By Slavoj Zizek
August 02, 2019 "Information
Clearing House" -
Many
so-called Democrat ‘moderates’ would prefer Donald Trump to retain the US
Presidency than for Bernie Sanders, or another genuine leftist, to defeat him.
In this sense they are mirror-images of establishment Republicans, such as
George W Bush and Colin Powell, who publicly expressed support for Hillary
Clinton during the 2016 contest.
In the course of this week’s heated Democratic Party primary debate, former
Colorado governor John Hickenlooper warned that “you might as well FedEx the
election to Donald Trump” if the party adopts radical platforms. Such as Bernie
Sanders’ ‘Medicare for All’ plan, the Green New Deal and other game-changing
initiatives.
The ensuing passionate exchange clearly exposed the two camps in the Democratic
Party: the ‘moderates’ (representatives of the party establishment whose main
face is Joe Biden), and the more progressive democratic socialists (Bernie
Sanders, perhaps Elizabeth Warren, plus the four young congresswomen baptized by
Trump as the “Dem Squad”, and whose most popular face is now Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.)
This struggle is arguably the most important political battle taking place today
anywhere in the world.
It may appear that the moderates make a convincing case. After all, are
democratic socialists not simply too radical to win over the majority of voters?
Is the true struggle not the contest for undecided moderate voters who will
never endorse a Muslim, like Ilhan Omar who keeps her hair covered? And did
Trump himself not count on this when he brutally attacked the ‘Squad,’ thereby
obliging the entire Democratic party to show solidarity with the four girls,
elevating them to the status of party symbols?
For the Democratic Party centrists, the important thing is to get rid of Trump
and bring back the normal liberal-democratic hegemony which his election
disrupted.
Are You Tired Of The Lies And Non-Stop Propaganda? |
Deja Vu
Unfortunately, this strategy was already tested:
Hillary Clinton followed it, and a large
majority of the media thought she couldn’t lose
because Trump was unelectable. Even the two
Republican Presidents Bush, father and son,
endorsed her, but she lost and Trump won. His
victory undermined the establishment from the
Right.
Now isn’t it time for the Left to do the same?
Because, as with Trump three years ago, they
have a serious chance of winning.
Of course it’s this prospect which throws the
entire establishment into panic, even allowing
for Trump’s pseudo-alternative. Mainstream
economists predict the economic collapse of the
US in the case of a Sanders victory and
establishment political analysts fear the rise
of totalitarian state socialism. At the same
time, moderate Left liberals sympathize with the
goals of the democratic socialists but warn
that, unfortunately, they are out of touch with
reality. Yet, they are right to panic: something
entirely new is emerging in the US.
What is so refreshing about the leftist wing of
the Democratic Party is that they left behind
the stale waters of Political Correctness, as
recently seen in the ‘MeToo’ excesses. While
firmly standing with anti-racist and feminist
struggles, they focus on social issues like
universal healthcare and ecological threats,
etc.
Far from being crazy socialists who want to turn
the US into a new Venezuela, the left wing of
the Democratic Party has simply brought to the
US a taste of good old authentic European social
democracy.
Indeed, a quick look at their program makes it
abundantly clear that they pose no greater
threat to Western freedoms than Willy Brandt or
Olof Palme did.
All Changed
But what is even more important is that they are
not only the voice of the radicalized young
generation. Already their public faces –four
young women and an old white man– tell a
different story. Yes, they clearly demonstrate
that the majority of the younger generation in
the US is tired of the establishment in all its
versions. Also that they are skeptical about the
ability of capitalism as we know it to deal with
the problems we are facing, and that the word
socialism is for them no longer a taboo.
However, the true miracle is how many who have
joined forces with “old white men” like Sanders
represent the older generation of ordinary
workers, people who often tended to vote
Republican or even for Trump.
What is going on here is something that all the
partisans of Culture Wars and identity politics
considered impossible: anti-racists, feminists,
and ecologists joining forces with what was
considered the “moral majority” of ordinary
working people. Bernie Sanders, not the alt
Right, is the true voice of the moral majority,
if this term has any positive meaning.
So no, the eventual rise of the democratic
socialists will not guarantee Trump’s
re-election. It was Hickenlooper and other
moderates who were actually fedexing a message
to Trump from the debate. Their message was: “we
may be your enemies, but we all want Bernie
Sanders to lose. So don’t worry, if Bernie or
someone like him will be the Democratic Party
candidate, we will not stand behind him – we
secretly prefer you to win.”
Slavoj Zizek is a cultural philosopher. He’s a senior researcher at the Institute for Sociology and Philosophy at the University of Ljubljana and Global Distinguished Professor of German at New York University.
This article was originally published by "RT" - -
Do you agree or disagree? Post your comment here
==See Also==
Note To ICH Community
We ask that you assist us in dissemination of the article published by ICH to your social media accounts and post links to the article from other websites.
Thank you for your support.
Peace and joy
Search Information Clearing House
|
===
Click Here To Support Information Clearing House Your support has kept ICH free on the Web since 2002. |
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Information Clearing House has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Information ClearingHouse endorsed or sponsored by the originator.) |