If the US refuses to
withdraw its troops they will eventually be
forced out as they were in 2011
By Abdel Bari Atwan
January 12, 2020 "Information
Clearing House" -
President Donald
Trump has no legal or moral right to reject the
Iraqi government’s officially submitted request for
the withdrawal of all US forces from Iraq. His
refusal to pull them out defies both the Iraqi
parliament’s vote and the agreement signed by the
two sides that provided legal cover for the
deployment of 5,300 American personnel in the
country to train Iraqi forces and help them fight
the Islamic State group (Daesh). Iraq no longer
needs nor wants that assistance, and certainly not
from an aggressive occupying power.
Washington’s stance betrays long-term hostile
intentions against Iraq and the entire Middle East
region.
Even more ominously, the Pentagon now says it is
studying plans to expand the NATO presence in Iraq.
This means bringing in additional troops and
armament in open defiance of the Iraqi government
and parliament – effectively mounting a repeat
invasion of the country, under equally spurious
pretexts as the first time.
In
addition, Trump has been reiterating that if the
Iraqis insist on the Americans leaving, they will
first have to “payback” the costs incurred by the US
in the country, “otherwise we’ll stay there’’. He
also threatened to confiscate billions of dollars of
Iraqi government funds held in the US and subject
the country to draconian economic sanctions “as
they’ve never seen before.”
By
refusing to withdraw its troops and threatening to
reinforce the NATO presence, the US is continuing to
treat Iraq as an occupied territory, showing utter
contempt both for its sovereignty and its government
– a government that came to power as a result of the
political process the US itself imposed on the
country.
Are You Tired Of
The Lies And
Non-Stop Propaganda?
|
Outgoing prime minister Adel
Abdelmahdi was right to warn the Americans
that deploying forces and materiel in or
conducting over-flights of the country
without the government’s permission would be
an affront to the Iraqi state and people.
But that would be nothing new. When Trump
and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo visited
the Ain al-Assad base during the
Thanksgiving and Christmas holidays
respectively, they did not even inform the
authorities in Baghdad that they were in the
country. Treating the government with
contempt is not merely a product of recent
developments.
As
for Trump’s demand that Iraq reimburses the US for
the costs of invading and occupying the country,
this is not just an insult to Iraq but to the
intelligence of all humanity. Iraq did not ask to be
invaded and occupied. It was subjected to naked
aggression on fake pretexts preceded by a crippling
12-year blockade, which between them caused the
deaths of more than a million Iraqis. People are
continuing to die to this day from cancers caused by
the uranium-tipped munitions with which the country
was the bombardment. It is the US that should be
paying compensation and reparations to Iraq for the
untold death and devastation it caused.
The US is responsible for triggering the latest
crisis to explode in the region, first by ditching
the JCPOA nuclear agreement with Iran, and then by
assassinating Gen. Qasem Soleimani and his comrade
Abu-Mahdi al –Mohandis, deputy commander of Iraq’s
Hashd ash-Shaabi (Popular Mobilization) forces. The
reported arrest of a three-member spy cell at
Baghdad airport that allegedly supplied information
about the pair’s arrival on a civilian flight from
Damascus should shed light on this matter.
Armed resistance by the Iraqi people forced American
troops to quit the country at the end of 2011, and
they will repeat this heroic feat if they have to
until the day comes when the US begs the Iraqi
authorities – as it is currently doing with the
Taliban – to ensure a safe departure for its forces.
The US cannot expect to trample on people’s dignity,
violate their sovereignty and murder their leaders
in such provocative fashion without provoking a
ferocious response. The claim that the US is too
powerful for anyone to take on is a deception that
must be challenged. The country that is now trying
to reconstitute its occupation is the same one that
retreated in ignominious defeat from Iraq in 2011 —
and it is weaker now than it was then, no longer
holding sway as the world’s unchallenged hegemon.
Iraq cannot and must not submit to this extortion,
be it financial or military. It is not a banana
republic or an American dependency or protectorate,
but an ancient country with a proud and resilient
people. It will resist this second occupation and
fight back as it did the first time.
This article was originally published by "Raialyoum"
-
Do you agree or disagree? Post
your comment here
==See Also==
The occupation continues :
US is not willing to
withdraw troops from Iraq, says Pompeo
Pompeo: US troops ‘to
continue mission’ in Iraq |
The views expressed in this article
are solely those of the author and
do not necessarily reflect the
opinions of Information Clearing
House. |
|
|
Search
Information Clearing House
|
===
|