By Ellen Brown
February 12, 2020 "Information
Clearing House" -
While U.S. advocates and local
politicians struggle to get their first
public banks chartered, Mexico’s new
president has begun construction on 2,700 branches
of a government-owned bank to be
completed in 2021, when it will be the
largest bank in the country. At a press
conference on Jan. 6, he said the
neoliberal model had failed; private
banks were not serving the poor and
people outside the cities, so the
government had to step in.
Andrés Manuel López Obrador (known as
AMLO) has been compared to the United
Kingdom’s left-wing opposition leader
Jeremy Corbyn, with one notable
difference: AMLO is now in power. He and
his left-wing coalition won by a
landslide in Mexico’s 2018 general
election, overturning the Institutional
Revolutionary Party (PRI) that had ruled
the country for much of the past
century. Called Mexico’s “first
full-fledged left-wing experiment,”
AMLO’s election marks a dramatic change
in the political direction of the
country. AMLO wrote in his 2018 book “A
New Hope for Mexico,” “In Mexico the
governing class constitutes a gang of
plunderers…. Mexico will not grow strong
if our public institutions remain at the
service of the wealthy elites.”
The new president has held to his
campaign promises. In 2019, his first
year in office, he did what Donald Trump
pledged to do — “drain the swamp” — purging
the government of technocrats and
institutions he considered corrupt,
profligate or impeding the
transformation of Mexico after 36 years
of failed market-focused neoliberal
policies.
Are You Tired Of
The Lies And
Non-Stop Propaganda?
|
Other accomplishments have included
substantially increasing
the minimum wage while cutting top
government salaries and oversize
pensions; making small loans and grants
directly to farmers;
guaranteeing crop prices for key
agricultural crops; launching
programs to benefit youth, the
disabled and the elderly; and initiating
a $44
billion infrastructure plan. López
Obrador’s goal, he says, is to construct
a “new paradigm” in economic policy that
improves human welfare, not just
increases gross domestic product.
The End of the Neoliberal Era
To deliver on that promise, in July
2019 AMLO converted the publicly owned
federal savings bank Bansefi into a
“Bank of the Poor” (Banco del
Bienestar or “Welfare Bank”). He
said on Jan. 6 that the neoliberal era
had eliminated all the state-owned banks
but one, which he had gotten approval to
expand with 2,700 new branches. Added to
the existing 538 branches of the former
Bansefi, that will bring the total in
two years to 3,238
branches, far outstripping any other
bank in the country. (Banco Azteca,
currently the largest by number of
branches, has 1,860.) Digital banking
will also be developed. Speaking
to a local group in December, AMLO
said his goal was for the Bank of the
Poor to reach 13,000 branches, more than
all the private banks in the country
combined.
At a
news conference on Jan. 8, he
explained why this new bank was needed:
There are more than 1,000
municipalities that don’t have a
bank branch. We’re dispersing
[welfare] resources but we don’t
have a way to do it. . . . People
have to go to branches that are two,
three hours away. If we don’t bring
these services close to the people,
we’re not going to bring development
to the people. …
They’re already building. I’ll
invite you within two months, three
at the most, to the inauguration of
the first branches because they’re
already working, they’re getting the
land … because we have to do it
quickly.
The president said the 10 billion
pesos ($530.4 million) needed to build
the new branches would come from
government savings; and that 5 million
had already been transferred to the
Banco del Bienestar, which would pass
the funds to the Secretariat of Defense,
whose engineers were responsible for
construction. The military will also be
used to transport physical funds to the
branches for welfare payments. AMLO added,
“They are helping me. They are propping
me up. The military has behaved very
well and they don’t back down at all.
They always tell me ‘yes you can, yes we
do, go.’ ”
To concerns that the government-owned
bank would draw deposits away from
commercial banks and might compete in
other ways, such as making interest-free
loans to small businesses, AMLO
countered:
There’s no reason to be
complaining about us building these
branches. … [I]f private banks want
to build branches, they have every
right to go to the towns and build
their branches, but as they won’t
because they believe that it’s not
[good] business, we have to do it .
. . it’s our social responsibility,
the state can’t shirk its social
responsibility.
Issues with the Central Bank
While the legislature has approved
the new bank, Mexico’s central bank can
still block it if bank regulations are
breached. Ricardo Delfín, who works at
the international accounting firm KPMG,
told the newspaper La
Razón that if the money to fund the
bank comes from a loan from the federal
government rather than from capital, it
will adversely affect the bank’s
“Capitalization Ratio.” But AMLO
contends that the bank will be
self-sufficient. Funding for
construction will come from federal
savings from other programs, and the
bank’s operating expenses will be
covered by small commissions paid on
each transaction by customers, most of
whom are welfare recipients. Branches
will be built on land owned by the
government or donated, and software
companies have offered to advise for
free.
About the central bank, he said:
We’re going to speak with those
from the Bank of México respecting
the autonomy of the Bank of México.
We have to educate them because for
them this is an anachronism, even
sacrilege, because they have other
ideas. But we’ve arrived here [in
government] after telling the people
that the neoliberal economic policy
was going to change. . . .
There shouldn’t be obstacles. How
is the Bank of México going to stop
us from having a [bank] branch that
disperses resources in favor of the
people? What damage does that do?
Whom does it harm?
AMLO has repeatedly promised not to
interfere in the business of the central
bank, which has been autonomous for the
past quarter of a century. But he
has also said that he would like its
mandate expanded from just preserving
the value of the peso by fighting
inflation to include fostering growth.
The concern, according
to The Financial Times, is that he
might use the central bank to fund
government programs, following in the
footsteps of Argentina’s former
President Cristina Fernández de
Kirchner, “whose heterodox policies led
to high inflation and, many economists
believe, the country’s current crisis.”
Mark Weisbrot counters in The New
York Times that Argentina’s problems
were caused, not by printing money to
fund domestic development, but by a
massive foreign debt. Hyperinflation
actually happened under Fernández de
Kirchner’s successor, President Mauricio
Macri, who replaced her in 2015. The
public debt grew from 53% to more than
86% of GDP, inflation soared from 18% to
54%, short-term interest rates shot up
to 75%, and poverty increased from 27%
to 40%.
In an upset
election in August 2019, the
outraged Argentinian public re-elected
Fernández de Kirchner as vice president
and her former head of the cabinet of
ministers as president, restoring the
12-year Kirchner legacy begun by her
husband, Nestor Kirchner, in 2003 and
considered by Weisbrot to be among the
most successful presidencies in the
Western Hemisphere.
More appropriate than Argentina as a
model for what can be achieved by a
government working in partnership with
its central bank is that of Japan, where
Prime Minister Shinzo Abe has funded his
stimulus programs by selling government
bonds directly to the Bank of Japan. The
BOJ now holds nearly 50% of the
government’s debt, yet consumer price
inflation remains low — so
low that the BOJ cannot get the
figure up even to its 2% target.
Other Funding Options
AMLO is unlikely to go that route,
because he has vowed not to interfere
with the central bank; but analysts say
he needs to introduce some sort of
economic stimulus, because Mexico’s GDP
has slipped in the last year. The
Mexican president has criticized GDP as
the ultimate standard, advocating
instead for a model of development that
incorporates wealth distribution and
access to education, health, housing and
culture into its measurements.
But as
Kurt Hackbarth warned in Jacobin in
December, “To fully unfurl [his] program
without simply ransacking other line
items to pay for it will require doing
something AMLO has up to now
categorically ruled out: raising taxes
on the rich and large corporations
which, not surprisingly, make out like
utter bandits in Mexico’s rigged
financial system.”
AMLO has continually vowed, however,
not to raise taxes on the rich. Instead
he has enlisted
Mexico’s business magnates as investors in
public-private partnerships, allowing
him to avoid the “tequila trap” that
brought down Argentina and Mexico itself
in earlier years — getting locked into
debt to foreign investors and the
International Monetary Fund. Mexico’s
business leaders seem happy to invest in
the country, despite some slippage in
GDP.
As noted by Carlos Slim, Mexico’s
wealthiest man, “Debt didn’t go up,
there is no fiscal deficit and inflation
came down.” In November 2019, the
Economy Secretariat reported that
foreign direct investment showed a 7.8%
increase in the first nine months of
that year compared with the same period
in 2018, reaching its second highest
level ever; and at the end of 2019 the peso
was up around 4%. Stocks also rose
4.5%, and inflation dropped from 4.8% to
3%.
Partnering with local businessleaders
is politically expedient, but public/private
partnerships can be expensive; and
as U.K. Professor
Richard Werner points out, tapping
up private investors merely recirculates
existing money in the economy. Better
would be to borrow directly from banks,
which create new bank money when they
lend, as the Bank
of England has confirmed. This new
money then circulates in the economy,
stimulating productivity.
Today, the best model for that
approach is China, which funds
infrastructure by borrowing from its own
state-owned banks. Like all banks, they
create loans as bank credit on their
books, which is then repaid with the
proceeds of the projects created with
the loans. There is no need to tap up
the central bank or rich
investors or the tax base.
Government banks can create money on
their books just as central banks and
private banks do.
For Mexico, however, using its public
banks as China does would be something
for the future, if at all. Meanwhile,
AMLO has been a trailblazer in showing
how a national public banking system can
be initiated quickly and efficiently.
The key, it seems, is just to have the
political will — along with massive
support from the public, the
legislature, local business leaders and
the military.
Ellen Brown chairs the Public
Banking Institute and has written
thirteen books, including her latest, Banking
on the People: Democratizing Money in
the Digital Age. She also co-hosts
a radio program on PRN.FM called “It’s
Our Money.” Her 300+ blog articles
are posted at www.EllenBrown.com
Do you agree or
disagree? Post your comment here