Princeton Study: The U.S. Is Not ‘Losing’ Its
Democracy, It’s Already Long Gone
By Richard Enos
The Facts: - A Princeton
University study found that the United
States operates much more as an
Oligarchy than as a Democracy.
Reflect On: - Can the current
system be fixed or do we need to walk
away from it to get what we really want?
November 22/23, 2019
"Information
Clearing House" -The
notion that citizens of the United States don’t
actually live in a democracy has been picking up
steam for decades, with scars from economic, social
and political decay inflicting themselves ever more
deeply into our psyches as the years move on.
You would think
that, with the rise of science and technology, we
would have been able to build a far more prosperous
nation. Instead, we have seen a vast reduction in
our standard of living, and are being forced to work
longer and harder in increasingly menial and
unfulfilling jobs across the board. We are ever more
being subjected to the control-hungry vicissitudes
of mega-corporations that are swallowing up American
entrepreneurship and prosperous self-employment.
The notion that we
as individuals are failing ourselves as a nation,
and somehow have earned the massive and growing
national debt as a result of our own poor decisions
and ineptitude, is only valid if you still believe
that we are living in a democracy, where the
majority of individuals directly make policy. If in
fact the United States ever fully operated this way,
the least we can say is that our democracy is
currently broken.
Of course, if you
are in the small coterie of economic elites at the
top of the pyramid, you don’t feel that anything is
broken. In fact, in the back rooms where all the
important meetings take place, you likely spend part
of the time congratulating each other because things
are going exactly according to plan.
Are You Tired Of
The Lies And
Non-Stop Propaganda?
A study by two
political scientists at Princeton and Northwestern,
Martin Gilens and Benjamin Page, analyzed 1,779
recent policy outcomes found that “economic elites
and organized groups representing business interests
have substantial independent impacts on U.S.
government policy,” while average citizens “have
little or no independent influence.”
The research had two
parts: First, they measured the amount of political
influence various groups have in America. Then, they
checked this against some technical definitions of
democracy, oligarchy, and other forms of government.
In our latest
episode of The Collective Evolution Show on
CETV, Joe Martino and
I discuss this study and the broader notion of
whether the system itself is simply broken and can
be fixed, or if we should start thinking about how
we can move away from it altogether. The opening
clip is below, and for the full episode and hundreds
of other inspiring shows and interviews, you can
start a free 7-day trial
on CETV today.
The
Wealthy Have More Influence
The chart below
shows how much political influence different groups
have in America today. Not only do the wealthy have
the most influence, ordinary voters have basically
none.
To have “political
influence” in this case means that Congress responds
to you by passing the laws and policies you like.
Low influence means you’re ignored — Congress passes
laws that have no relationship to what you want.
Special interest
groups also have sway over public policy. The
researchers divided them into two types. “Mass”
interest groups, which represent large groups of
organized citizens, have a small amount of power.
Business groups, like trade associations, have a
moderate amount, likely because they can afford to
spend more on lobbying and political donations.
None of this means
that ordinary people never get what they
want from Congress. Sometimes public opinion data
matched up with things Congress actually did.
However the vast majority were also outcomes favored
by the wealthy and business interests. Statistically
speaking, the government doesn’t care what 90% of
Americans think.
America Is an Oligarchy
The authors defined
four possible systems we might have: (1) democracy,
(2) oligarchy, or semi-democratic systems dominated
by (3) interest groups generally or (4) business
groups especially. You can look at the chart below
and judge for yourself: America in 2014 matches
mostly with the oligarchy model — an oligarchy of
wealthy individuals. In fact, the general public has
even less influence than it does in a typical
oligarchy model.
The problem here
isn’t the existence of wealth, or that wealthy
Americans have political opinions. It’s that the
government is representing only 10% of the American
people. Everyone else is living with something less
than democracy.
The authors make the
following observations: Organized groups regularly
lobby and fraternize with public officials; move
through revolving doors between public and private
employment; provide self-serving information to
officials; draft legislation; and spend a great deal
of money on election campaigns.
At its heart, this
is a problem of corruption – caused by money in our
political system. Such corruption is fundamentally
opposed to the ideals of our republic because “the
public is likely to be a more certain guardian of
its own interests than any feasible alternative.”
The
Takeaway
While some might
argue that introducing new campaign finance laws as
well as anti-corruption legislation is the answer,
we have to remember that the foxes remain in charge
of the hen house, and there is always resistance
from lawmakers to introduce, implement, and enforce
legislation that will reduce their power
and ultimately find them guilty of having obtained
their power through corrupt means. More than likely
this problem will only get solved when we amass the
collective will to walk away from this system, and
create one that is more aligned with our values and
aspirations.
We ask that you assist us in
dissemination of the article published by
ICH to your social media accounts and post
links to the article from other websites.
Thank you for your support.
Peace and joy
The
views expressed in this article are solely those
of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
opinions of Information Clearing House.
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)