Creator Of BioWeapons Act Says
Coronavirus Is Biological Warfare Weapon
Interview with Dr. Francis Boyle
February 17, 2020 "Information
Clearing House" -Geopolitics
& Empire is joined by Dr. Francis Boyle, who is
international law professor at the University of
Illinois. We’ll be discussing the
Wuhan coronavirus and biological warfare. He’s
served as counsel to numerous governments such as
Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Palestinian
authority. He’s represented numerous national
international bodies in the areas of human rights,
war crimes and genocide, nuclear policy, and
biowarfare. He’s written numerous books, one of my
favorites being “Destroying Libya and World Order”,
which I assigned as mandatory reading material for
my own students when I taught at the Monterrey
Institute of Technology.
But most important for this interview, he’s
written a book called “Biowarfare and Terrorism”,
and drafted the US domestic implementing legislation
for the biological weapons convention, known as the
Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989 that
was approved unanimously by both houses of the US
Congress and signed into law by President Bush.
Thanks for joining us, Dr. Boyle.
Dr.
Francis Boyle: Wow. Thank you so much for
having me on and thanks for that kind introduction.
Geopolitics and Empire: Now
let’s get to what’s been on the news recently. This
coronavirus in Wuhan. There have been some
reports recently, there’s a really interesting
website called GreatGameIndia
that has been reporting on this. They’ve been
talking about China, which they say has been
complying with biological weapons convention in
recent years.
But then there are some people in the US and
experts that have been saying that in reality, China
isn’t complying with the weapons convention. And I
think neither, perhaps the US as well. I’m wondering
if China is developing its own biosafety level four
lab in Wuhan and elsewhere, as you know, as a type
of deterrence. Is it a type of a biological arms
race that we have going on?
You told me in an email that you suspect China
was developing the
coronavirus as a dual use of biowarfare weapons
agent. Also, what do you make of reports that
Chinese scientists have been stealing research and
viruses, including the coronavirus from a Canadian
bio lab this past December?
And as well, Chinese nationals have been charged
with smuggling vials of biological research to China
from the US with the aid of Charles Lieber who was
the chair of Harvard’s chemistry department. And he
also happens to be in 2011 a strategic scientist at
Wuhan University. So, can you tell us what’s going
on with this recent outbreak in Wuhan?
Dr. Francis Boyle: Well, that’s
a lot of questions. I guess we can take them one at
a time, but if you just do a very simple Google
search on “Does China have a BSL-4 laboratory?”,
Wuhan comes up right away. It’s at the top of the
list. That’s all with the moment this type of thing
happened I began to do that. So a BSL-4 is the most
serious type. And basically BSL-4 labs, we have many
of them here in the United States, are used to
develop offensive biological warfare weapons with
DNA genetic engineering.
So it does seem to me that the Wuhan
BSL-4 is the source of the coronavirus. My guess is
that they were researching SARS, and they weaponize
it further by giving it a gain of function
properties, which means it could be more lethal.
Indeed, the latest report now is it’s a 15%
fatality rate, which is more than SARS at 83%
infection rate. A typical gain of function travels
in the air so it could reach out maybe six feet or
more from someone emitting a sneeze or a cough.
Likewise, this is a specially designated WHO
research lab. The WHO was in on it and they knew
full well what was going on there.
Are You Tired Of
The Lies And
Non-Stop Propaganda?
Yes. It’s also been reported that Chinese
scientists stole coronavirus materials from the
Canadian lab at Winnipeg. Winnipeg is Canada’s
formal center for research, developing, testing,
biological warfare weapons. It’s along the lines of
Fort Detrick here in the United States of America. I
have three degrees from Harvard. It would not
surprise me if something was being stolen out of
Harvard to turn over to China. I read that report. I
don’t know what was in those vials one way or the
other.
But the bottom line is I drafted the US domestic
implementing legislation for the Biological Weapons
Convention that was approved unanimously by both
Houses in the United States Congress signed into law
by President Bush Sr. that it appears the
coronavirus that we’re dealing with here is an
offensive
biological warfare weapon that leaped out of
Wuhan BSL-4. I’m not saying it was done
deliberately. But there had been previous reports of
problems with that lab and things leaking out of it.
I’m afraid that is what we are dealing with today.
MUST READ
TRANSCRIPT of the exclusive interview conducted by @Geopolitics_Emp with Bioweapons expert Dr. Francis Boyle on the origins of #Coronavirus. Dr Boyle drafted the US Bioweapons Act for the Bioweapons Convention followed by numerous countries.https://t.co/JVAz2Ahk5c
Geopolitics and Empire: We’ll be
talking about the Wuhan and the coronavirus and
China, but can you give us kind of like a bigger
context. I know you’ve, previously, in interviews
said that since 9/11, you think that the US
has spent $100 billion on biological warfare
research. We know the Soviet Union, if I’m
not mistaken, developed anthrax as a bioweapon. And
you’ve also mentioned that UK, France, Israel and
China are all involved in biological warfare weapons
research.
And something interesting, I believe one or two
years ago a Bulgarian journalist and the Russian
government shared their concern of the discovery of
a US bioweapons lab in the country of Georgia.
You’ve commented how in Africa, US has set up
bioweapons labs to work on Ebola, which I think is
illegal under international law. But they were
allowed somehow to put those in Africa. Can you give
us like a bigger picture? What’s going on with these
different countries and what’s the purpose of this
research?
Dr. Francis Boyle:All
these BSL-4 labs are by United States, Europe,
Russia, China, Israel are all there to research,
develop, test biological warfare agents. There’s
really no legitimate scientific reason to have BSL-4
labs. That figure I gave $100 billion, that was
about 2015 I believe. I had crunched the numbers and
came up with that figure the United States since
9/11.
To give you an idea that’s as much in constant
dollars as the US spent to develop the Manhattan
Project and the atom bomb. So it’s clearly all
weapons related. We have well over 13,000
alleged life science scientists involved in research
developed testing biological weapons here in the
United States. Actually this goes back it
even precedes 9/11 2001.
I have another book, The Future of International
Law and American Foreign Policy, tracing that all
the way back to the Reagan administration under the
influence of the neocons and they got very heavily
involved in research development testing of
biological weapons with DNA genetic engineers. It
was because of that I issued my plea in 1985 in a
Congressional briefing sponsored by the Council for
Responsible Genetics, I’m a lawyer for them. They’re
headquartered in Cambridge, Mass. All the MIT,
Harvard people are involved in that, the principal
ones. And then they asked me to draft the
implementing legislation.
The implementing legislation that I drafted was
originally designed to stop this type of work.
“Death science work”, I call it, “by the United
States government”. After 9/11, 2001, it just
completely accelerated. My current figure, that last
figure a 100 billion. I haven’t had a chance to
re-crunch the numbers because I just started
classes. But you have to add in about another 5
billion per year.
Basically, this is offensive biological
weapons raised by the United States government and
with its assistance in Canada and Britain. And
so other States, the world have responded
accordingly including Russia and China. They were
going to set up a whole series of BSL-4 facilities
as well. And you know Wuhan was the first. It
backfired on them.
Geopolitics and Empire: Would
you basically consider what happened and Wuhan and
just boil it down to ineptitude or incompetence on
the Chinese part?
Dr. Francis Boyle: Well, it’s
criminality. It does appear they stole something
there from Winnipeg. This activity that they engaged
in clearly violates the Biological Weapons
Convention. Research development of biological
weapons these days is an international crime, the
use of it would be. That was criminal.
I’m not saying they deliberately inflicted this
on their own people, but it leaked out of there and
all these BSL-4 facilities leak. Everyone knows that
who studies this. So this was a catastrophe waiting
to happen. Unfortunately, it happened. The
Chinese government under Xi and his comrades there
have been covering this up from the get-go. The
first reported case was December 1, so they’d been
sitting on this until they couldn’t anymore. And
everything they’re telling you is a lie. It’s
propaganda.
The WHO still refuses to declare a global health
emergency. It said Tedros was over there shaking
hands with Xi and smiling and yanking it up. The WHO
was in on it. They’ve approved many of these BSL-4
labs., they know exactly what’s going on and that is
a WHO research-approved laboratory. They know what’s
going on too. You can’t really believe
anything the WHO is telling you about this, either
they’re up to their eyeballs in it, in my opinion.
Geopolitics and Empire: I’d
probably agree with you that this outbreak in Wuhan
was an accidental leak from the laboratory. But just
your thoughts, it’s happening at quite an opportune
time because namely we’re smack in the middle of a
US-China new Cold War, which is currently
characterized by economic warfare such as the trade
war among other forms of hybrid and technological
warfare. And it seems the Wuhan outbreak will likely
hit the Chinese economy hard. The Chinese are flat
out dismissing any idea that the US is involved in.
Like I said, it’s probably they made the mistakes in
the Wuhan lab. What are your thoughts of any
seemingly, this would benefit the US…
Dr. Francis Boyle: When the
outbreak occurred, of course I considered that
alternative too. When you have an outbreak, you’re
never quite sure who or what is behind it. It
certainly isn’t bats, that’s ridiculous. They
made the same argument on Ebola in West Africa. I
demolished that online. You can check it out. So I
kept competing theories about this.
But right now, when you originally contacted me,
I said I wasn’t prepared to comment because I was
weighing the evidence. I’m a law professor and a
lawyer, I try to do the best I can to weigh the
evidence. But right now, the Wuhan BSL-4 in my
opinion is the most likely source, apply Occam’s
razor, the simplest explanation. I’m not ruling out
some type of sabotage. But right now, I believe that
is the source here.
Geopolitics and Empire: And you
mentioned WHO. I’d like to just get your thoughts on
the WHO and the Big Pharma. There’s also some
analysts who are downplaying this news media hype of
the coronavirus. You’ve just said that it seems to
be lethal, but if we go back a decade to the 2009
swine flu, which I believe didn’t have too many
casualties, but I think profited greatly the
pharmaceutical companies. If I recall that back in
2009, many countries purchased great stocks
of the vaccines and they ended up not using anywhere
from 50 to 80% of the vaccines that they purchased.
You’ve previously stated in an interview
that the World Health Organization is a front for
Big Pharma if I’m not mistaken. Robert F. Kennedy
Jr. also agrees and he says, you know, 50% of WHO
funding comes from pharmaceutical companies. And
that the CDC itself is also severely compromised. What
are your thoughts on the WHO? The CDC?
Dr. Francis Boyle:Can’t
trust anything the WHO says because they’re all
bought and paid for by Big Pharma and when they work
in cahoots with the CDC, which is the United States
government, they work in cahoots with Fort Detrick,
so you can’t trust any of it.
However, the swine flu and yes, I agree pharma
made a lot of money, but that swine flu which I
looked at it, it did seem to me to be a
genetically modified biological warfare weapon.
It was a chimera of three different types of genetic
strains that someone put it together in a cocktail.
Fortunately, it was not as lethal as all of us fear.
So fine. But as I said, this figure I just gave to
you was Saturday from Lancet, which is a medical
publication, saying it’s a 15% fatality rate and an
83% infection rate. So it’s quite serious, I think,
far more serious than the swine flu.
As for big pharma, sure they’re all trying to
profit off this today as we speak. There was a big
article yesterday in the Wall Street Journal, all
big pharma trying to peddle whatever they can over
there in China even if it’s worthless and won’t
help. We do know, if you read the mainstream news
media they say there isn’t a vaccine.
Well, there is, it’s by the Pirbright
Institute in Britain that’s tied into their
biological warfare program over there. They
were behind the hoof and mouth disease outbreak over
there that wiped out their cattle herd and it leaked
out of there. So it’s clear they’re working on a
hoof and mouth biological warfare weapon, but the
vaccine is there. I have the patent for it here, I
haven’t had a chance to read the patent it’s about
25 pages long and my classes just resume. So
eventually, I get some free time and I’ll read the
patent.
You can’t patent a vaccine with the United States
patent office unless the science is there. So there
is a vaccine. Everyone’s lying about that, no one’s
pointing this out – there’s a vaccine but instead
big pharma wants to make money and the researchers
say, well, it’ll take three months and we’re racing
forward, you know. Everyone’s gonna make a buck off
of this, that’s for sure. But there is a vaccine, I
have the patent here. It’s been patented by the
United States government.
So obviously, I don’t know exactly how workable
it is, but it’s a vaccine. I don’t know why it isn’t
out there now? Why isn’t someone saying there is a
vaccine? Perhaps political leaders have already been
vaccinated for all I know, I really don’t know.
But there is a vaccine, Pirbright is well
known there in Britain and it’s tied into Fort
Detrick and CDC is tied into Fort Detrick too. So
they all know there’s a patented vaccine.
Geopolitics and Empire: And
just to get your comment on, I mean, something to
related to this, which was my next question. So I
think, I’m not sure if it’s that same Institute that
you just mentioned that has the patent. I read
somewhere that the Bill & Melinda Gates foundation
maybe funds or has some connection to that Institute
that has the patent.
Dr. Francis Boyle: I think they
do. The Bill & Melinda Gates information,
they fund this type of DNA genetically engineered
biological warfare work. That’s correct. So you
can’t trust anything they’re telling you that
somehow they’re out there trying to make the world a
better place. I mean, we have Bill Gates publicly
admitting that the world be a better place if there
were a lot less people. So the Bill & Melinda Gates
foundation, they are wolves in sheep’s clothing and
they are funding this type of stuff. Sure.
Geopolitics and Empire: And just
your comment, there was also the report that I guess
it was a consortium of companies which included the
Gates foundation that back in just two or three
months ago in October of 2019 they held a pandemic
exercise simulating an outbreak. I mean, what are
the chances specifically of a coronavirus and it was
called events 201. People can find this online
online and they gave a list of seven recommendations
for governments and international organizations to
take. I also find that kind of interesting how they
had this simulation.
Dr. Francis Boyle: That’s
correct. It raises that question, the origins of
what happened here. But right now, I’m just looking
at the evidence I have and applying Occam’s razor
and we know that Wuhan BSL-4 was research
developing, testing, SARS as a biological warfare
agent. So it could have been, they gave it this DNA
genetic engineering enhanced properties gain of
function which we do here in the West, in the United
States all the time. We have all sorts of
research that is clearly a bio warfare research that
has been approved by the National Institutes of
Health, it’s a joke. They know full well they are
proving all kinds of biological warfare research and
it gets funded by the United States government.
Geopolitics and Empire: And
you’ve also mentioned in the email to me that what
happened in the biosafety lab level 4 in Wuhan calls
into question the safety of all of these level 3and
4four labs around the world.
Dr. Francis Boyle:They’re
complete unsafe. BSL-3 and BSL-4 lab are only
designed for research development testing of offense
of biological warfare agents. In my opinion, they
serve no legitimate purpose at all. They should all
be shut down, every one of them. Even
assuming, they’re simply too dangerous. If you want,
there’s an excellent documentary called Anthrax
Wars by Nadler and Coen and I’m in there.
Repeatedly at the end, I say with respect to these
labs, three and four, this is a catastrophe waiting
to happen. Well, I’m afraid the catastrophe is now
happened. So there it is.
Geopolitics and Empire: Yeah, I
was just watching that documentary before we
connected and I recommend the listeners go check
that out. Do you see, in the future, any countries,
if we come to a conflict between US, EU, Israel,
Saudi Arabia, Iran, China, Russia, I mean you name
it. Do you see any of these countries actually
utilizing these biological weapons? I mean, it’s
illegal under international law but we know like in
the past that international law isn’t followed. Do
you think that there’s a real danger of this
escalating?
Dr. Francis Boyle: For sure.
That’s the only reason they develop these biological
weapons to eventually be used, sure. I mean, it’s
like the Manhattan project, we put all that money
into developing an atom bomb and even though it was
not needed to end world war II they still knew
Hiroshima and Nagasaki. So, yes, I think that’s
correct. And also these can be used
covertly. Anytime you see an unexplained sudden
outbreak of a disease like this anywhere in the
world, both for human beings and or animals, I
always suspect the bio warfare agent is at work.
I monitor the situation like I did at Wuhan until I
can reach a conclusion. Yes, they can be used as the
eyes for the United States government, today they
are fully prepared, armed, equipped, supplied to
wage a biological warfare with anthrax.
These other more exotic things I don’t know, but
they have the weapons, there are stockpiles. We have
to understand if you read Seymour Martin Hersh’s
book published about 1968, he won the Pulitzer
prize, he had the whole offensive US biological
warfare industry in there back before it was illegal
and criminal. Basically after 9/11, 2001,
that entire industry – offensive biological warfare
industry has been reconstituted here in the United
States with all these BSL-4 BSL-3 labs, well over
13,000, alleged scientists sort of like Dr. Mengele
working on these things. Other countries
have responded in kind like Russia, like China,
France is involved, Britain’s involved. Sure.
Geopolitics and Empire: I just
wanted to get your thoughts on, in the last few
years there was the Russian double agent spy Sergei
Skripal who had been allegedly poisoned with
Novichok out in Britain and I thought it was funny.
It just so happened where he was allegedly poisoned,
he was right in Porton down the British bio weapons
lab, I guess the world’s first bio weapons lab that
was created in 1916. I mean, I don’t know if you
have thoughts on that whole incident.
Dr. Francis Boyle: Yeah, I was
right down the street from Porton Down, so applying
Occam’s razor who you think might’ve been behind
this and it was not a nerve agent. A nerve agent
would have killed him immediately. This is Novichok.
It was something else like DX or something like
that. So fine. But, I would just say that I don’t
think that was a coincidence, but, you know, there
you go. There’s the, obviously there’s a lot of
speculation on that.
Geopolitics and Empire: Something
else that’s kind of interesting. You’ve written in
bio warfare and terrorism in your book and there’s
also Graeme Macqueen, I think your colleague who
wrote the anthrax deception the case for domestic
conspiracy…
Dr. Francis Boyle: Everything
you said in there. That’s correct.
Geopolitics and Empire: I’m
wondering also if this new war for biotechnological
dominance, whatever you want to call it, if it can
also be used kind of as a pretext for the
centralization of political power and the initiation
of wars like I guess it did in the 2003 Iraq war. I
mean, is this another danger that we get these
events like now this coronavirus and then
governments will call for a centralization of
greater power and taking away some of our civil
liberties?
Dr. Francis Boyle: Sure. If
you look at the October, 2001 anthrax attacks here
in the United States, that was clearly by elements
of the United States government that was behind
that. That was a super weapons grade anthrax with a
trillion spores per gram and it floated in the air
solely a very sophisticated biological weapons lab
like Fort Detrick could produce that. And they use
that anthrax attack including on Congress to brand
through the USA Patriot act which basically turned
the United States to a police state which is what we
have now. You have to understand the
Pentagon, Fort Dietrich made the dugway proving
ground still has a stockpile of that super weapons
grade anthrax that we saw in October of 2001 that
they can use the next time they want to do something
like that to further develop the American police
thing. Right.
Geopolitics and Empire: Is
there anything else you feel important to mention
regarding this Wuhan Coronavirus outbreak or
biological warfare or any other thoughts you’d like
to leave us with?
Dr. Francis Boyle:Well,
you just can’t believe anything the Chinese
government, the WHO, the CDC are telling. They’re
all lies because they know what’s going on here and
so you’re going to have to figure it out as fast as
you can. But in my opinion, as of this time
and I’m fully prepared to consider further evidence
on this, it does seem to me that this was a DNA
genetically engineered biological warfare agent
leaking out of Wuhan that has gain-of-function
properties which can make it more lethal. I think
they are probably doing something with SARS to make
it a lot more lethal and more infectious. And so for
that reason, you have to take extreme precautions
and they’re now finally admitted anyone within six
feet can be infected, whereas with SARS that was
about two feet. Well, that’s gaining a function
right there and that should be a tip off.
So, I guess you’re gonna have to protect
yourself. Laurie Garrett had a pretty good essay in
a foreign policy yesterday and she was over there
covering the SARS and she has very good advice in
there except that she took the SARS figure out two
to three feet and said well, you gotta stay to two
to three. I think you’ve got to stay at least six
feet away because this is gained function. It can
flow through the air and infect and it can get you
in the eyes. Any orifice, the mouth, maybe the ears,
we’re not sure at this point.
Geopolitics and Empire: I’m here
on the border of China in Kazakhstan and I was just
reading yesterday – today that they’re no longer
allowing Chinese citizens into Kazakhstan without a
medical paper, a medical check to get their visas to
enter Kazakhstan
Dr. Francis Boyle: Those
medical checks are worthless because this is just
public relations by all the governments involved
because there is a 14 day incubation period where
people can still be infected. So someone
could walk right through a medical inspection and
passing a gate into your country and then they come
down with the coronavirus. So that’s all
public relations in my opinion by governments and
they know it and they’re just sending people out
there with temperatures and things like that. It’s
not like SARS, this is more dangerous than SARS. As
I said, I think that Wuhan lab, we know they had
SARS in there that they were dealing with and I
think they enhanced it at and I’m afraid that’s
what we’re dealing with. But you know, I’m keeping
an open mind as to what other sources that might
have and I wasn’t prepared to say anything until
that Wuhan lab is right there and it’s dealing with
coronavirus. So again, apply Occam’s razor. It seems
to me that’s the simplest explanation here.
Geopolitics and Empire: I guess
my, one of my final question would be in the months
ahead, apart of what you say staying six feet away
from people. I’ve read taking high doses of vitamin
C and other things like this can help you. But, if
they come out as the situation develops and if it
gets worse and they come out with a coronavirus
vaccine, should people take it or not? What are
your thoughts?
Dr. Francis Boyle: Well, what I
would say is this. Right now, if you look at the
article at the Wall Street Journal, big pharma is
trying to sell all sorts of – they’re taking all
their drugs off the shelf and say well let’s see if
it works. Which is preposterous. Okay. The
scientists are saying, well, we can get you a
vaccine maybe two to three months but they’re not
tested. So what we do know, however, is that
Pirbright vaccine has been patented. So all I can
assume is that that might work. But I don’t think
I’d be taking any of these other vaccines. No, you
have no idea what’s in there. You’ll be the
Guinea pig for big pharma and everyone figures
they’re gonna make a lot of money here. So
I’ll keep my eye open on this and how it develop
but I wouldn’t trust anything they’re trying to sell
right now. They’re just pulling these things off the
shelf.
If they do come up with something in two to three
months, even that’s not going to be tested in
accordance with normal scientific protocol. So it’s
going to be a crap shoot. If it’s going to
help you, indeed it might not help you because
they’ll be using for this vaccines (these DNA
genetic engineered vaccines) they’ll be using live
coronavirus probably and sticking it in there and
giving you some live coronavirus on the theory
you’ll develop an immunity. That’s
the way a lot of these vaccines worked out, that’s
what happened with the Ebola vaccine that created
the Ebola pandemic there in West Africa. They were
testing out a vaccine on poor black Africans, as
usual, and this vaccine had live Ebola in it so it
gave them Ebola. So again, I’d be very
careful even if they do come up with these vaccines
two to three months from now, very careful. Why
would you want to inject the live coronavirus in
you?
Geopolitics and Empire: All
right. I don’t believe you have a strong online
presence. How can people best follow your work? I
suppose to search for interviews as well as get your
books.
Dr. Francis Boyle:Well,
basically I’m blackballed and blacklisted off all
the mainstream news media here on purpose. As far as
I can figure out, the US government gave an order
that I should not be interviewed by anyone, so I’m
not. I guess you could just put my name in
there under Google, Google alert, and some
interviews might come up. What happened was, right
after the anthrax attacks of 9/11 2001, I was giving
a lecture out at Harvard m Alma Mater. I was
running a panel on biological warfare for the
council for responsible genetics and it was at
Harvard Divinity School and as I was going in, there
was a Fox camera crew there from Boston and I said
it looks to me like this has come out of the US
government lab. We know they do research and testing
on anthrax. Then I said the same thing there at
Harvard then I gave an interview to a radio station
in Washington, D C then I gave an interview on that
to the BBC. So the whole world saw it and at that
point I was completely cut off and I’ve been cut
off ever since. So you probably not going to hear
too many interviews from me here. As for my book.
Biowarfare & Terrorism, you can just get it at
amazon.com. That picks up the story pretty much from
9/11 2001 and until it went to press and then there
are interviews I’d given to an investigative
reporter, Sherwood Ross and a big one I just sent
you and you might want to put that on your web page.
That was pretty comprehensive.
Geopolitics and Empire: Yeah, I
read that as well and I’ll include the link in the
description of this interview so people can go check
that out. You’re not the only academic I know and
have heard of others that similar things have
happened and that’s just I guess the price we pay
for telling the truth. Again, for listeners, if
people wanted to have a broader context and deeper
understanding of what’s happening today especially
with biological warfare as well as us foreign policy
and international affairs, I urge you to get Dr.
Francis Boyle’s books and listen to his interviews
as well as his colleagues book. Graeme Macqueen, The
Anthrax Deception, The Case For Domestic Conspiracy.
Thank you for being with us, Dr. Boyle.
Dr. Francis Boyle: Well, thank
you and again, please understand these are my
current opinions. I could change my opinion here
based on more evidence. So I’m just looking at the
evidence out there as I see it and you have to
understand there is so much disinformation, lies and
propaganda that it’s kind of very difficult to
distinguish truth from fact. I’m doing the best job
I can here.
Francis Boyle is a professor of international law
at the University of Illinois College of Law. He
drafted the U.S. domestic implementing legislation
for the Biological Weapons Convention, known as the
Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, that
was approved unanimously by both Houses of the U.S.
Congress and signed into law by President George H.W.
Bush.
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)