By Soraya Sepahpour-Ulrich
June 30, 2019 "Information Clearing House" - Inarguably, Washington has a long history of supporting terrorists. As General William Odom, President Reagan’s former National Security Agency (NSA) Director wrote in his 2007 article “American Hegemony, How to Use It, How to Lose It”:“[T]errorism is not an enemy. It is a tactic. Because the United States itself has a long record of supporting terrorists and using terrorist tactics…”.Despite this long-standing use of tactic, there is no record of terrorists operating but a stone’s throw away from the White House. Nor has there been such brazen embrace of a terrorist group dubbed an undemocratic cult - until now.
The 1997 Patterns of Global Terrorism report issued by the State Department stated the following about the Mujahedin-e Khalq Organization (MEK or MKO, NCRI and various other acronyms):
During the 1970s, the MEK staged terrorist attacks inside Iran to destabilize and embarrass the Shah's regime; the group killed several US military personnel and civilians working on defense projects in Tehran. The group also supported the takeover in 1979 of the US Embassy in Tehran. In April 1992 the MEK carried out attacks on Iranian embassies in 13 different countries, demonstrating the group's ability to mount large-scale operations overseas.Listed as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) in 1997, the offices of the group’s spokesperson, Alireza Jafarzadeh was located at 1717 Pennsylvania Avenue. Even after the attacks of September 11 and America’s declared “war on terror”, the spokesperson and representative of the terror group was just down the street from the White House. Later, the organization would move its offices to 1747 Pennsylvania Avenue, remaining close to the residence of the President of the United States of America located at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
It is said that "familiarity breeds contempt." This is certainly not true of Washington officials and their cozy ties with the MEK cult. It seems that they are inching ever closer and have the audacity to flaunt their ties. Washington’s actions are a long cry from Israel’s who in the 1990’s was secretly aiding the group. (The Israeli-MEK relations continue to be omitted from news headlines while the accusatory finger is pointed to Saudi Arabia for their financial support of the cult).
Are You Tired Of The Lies And Non-Stop Propaganda? |
Connie Brock of The New Yorker
writes: “Israel had a
relationship with the M.E.K at
least since the late nineties,
and had supplied a satellite
signal for N.C.R.I. broadcasts
from Paris into Iran. An Israeli
diplomat said: "The M.E.K is
useful," but did not elaborate.
According to the same report,
the Israelis provided the MEK
with unsubstantiated
"intelligence" on Iran’s nuclear
program. Not surprising since
the aforementioned 1997
Patterns of Global Terrorism
report states, “The MEK directs
a worldwide campaign against the
Iranian Government that stresses
propaganda and occasionally uses
terrorist violence.”
The close relationship with
Israel may help explain why it
was that in spite of being
listed as terrorists, the group
managed to bribe prominent
politicians; even as a provision
of the
defense authorization bill
would grant the military the
authority to detain and hold
anyone indefinitely, or to
assassinate any individual
suspected of having ties to
terrorists/al Qaeda. Yet, these
terrorists were giving speaking
fees to American politicians.
(The group also has its
tentacles around British
politicians – see
HERE).
What is even more mind-boggling
is the fact that Israel was
supporting a terrorist cult that
had
massacred the Kurds in Iraq
in 1991, and only a few year
later, the Israelis were
training the
Kurds in Iraq who has
survived the massacre (obviously
something that has been lost on
the Kurds) while their killers,
the MEK, were
being chauffeured around by
American soldiers a short
distance away in Iraq - in
America’s "war on terror!"
Meanwhile, back home,
politicians were being bribed by
the terrorists! Clearly, FATF
(Financial Action Task Force)
did not prevent money from being
funneled to and from terrorists.
Shamelessly, Washington is
demanding that Iran become a
member of FATF to stop terrorism
financing!
Even while the terrorist group
was doling out money to corrupt
politicians so they could be
removed from the FTO list, and
Washington politicians accepted
money from terrorists, the group
continued with its terrorism and
carried out cross-border raids
inside Iran with the full
knowledge and encouragement of
the Bush administration (History
Commons).
Concurrently, Washington was
using other group members to
promote propaganda against Iran
with emphasis on "human rights."
The leader of the terrorist
cult, Maryam Rajavi’s
live satellite broadcast
into Washington was cheered .
This certainly gave new meaning
to "human rights" promotion by
America – as well as its "war on
terror."
The hypocrisy reached across the
aisle. Democrats and Republicans
don’t agree on much, but both
parties supported this terrorist
cult – all the way to the top.
When Hillary Clinton was running
for President in 2008,
Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee
(D -Texas), co-chair of
Hillary’s presidential campaign,
not only shared her friendship
with America’s then presidential
hopeful, but
she also promoted America’s
pet terrorists – the MEK.
Congresswoman Jackson Lee went
as far as calling Maryam Rajavi
“Sister Maryam." (Would this
make Hillary and Maryam
"sisters" too?).
Certainly, Hillary’s push
to remove the MEK from the FTO was a
very sisterly act.
It is important to bear in mind that the
group was removed from the list of FTO after
US officials disclosed to NBC that the
MEK terrorist group was financed, trained
and armed by Israel’s secret service and
responsible for the killing of Iran’s
nuclear scientists; and at a time when the
United States was negotiating the Joint
Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), also
known as the Iran Deal.
This year, as the Iranians mark the
38th anniversary of a horrendous attack
by the MEK cult, the Trump administration is
openly promoting the cult and flaunts
Washington’s decades long, bipartisan
infatuation with a notorious,
anti-democratic cult. What makes the MEK
stand out?
Israel’s support aside, they seem to be
brought out in the open whenever Washington
wants to play tis psychological games with
Iran – its "stick," the term [offensive]
policy makers like to use. Washington knows
full well that the group is hated in Iran.
That not a single member of this group will
be tolerated in Iran, and there is no future
for the group. History also shows that
Washington has experienced blow-back every
time it has supported an unsavory group or
when it has encouraged terror and
terrorists. Terrorism, like pollution, does
not recognize borders. Why the mad romancing
of the MEK?
Perhaps Washington hopes that this cult will
simply come to an end. As the
Council on Foreign Relations has
reported: “Many analysts, including Rubin,
have characterized the
MEK as a cult, citing the group’s fealty
to the Rajavis. Older women were reportedly
required to divorce their husbands in the
late 1980s, and younger girls cannot marry
or have children.”. Perhaps Washington’s
thinking is that their numbers will dwindle
and there will be no future generations of
this cult to come back and haunt it. Now
there is a wish both Washington and Tehran
share!
But wishes don’t make policies. Washington
needs to understand that its stick is a
boomerang that will come back at it.
Washington has become morally and fiscally
bankrupt as a result of its wrong policies.
Its high time to save itself from the
quagmire of its own creation before sinking
beyond redemption.
Soraya Sepahpour-Ulrich is an independent researcher and writer with a focus on U.S. foreign policy
Do you agree or disagree? Post your comment here
==See Also==
Note To ICH Community
We ask that you assist us in dissemination of the article published by ICH to your social media accounts and post links to the article from other websites.
Thank you for your support.
Peace and joy
Search Information Clearing House
|
===
Click Here To Support Information Clearing House Your support has kept ICH free on the Web since 2002. |
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Information Clearing House has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Information ClearingHouse endorsed or sponsored by the originator.) |