Is the Fed Preparing to Topple US Dollar?
By F. William Engdahl
September 03, 2019 "Information
Clearing House" - Unusual remarks and actions by the outgoing head of
the Bank of England and other central banking insiders strongly suggest that
there is a very ugly scenario in the works to end the role of the US dollar as
world reserve currency. In the process, this would involve that the Fed
deliberately triggers a dramatic economic depression. If this scenario is
actually deployed in coming months, Donald Trump will go down in history books
as the second Hebert Hoover, and the world economy will be pushed into the worst
collapse since the 1930s. Here are some elements worth considering.
Bank of England speech
The about-to-retire head of the very special Bank of England, Mark Carney,
delivered a remarkable speech at the recent annual meeting of central bankers
and finance elites at Jackson Hole Wyoming on August 23. The 23-page address to
fellow central bankers and financial insiders is clearly a major signal of where
the Powers That Be who run world central banks plan to take the world.
Carney addresses obvious flaws with the post-1944 dollar reserve system, noting
that, “…a destabilising asymmetry at the heart of the IMFS (International
Monetary and Financial System) is growing. While the world economy is being
reordered, the US dollar remains as important as when Bretton Woods collapsed.”
He states bluntly, “…In the longer term, we need to change the game…Risks are
building, and they are structural.” What he then goes on to outline is a
remarkably detailed blueprint for global central bank transformation of the
dollar order, a revolutionary shift.
Carney discusses the fact that China as the world leading trading nation is the
obvious candidate to replace the dollar as leading reserve, however, he notes,
“…for the Renminbi to become a truly global currency, much more is required.
Moreover, history teaches that the transition to a new global reserve currency
may not proceed smoothly.” He indicates that means it often needs wars or
depressions, as he cites the role of World War I forcing out sterling in favor
of the US dollar. What Carney finds more immediate is a new IMF-based monetary
system to replace the dominant role of the dollar. Carney declares, “While the
rise of the Renminbi may over time provide a second best solution to the current
problems with the IMFS, first best would be to build a multipolar system. The
main advantage of a multipolar IMFS is diversification… “ He adds, “… When
change comes, it shouldn’t be to swap one currency hegemon for another. Any
unipolar system is unsuited to a multi-polar world… In other words he says,
“Sorry, Beijing, you must wait.”
The Bank of England Governor proposes in effect that the IMF, with its
multi-currency Special Drawing Rights (SDR), a basket of five currencies—dollar,
Pound, Yen, Euro and now Renminbi—should play the central role creating a new
monetary system: “The IMF should play a central role in informing both domestic
and cross border policies. … Pooling resources at the IMF, and thereby
distributing the costs across all 189 member countries…” For that to work he
proposes raising the IMF SDR funds triple to $3 trillions as the core of a new
monetary system.
Then Carney proposes that the IMF oversee creation of a new payments
infrastructure based on an international “stablecoin.” Referring to the private
Libra, he clearly states a “new Synthetic Hegemonic Currency (SHC) would be best
provided by the public sector, perhaps through a network of central bank digital
currencies.” Note that Carney, a former Goldman Sachs banker, is mentioned as a
leading candidate to replace Christine Lagarde as IMF head. Is his speech open
admission of what is being planned by the world’s leading central bankers as the
next step to a world currency and global economic control? Let’s look further.
Lagarde to ECB
The Carney speech, when deciphered from its central bank language, gives us for
the first time a clear roadmap where the powers that control world central
banking would like to take us. The world reserve role of the US dollar must end;
it must be replaced by some form of IMF SDRs as basis for a multi-currency
reserve. That in turn would ultimately be based on digital money, so-called
block chain currencies. Such currencies, make no mistake, would be completely
controlled by central bank authorities and the IMF. That would require their
often-proposed elimination of all cash in favor of digital money where every
cent we spend can be monitored by the state. This cashless society would also
set the stage for the next great financial crisis and the confiscation by
governments of ordinary citizens’ bank deposits under new “bank bail-in” laws
now on the books since 2014 in every major industrial country including the EU
and USA.
The IMF is fully behind the turn to global blockchain digital currencies and use
of SDR to replace the dominant US dollar. In a little-noticed speech in November
14, 2018, IMF chief Lagarde strongly indicated that the IMF was behind central
bank digital currencies as well as cashless societies. She noted very carefully,
“I believe we should consider the possibility to issue digital currency. There
may be a role for the state to supply money to the digital economy.” She added,
“A new wind is blowing, that of digitalization…What role will remain for cash in
this digital world? … demand for cash is decreasing—as shown in recent IMF work.
And in ten, twenty, thirty years, who will still be exchanging pieces of paper?”
Dudley Remarks
The introduction of this central bankers’ new digital currency world will
require, as Carney suggests, dramatic upheavals of the status quo, upheavals
that would lead to the end of the dominant role of the US dollar since the 1944
Bretton Woods agreement. As that dollar reserve currency role is a pillar of
American power in the world, for that to happen would require nothing short of
catastrophe. Is this in fact what the Federal Reserve is quietly planning with
its money policies?
Are You Tired Of The Lies And Non-Stop Propaganda? |
A remarkable hint of what might be in the works came in an OpEd by the person
who until 2018 was the very important President of the New York Federal Reserve
Bank, Bill Dudley, who like Mark Carney is a senior Goldman Sachs alumnus.
Dudley is no minor actor in the central bankers’ world. Until last year he also
was a member of the Bank for International Settlements Board of Directors and
chaired the BIS Committee on Payment Settlement Systems and the Committee on the
Global Financial System.
Dudley, pointing to the Trump trade war policies and economic dangers of same,
then issues the following rare undiplomatic declaration: “Trump’s re-election
arguably presents a threat to the U.S. and global economy, to the Fed’s
independence and its ability to achieve its employment and inflation objectives.
If the goal of monetary policy is to achieve the best long-term economic
outcome, then Fed officials should consider how their decisions will affect the
political outcome in 2020.” While it shocked many, Dudley is merely making
public what the Fed has done since its creation in 1913 — influence the course
of world and US politics stealthily behind the cover of “neutral” monetary
policies. Dudley suggests not “Russian interference” but rather Fed
interference.
The Fed could easily tip the US into crisis. The debt levels of the US economy
are at record high levels for private households, Federal government, and US
corporate debt. Most US corporations have used growing debt, well over $9
trillion, to make stock buybacks rather than invest in new plant and equipment,
fueling an unprecedented bubble in the S&P stocks. The rising stocks are not a
sign of economic health but of a dangerous speculative bubble vulnerable to
collapse.
Were the Fed now to resume rate rises and continue its less-publicized
Quantitative Tightening into 2020, a domino-style series of debt defaults,
corporate bankruptcies, home mortgage foreclosures, default on car loans and
student loans could quickly make a second Trump Presidency in 2020 more than
doubtful. However that would be no grounds for the rest of the world opposed to
Trump policies to cheer. It would also trigger collapse in major emerging market
countries who have borrowed hundreds of billions denominated in US dollars,
including Chinese state companies, Turkey, Argentina, Brazil to name a few. EU
banks from Italy to Germany to France would fail.
If this Dudley scenario comes to pass in 2020 or not, only the key central bank
actors know for sure. It is clear that, after almost eleven years since the 2008
global financial meltdown, the unprecedented central bank zero interest rate
policies in the EU and until recently the US, have fueled creation of what some
call an “everything bubble”, not only in stocks, in corporate and public bonds,
in home prices. Is a new Fed intervention to raise rates and tighten credit the
event– the deliberate central bank rupturing of this inflated bubble using the
excuse of the Trump danger to the world economy– that Carney has in mind when he
says, “transition to a new global reserve currency may not proceed smoothly,”?
Let us hope not. The coming months will tell.
F. William Engdahl is strategic risk consultant and lecturer, he holds a degree in politics from Princeton University and is a best-selling author on oil and geopolitics, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook” http://www.williamengdahl.com/
Do you agree or disagree? Post your comment here
==See Also==
Note To ICH Community
We ask that you assist us in dissemination of the article published by ICH to your social media accounts and post links to the article from other websites.
Thank you for your support.
Peace and joy
Search Information Clearing House
|
===
Click Here To Support Information Clearing House Your support has kept ICH free on the Web since 2002. |
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Information Clearing House has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Information ClearingHouse endorsed or sponsored by the originator.) |