By James George Jatras
April 15, 2019 "Information
Clearing House" -
On March 6, 2016, this Deplorable
issued a
statement formally endorsing Donald J. Trump
for the presidency of the United State.
I now hereby withdraw that endorsement.
No doubt this declaration from
your Working Boy will be greeted with
the same deafening indifference as my
earlier less than earth-shattering
announcement of support.
Keep calm. The planet will continue to spin
on its axis at a 23.44 degree tilt.
As I tweeted on April 4, when it
appeared that Ecuadorian President Lenín
[sic] Moreno was going to cough up Julian
Assange:
“If this comes to pass & #JulianAssange is brought to #US in chains like a Gaulish chieftain in a Roman triumph can we definitively declare that any possible #Trump revolution is over & the #DeepState won?”A quick perusal of social media since Assange’s arrest shows that many others have reached a similar conclusion.
But why? To be sure, there have been other betrayals. The two strikes on Syria on phony chemical warfare accusations come immediately to mind. Or Trump’s failure to build the Mexican wall, coupled with repeated humiliating defeats in Congress with the predictability of Charlie Brown’s getting suckered by Lucy into trying to kick the football.
|
Tired Of The Lies And Non-Stop Propaganda? |
At the same time there were excuses.
On Syria, maybe the President was fed
false intelligence.
Or maybe Ivanka was upset: Daaaddyyy,
you have to dooo something! Or maybe
Trump knew the CW accusations against
Damascus were fake but felt he had to
act (an ominous sign in itself) to
deflect charges of being Putin’s puppet,
hence what could be deemed deliberately
pinprick pro forma strikes. On the wall,
well you can’t trust lawyers’ advice, he
just doesn’t understand his legal
authority well enough, or maybe he…
But the Assange arrest and his upcoming
renditi- – oops! – extradition to
the United States are different. There’s
no nuance. No excuse. No false intel
report. No poor legal advice.
It’s plain and simple. The same entities
(Deep State, permanent government, the
oligarchy, the Borg, whatever term you
like) that targeted Trump with the phony
Russia collusion narrative want
Assange’s scalp nailed to the wall. It’s
one thing for favored outlets like the
Washington Post and CNN to disseminate
classified information that favors the
Deep State, quite another to reveal
information contrary to its interests.
As the premier dispenser of embarrassing
secrets that facilitates online
dissidence from the established
narrative (also under attack
by governments and their tech giant
accomplices) an example must be made
of Assange
pour encourager les autres. He can
count on being sentenced to rotting for
decades in a
nasty Office Space federal prison
(the US will gladly waive the death
penalty to spare the Brits’ prissy
Euro-consciences) but may very well die
soon enough of natural causes,
perhaps like Slobodan Milošević.
An essential role in Assange’s betrayal
by Moreno was played by
Trump’s Veep Mike Pence and
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.
Former President Rafael Correa says a
direct condition of Moreno’s getting a
$4.2 billion IMF loan was Assange’s head
on a platter. That’s a lot more
plausible than establishment media
reports that
Assange was ejected for transgressing
the
Ecuadorians’ fastidious hygiene
standards, which (whether based in
fact or not) are just cynical
defamations to justify his upcoming
lynching.
It’s irrelevant whether Trump – who
theoretically is the boss of all US
agency operatives working with their
Brit colleagues to get their mitts on
Assange – let the nab go forward because
he was unwilling to order his minions to
stand down or was powerless to do so. In
that regard, it’s similar to pointlessly
asking why he has the
terrible, horrible, no good, very bad
national security team he does. Is
it because of “Javanka”?
Is it because he’s
beholden to a gaggle of oligarchs?
(Supposedly his being a self-financed
billionaire made him immune from such
influences.) Is it areflection
of a personality disorder?
In the end it doesn’t matter why, all
that matters is what is. With Assange’s
arrest Trump is now exposed as the
wholly owned subsidiary of the Swamp he
ran against. He’s now just a wheel fixed
to an axle. All he can do now is it
spin.
In my 2016 endorsement I asked the
questions – only questions, not
predictions – of what Trump might
hopefully accomplish:
‘Can we trust Trump? Will he build his wall and secure our borders? Renovate our deteriorating infrastructure? Restore our manufacturing base? Audit the Federal Reserve and defenestrate the banksters? Restore the GOP’s long-lost reputation (now hardly remembered by anyone) as the “Peace Party” that got us out of wars the Democrats started? Sign a bill to defund Planned Parenthood, as long as they continue to perform abortions (which they will)? Exclude actual or potential Islamic terrorists? Dump our freeloading so-called “allies”? Cease the PC trashing of every tradition in which Americans once took pride? Reunite a nation sundered by Barack Obama and the GOP mandarins, with their divide et impera Punch and Judy show of class and racial discord?Even in retrospect it was then a gamble worth taking, indeed the only responsible choice given the horrifying alternative. More, given what Trump promised that departed from the usual nonsense served up by the GOP, the fact that Trump got the nomination instead of the NPCs on the shelf was itself perhaps a sign of that the historic American nation still had a fighting chance.
‘Can Trump really “Make America Great Again”? Or at least slow our decline and give our country another chance?
‘I don’t know. But I do know that none of the more mannerly politicians served up by the oligarchy will.
‘“Trust not in princes...” (Ps. 146:3) Neither Trump nor any other politician should be accepted on blind faith. Who really can say if Trump can win or if he does how he would govern. Who can say what’s really in his mind and heart or if, in God’s eyes, he’s a good man or a bad one. But given the dire warning from the likes of Mitt Romney, I like the odds with Trump better than with any of the available alternatives. When the character of his enemies is considered – particularly Warfare State neoconservatives (some of whom at least have the honesty to defect openly to Hillary) – my willingness to gamble on him only increases.’
As for what we hoped he might deliver to “Make America Great Again,” we can see now that the answers to all of the above questions are and will remain an emphatic No. Sure, we got a marginally better tax bill passed, something that any Republican White House and Congress would have done. He may have made minor progress on trade. If we are really lucky, he’ll get another Supreme Court pick and Roe v. Wade will be overturned – marvelous to be sure, but it won’t same this country.
Trump has utterly failed to control the border, much less deal with related issues like remittances, birthright citizenship, and aliens illegally voting. As retired Army Colonel Douglas Macgregor observes: “Surely, Trump should have concluded by now that without an Executive Order that commits the US Army to the defense of the southern border and limits cross-border traffic to legitimate commercial activity, mass illegal immigration will not stop… In a word, Trump refuses to take command and match rhetoric with action, then he will join the pantheon of failed presidents that promised the world only, this time, the American Republic’s existence hangs in the balance.”
Unfortunately, Trump’s appointees – uniformly neoconservatives, Bush-era warmongers, and GOP apparatchiki – have better things for our military to do than defending our own country, to which they are at best indifferent. We can be thankful that Trump hasn’t started any new wars, yet, but his underlings’ dogged commitment to regime change in Venezuela and Iran may change that. His outreach to North Korea hangs by a thread in the face of blatant attempts to sabotage it.
One hopes that at least some animal-level gut instinct will preclude Trump’s crossing that dark river and ruining what’s left of his presidency as George W. Bush did in Iraq. If his lunatics are reckless enough to stumble us into a war with Russia, Trump’s reelection will be the least of anyone’s concerns.
Even without a war his remaining time in office will not be the revival of America that he promised. Let’s keep in mind that for many decades now transformative Democratic presidents have not left this country the same way they found it: FDR, LBJ, Clinton, Obama. By contrast, Republican presidents’ tenures have been at best plateaus along our decline (Eisenhower, Reagan) or positively contributed (Nixon, the two Bushes) to the march of what the Left regards as “Progress” toward their abolition of the historic America and birth of a dystopian Cultural Marxist dictatorship of victims: a borderless, multiethnic, multilingual, multireligious, multisexual, ahistorical, fake country.
Perhaps the saddest thing is that even if he survives in office until the 2020 vote (and he might not) Trump still will almost certainly be the lesser of two evils, in the manner to which we have become accustomed. Despite his no longer representing a threat to the Swamp, the critters will continue to hate him anyway as an avatar of the America they seek to destroy: European ethnicity, Christian (culturally if not spiritually or morally), English-speaking, toxically masculine. He might even win, given the Wall Street and Democratic Socialist Democrats’ ripping each others’ guts out and the solid 35 to 40 percent of the folks who think from Trump’s tweets and stump speeches he’s actually delivering on his promises.
Either way, though, the outcome will be the same. The man who had what is almost certainly to have been the last peaceful, political chance save what’s left of the American republic will thrash around for a few more years, having become little more than a catalyst for our nation’s demise and perhaps its dissolution.
This is not to say that there is no hope. Maybe tomorrow Trump will pardon Assange. Maybe he’ll decide to militarize the Mexican border. Maybe he’ll fire his whole national security team and, for good measure, pull us out of Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq – and NATO. Maybe Barr really will hold the FISA miscreants to account. Maybe…
…maybe there will be an outpouring of miracles that match the one that occurred when Trump improbably was elected in the first place. But as is the case with miracles, the odds are not good.
This article was originally published by "Strategic Culture Foundation " -
Do you agree or disagree? Post your comment here
==See Also==
Tulsi Defends Assange Powerfully On CNN
Note To ICH Community
We ask that you assist us in dissemination of the article published by ICH to your social media accounts and post links to the article from other websites.
Thank you for your support.
Peace and joy
