decide whether we want to help fix
it, or look for a better engine.
The mandarins who are managing this pandemic are
fond of speaking of war. They don’t even use war as
a metaphor, they use it literally. But if it really
were a war, then who would be better prepared than
the US? If it were not masks and gloves that its
frontline soldiers needed, but guns, smart bombs,
bunker busters, submarines, fighter jets and nuclear
bombs, would there be a shortage?
Night
after night, from halfway across the world, some of
us watch the New
York governor’s
press briefings with a fascination that is hard to
explain. We follow the statistics, and hear the
stories of overwhelmed hospitals in the US, of
underpaid, overworked nurses having to make masks
out of garbage bin liners and old raincoats, risking
everything to bring succour to the sick. About
states being forced to bid against each other for
ventilators, about doctors’ dilemmas over which
patient should get one and which left to die. And we
think to ourselves, “My God! This is America!”