What the U.S. Torture Program Looked
Like to the Tortured
By
Carol Rosenberg
© Abu Zubaydah,
Courtesy Mark P. Denbeaux
Caution: This article contains
graphic details that may be distressing
for some readers.
December 06, 2019 "Information
Clearing House"
-
One shows the prisoner nude and strapped to a
crude gurney, his entire body clenched as he is
waterboarded by an unseen interrogator. Another
shows him with his wrists cuffed to bars so high
above his head he is forced on to his tiptoes,
with a long wound stitched on his left leg and a
howl emerging from his open mouth. Yet another
depicts a captor smacking his head against a
wall.
They are sketches drawn in captivity by the
Guantánamo Bay prisoner known as Abu Zubaydah,
self-portraits of the torture he was subjected
to during the four years he was held in secret
prisons by the CIA.
Published here for the first time, they are
gritty and highly personal depictions that put
flesh, bones and emotion on what until now had
sometimes been portrayed in popular culture in
sanitised or inaccurate ways: the so-called
enhanced interrogations techniques used by the
United States in secret overseas prisons during
a feverish pursuit of Al Qaeda after the Sept.
11, 2001, attacks.
© Abu Zubaydah,
Courtesy Mark P. Denbeaux
In each illustration, Mr Zubaydah — the first
person to be subject to the
interrogation torture program approved
by President George W. Bush’s administration —
portrays the particular techniques as he says
they were used on him at a CIA black site in
Thailand in August 2002.
Are You Tired Of
The Lies And
Non-Stop Propaganda?
|
They demonstrate how, more than a decade
after the Obama administration outlawed the
program — and then went on to partly
declassify a Senate study that found the CIA
lied about both its effectiveness and its
brutality — the final chapter of the black
sites has yet to be written.
© Abu Zubaydah,
Courtesy Mark P. Denbeaux
Mr Zubaydah, 48, drew them this year at
Guantánamo for inclusion in a 61-page report,
“How America Tortures,” by his lawyer, Mark P.
Denbeaux, a professor at the Seton Hall
University School of Law in Newark and some of
Mr Denbeaux’s students.
The report uses firsthand accounts, internal
Bush administration memos, prisoners’ memories
and the 2014 Senate Intelligence Committee
report to analyse the interrogation program. The
program was initially set up for Mr Zubaydah,
who was mistakenly believed to be a top Qaeda
lieutenant.
He was captured in a gun battle in
Faisalabad, Pakistan, in March 2002, gravely
injured, including a bad wound to his left
thigh, and was sent to the CIA’s overseas prison
network.
After an internal debate over whether Mr
Zubaydah was forthcoming to FBI interrogators,
the agency hired two C.I.A. contract
psychologists to create the now-outlawed program
that would use violence, isolation and sleep
deprivation on more than 100 men in secret
sites, some described as dungeons, staffed by
secret guards and medical officers.
Descriptions of the methods began leaking out
more than a decade ago, occasionally in
wrenching detail but sometimes with little more
than stick-figure depictions of what prisoners
went through.
© Abu Zubaydah,
Courtesy Mark P. Denbeaux
But these newly released drawings depict
specific CIA techniques that were approved,
described and categorised in memos prepared in
2002 by the Bush administration and capture the
perspective of the person being tortured, Mr
Zubaydah, a Palestinian whose real name is Zayn
al-Abidin Muhammad Husayn.
He was the first person known to be
waterboarded by the CIA — he endured it 83 times
— and was the first person known to be crammed
into a small confinement box as part of what the
Seton Hall study called “a constantly rotating
barrage” of methods meant to break what
interrogators believed was his resistance.
© Abu Zubaydah,
Courtesy Mark P. Denbeaux
Subsequent intelligence analysis showed that
while Mr Zubaydah was a jihadist, he had no
advance knowledge about the 9/11 attacks, nor
was he a member of Al Qaeda.
He has never been charged with a crime and
documents released through the courts show that
military prosecutors have no plans to do so.
He is held at the base’s most secretive
prison, Camp 7, where he drew these sketches not
as artwork, whose release from Guantánamo is now
forbidden, but as legal material that was
reviewed and cleared — with one redaction — for
inclusion in the study. Other drawings he has
done of himself during his imprisonment were
published last year by ProPublica.
© Abu Zubaydah,
Courtesy Mark P. Denbeaux
Waterboarding
In this drawing, the prisoner portrays
himself as nude on the waterboard, immobilised
as water pours down on his hooded head, his
right foot contorted in pain. The image
contrasts with some others seen in popular
culture; an exhibit at the Spy Museum in
Washington, for example, shows a guard pouring
water onto the face of a prisoner who is neatly
clad in what looks like a prison jumpsuit.
Mr Zubaydah’s self-portrait also shows a
design detail not present in most depictions — a
drop-down hinge to tilt the prisoner’s head.
Restraints hold down his wounded thigh.
The Senate Intelligence Committee study of
the C.I.A. program concluded that waterboarding
and other techniques were “brutal and far worse
than the C.I.A. represented.” Its use induced
convulsions, vomiting and left Mr Zubaydah
“completely unresponsive, with bubbles rising
through his open, full mouth.”
In a now declassified account he provided his
lawyer in 2008, Mr. Zubaydah described the first
of what would be 83 waterboarding sessions this
way: “They kept pouring water and concentrating
on my nose and my mouth until I really felt I
was drowning and my chest was just about to
explode from the lack of oxygen.”
Stress Positions
Accounts by detainees in different black
sites have differed on how this method was used.
In his illustration, Mr Zubaydah shows himself
nude and shackled at the wrists to a bar above
his head, forced to stand on tiptoe.
In his account, as reported by his lawyers,
he was still recovering from what the CIA had
described as a large wound in his thigh, and he
tried to balance his weight on the other leg.
“Long hours went by while I was standing in
that position,” he told his lawyers. “My hands
were tight to the upper bars.”
Some guards, he said, “noticed the colour of
my hands,” moved him to a chair “and the
interrogation vertigo resumed — the cold, the
hunger, the little sleep and the intense
vomiting, which I didn’t know whether it was
caused by the cold, the ‘Ensure’ or the noise.”
(The CIA put its prisoners on liquid diets in
its program of so-called learned helplessness.)
Short Shackling
Mr Zubaydah, who is not known to have formal
art training, drew himself in a hood, shackled
in the foetal position and tethered by a chain
to a cell bar to constrict his movement. In
granting the CIA approval to use a technique
similar to this, Jay S. Bybee, a former
assistant attorney general, noted in an 18-page
memo dated Aug. 1, 2002, that “through observing
Zubaydah in captivity, you have noted that he
appears to be quite flexible despite his wound.”
He also noted in the authorization, addressed
to the C.I.A.’s acting general counsel at the
time, John A. Rizzo, that the agency asserted
that “these positions are not designed to
produce the pain associated with contortions or
twisting of the body.”
Walling
This image emerged from Guantánamo with a
black redaction box over Mr Zubaydah’s depiction
of the face of his interrogator.
It shows the prisoner’s captor tightly
winding a towel around his neck as he smashes
the back of his head against what Mr Zubaydah
recalled was a wooden wall covering a cement
wall.
“He kept banging me against the wall,” he
said of the experience, which he described as
leaving him blind “for a few instants.” With
each bang, he said, he would fall to the floor,
be dragged by the plastic-tape-wrapped towel
“which caused bleeding in my neck,” and then
receive a slap on his face.
In a 2017 deposition as part of a lawsuit
that was eventually settled, James E. Mitchell,
a former CIA contract psychologist who devised
the techniques with a colleague, John Bruce
Jessen, said walling was “discombobulating” and
meant to stir up a prisoner’s inner ears. “If
it’s painful, you’re doing it wrong,” he said.
Large Confinement Box
In this drawing, Mr Zubaydah is shaved, nude,
shackled in such a way he cannot stand up and by
his account, is sitting on a bucket meant to
serve as a toilet.
“I found myself in total darkness,” he said.
“The only spot I could sit in was on top of the
bucket, for the place was very tight.”
In his account, Mr Zubaydah describes being
confined in “a large wooden box that looked like
a wooden casket.” The first time he saw it,
guards were turning it vertical and a man in
black clothes and a military jacket announced,
“From now on, this is going to be your home.”
Mr Zubaydah portrays himself in the drawings
with both eyes. A photograph of him early during
his time at Guantánamo shows him wearing an eye
patch after the removal of an injured eye.
Small Confinement Box
The small box is similar to the one on
display at the Spy Museum where, during a visit,
children could be seen crawling inside.
In his account, included in the Seton Hall
report, Mr Zubaydah describes his time in what
he called “the dog box” as “so painful.” He
adds: “As soon as they locked me up inside the
box, I tried my best to sit up, but in vain, for
the box was too short. I tried to take a curled
position but to no vain, for it was too tight.”
He was immobilised and shackled in the fetal
position, as he described it, for “countless
hours,” experiencing muscle contractions.
“The very strong pain,” he said, “made me
scream unconsciously.”
Sleep Deprivation
Mr Zubaydah recalled that agents used a
method of “horizontal sleep deprivation” that
involved shackling him flat on the ground in
such a painful position that it made it
impossible to sleep.
The CIA justified sleep deprivation by saying
it “focuses the detainee’s attention on his
current situation rather than ideological
goals.” In approving this and other techniques
in August 2002, Mr. Bybee said the C.I.A. had
said it would not deprive Mr Zubaydah of sleep
for “more than 11 days at a time.”
In the Seton Hall study, Mr Zubaydah
recounted being deprived of sleep for “maybe two
or three weeks or even more.”
“It felt like an eternity,” he added, “to the
point that I found myself falling asleep despite
the water being thrown at me by the guard.”
This article was produced in partnership with
the Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting.
This article was originally published by
"MSN"
- -
Do you agree or disagree?
Post your comment here