Without any proof, The New York Times and Washington
Post run “Russia helping Sanders” stories, and
Sanders responds by bashing Russia, writes Joe
Lauria.
By Joe Lauria
February 22, 2020 "Information
Clearing House" -
With
Democratic frontrunner Bernie Sanders spooking the
Democratic establishment, The Washington Post
Friday reported damaging information from
intelligence sources against Sanders by saying that
Russia is trying to help his campaign.
If the story is true
and if intelligence agencies are truly committed to
protecting U.S. citizens, the Sanders campaign would
have been quietly informed and shown evidence to
back up the claims.
Instead the story wound
up on the front page of the Post,
“according to people familiar with the matter.” Zero
evidence was produced to back up the intelligence
agencies’ assertion.
“It is not clear what
form that Russian assistance has taken,” the
Post reported. That would tell any traditional
news editor that there was no story until it is
known.
Instead major U.S.
media are again playing the role of laundering
totally unverified “information” just because it
comes from an intelligence source. Reporting such
assertions without proof amounts to an abdication of
journalistic responsibility. It shows total trust in
U.S. intelligence despite decades of deception and
skullduggery from these agencies.
Centrist Democratic
Party leaders have expressed extreme unease with
Sanders leading the Democratic pack. Politico
reported
Friday that former New York Mayor Mike Bloomberg’s
entry into the race is explicitly to stop Sanders
from winning on the first ballot at the party
convention.
A day after The New
York Times
reported,
also without evidence, that Russia is again trying
to help Donald Trump win in November, the Post
reports Moscow is trying to help Sanders too, again
without substance. Both candidates whom the
establishment loathes were smeared on successive
days.