As far as realpolitik Afghanistan is concerned, with
or without a deal, the US military want to stay in
what is a priceless Greater Middle East base to
deploy hybrid war techniques
By Pepe Escobar
February 28, 2020 "Information
Clearing House" -
Nearly two decades after the
invasion and occupation of Afghanistan post-9/11,
and after an interminable war costing over $ 2
trillion, there’s hardly anything “historic” about a
possible peace deal that may be signed in Doha this
coming Saturday between Washington and the Taliban.
We should start by stressing three points.
1- The Taliban wanted all US troops out.
Washington refused.
2- The possible deal only reduces US troops from
13,000 to 8,600. That’s the same number already
deployed before the Trump administration.
3- The reduction will only happen a year and a
half from now – assuming what’s being described as a
truce holds.
So there would be no misunderstanding, Taliban
Deputy Leader Sirajuddin Haqqani, in an
op-ed certainly read by everyone inside the
Beltway, detailed their straightforward red line:
total US withdrawal.
And Haqqani is adamant: there’s no peace deal if US
troops stay.
Still, a deal looms. How come? Simple: enter a
series of secret “annexes.”
The top US negotiator, the seemingly eternal
Zalmay Khalilzad, a remnant of the Clinton and Bush
eras, has spent months codifying these annexes – as
confirmed by a source in Kabul currently not in
government but familiar with the negotiations.