The Democrats pass Pelosi’s phony antiwar
resolutionBy Patrick Martin
January 10, 2020 "Information
Clearing House" - The resolution adopted
by the US House of Representatives Thursday evening
“directing” President Trump not to go to war with
Iran without congressional approval is a political
fraud. It has two political purposes: to allow the
Democratic Party to pretend it is opposed to war
without actually imposing the slightest restriction
on the military actions of the Trump administration;
and to cement the ties between the Democrats and
large sections of the military-intelligence
apparatus who were clearly blindsided by Trump’s
decision to assassinate Iranian General Qassem
Suleimani.
The impotent character of the House vote is
demonstrated by the decision of the Democratic
leadership to introduce it as a “concurrent
resolution,” a designation generally reserved for
empty formalities, statements of opinion by Congress
that do not go to the president for his signature
and therefore do not have the force of law.
While House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, echoed by
pro-Democratic media pundits, claimed that the
Democrats would compel Trump to obtain congressional
authorization before going to war, the resolution
does no such thing. After passing the House by a
near-party-line vote of 224-194, it goes to the
Senate, where the Republicans have a 53-47 majority.
If the Senate should approve it, the resolution
would simply be published as a declaration of the
wishes of Congress. For good reason, House
Republicans sneered at the action as a vote on a
“press release.”
At her press conference Thursday before the vote,
Pelosi claimed, “Today, to honor our duty to keep
the American people safe, the House will move
forward with a War Powers Resolution to limit the
president’s military actions regarding Iran.” She
tried to make a virtue out of the nonbinding
character of the resolution, saying: “This is a
statement by the Congress of the United States. And
I will not have that statement be diminished by
whether the president will veto it or not.”