Russia has an alternative already in place in case
it is cut from SWIFT — and short-term setbacks would
likely be followed by long-term gains
By Matthew Allen
January 18, 2020 "Information
Clearing House" - Russia has successfully
developed and implemented an alternative should it
be excluded from international banking systems,
according to a recent report.
As far as western sanctions go, by far Russia's
largest vulnerability is in its banking sector,
which for better or for worse is tied to the hip
with international banking.
If Russia wishes to maintain the status quo,
there's not much that can be done about this
dependency. But shortly after sanctions were
announced in 2014, Moscow set out to prepare for the
worst-case scenario: being cut off from the
Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication
(SWIFT) system.
In layman's terms, SWIFT allows for fast and
(allegedly) secure international financial
transfers. In fifty years when you are able to use
your Bank of America debit card on the Moon (for a
low fee of 2,000 moon rubles), it will be because of
SWIFT or a system similar to it.
There are two issues surrounding SWIFT "cut-off"
for Russia: 1. Is it likely to happen? and 2. Is
Russia prepared for it?
Regarding the first question: The reality is that
Washington's European poodles realize that cutting
Russia from SWIFT would be a disaster. In
2015, European Central Bank policymaker Ewald
Nowotny "warned against kicking Russian banks out
of the SWIFT payments transfer system as part
of tighter sanctions on Moscow."
According to Nowotny:
Such a move "we would see as very
problematic because it could perhaps undermine
confidence in this system," the governor
of Austria's central bank told reporters
in Brussels after meeting European Commissioner
Pierre Moscovici.
Of course, this hasn't stopped Europe and
Washington from threatening to pull the SWIFT plug.
Are You Tired Of
The Lies And
Non-Stop Propaganda?
|
We have a very low opinion of European and
American geopolitical strategy; that being said, we
have a hard time believing that Washington would
seriously go forward with axing Russia's access to
SWIFT.
If it did though, things would certainly get
interesting. Which leads us to our second question:
Is Russia prepared?
In the short-term: Definitely not. In the
long-term it could be one of the best things to ever
happen to Russia and all other nations that are
tired of Washington's economic and military
shenanigans.
According to a recent report:
If the Society for Worldwide
Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT) is
shut down in Russia, the country’s banking
system will not crash, according to Central Bank
Governor Elvira Nabiullina. Russia has a
substitute.
"There were threats that we can be
disconnected from SWIFT. We have finished
working on our own payment system, and if
something happens, all operations in SWIFT
format will work inside the country. We have
created an alternative," Nabiullina said at a
meeting with President Vladimir Putin on
Wednesday.
She also added that 90 percent of
ATMs in Russia are ready to accept the Mir
payment system, a domestic version of Visa and
MasterCard.
Izvestia daily reported that as of
January 2016, 330 Russian banks had been
connected to the SWIFT alternative, the system
for transfer of financial messages (SPFS).
The alternative system is far from fully
functional, however: "It doesn’t work from 9pm to
5am Moscow time and costs up to five cents per wire
transfer, which is regarded expensive."
And using Crimea
as an example (Western banks refuse to transfer
foreign currency payments from Crimea via the SWIFT
transaction system), there would be numerous
headaches that would likely last a very long time.
But as Naked Capitalism wrote
back in November, 2014:
[S]etting up a payments channel
outside SWIFT can enable Russia to establish a
financial system for those who don’t want to be
subject to US dictates.
Banks that did business with Iran, both
before and after the SWIFT sanctions, were hit
with money-laundering sanctions. The payments
were dollar payments and were cleared thought
the banks’ New York branches, making them
subject to US law.
All dollar transactions between banks are
settled at the end of the business day in New
York; interbank payment systems ultimately
depend on a central bank backstop, and many
large payments run over the Fed’s interbank
system, Fedwire.
[...]
In addition, there are likely
businesses in Europe that are not keen about how
complying with the EU sanctions against Russia
is hurting their business. It isn’t clear how
many would be willing to walk on the wild side
and defy sanctions, but processing transactions
through a Russian-controlled payment system
would be far less susceptible to detection than
through SWIFT.
In other words, this measure is
intended to reduce the effectiveness of using
the dollar dominance in payments as a weapon.
Whether the Russians can launch a robust enough
system quickly is an open question, but this is
a sensible defensive and potentially offensive
measure. It may have longer-term ramifications
if other countries that are not happy with the
US decide to employ it for practical or
political reasons.
For Washington, any short-term gains from cutting
Russia off from SWIFT would almost certainly be
followed by long-term economic and strategic
benefits for Moscow.
We know this because every attempt to "sanction"
Russia has had a similar result.
This article was originally published by "
Russia Insider" -
Do you agree or disagree? Post
your comment here