October
01, 2018 "Information
Clearing House"-
In my September 24 column, “Truth Is Evaporating
Before Our Eyes,”
https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2018/09/24/truth-is-evaporating-before-our-eyes/
I used the destruction of the CBS news team that
broke the Abu Ghraib story and the story of
President George W. Bush’s non-performance of
his Texas Air Force National Guard duties to
demonstrate how accusations alone could destroy
a Peabody Award winning, 26 year veteran
producer of CBS News, Mary Mapes, and the
established news anchor Dan Rather.
I have
many times written that it was President Bill
Clinton who destroyed the independent US media
when he permitted 90 percent of the US media to
be concentrated in six mega-corporations that
were in the entertainment and other businesses
and not in the news business. This unprecedented
concentration of media was against all American
tradition and destroyed the reliance that our
Founding Fathers placed on a free press to keep
government accountable to the people.
Until I
read Mary Mapes book, Truth and Duty
(St. Martin’s Press, 2005), I was unaware of how
this monopolization of the media in violation of
the Sherman Anti-trust Act and American
tradition had proceeded to destroy honest
reporting.
Here is
what happened. The Texas Air National Guard was
a place the elite placed their sons to avoid the
Vietnam War draft. Copies of documents written
by Lt. Col. Jerry B. Killian describing George
W. Bush’s ability to jump the large waiting list
hoping to avoid the war, Bush’s non-compliance
with National Guard requirements and Bush’s
unauthorized departure to another state were
given to CBS. The CBS team worked for many
months to confirm or discredit the documents.
The information in the documents proved to be
consistent with the interviews of people
acquainted with George W. Bush’s time in the
Texas National Guard.
It was
a carefully prepared story, not a rushed one,
and it fits all the information we now have of
Bush’s non-performance.
The
problem for the CBS news team, which might not
have been realized at the time, was that the
documents were copies, not originals that
experts could authenicate as real beyond
question. Therefore, although the documents were
consistent with the testimony of others, no
expert could validate the documents as they
could originals.
The
Republicans seized on this chink in the armor to
turn the issue away from the truthfulness of the
CBS 60 Minutes report to whether or not the
copies were fakes.
CBS had
two other problems. One was that Viacom, its
owner, was not in the news business, but in the
lobbying business in Washington wanting to
enrich the company with legislative perks and
regulatory permissions. Truthful news from CBS,
exposing US torture in the face of the Bush
regime’s denials and showing that Bush was too
privileged to be held accountable by the Texas
National Guard, was damaging Viacom’s highly
paid lobbying effort.
When
the right-wing bloggers took after CBS, the
Viacom executives saw how to get rid of the
troublesome CBS news team. Viacom executives
refused to support their reporters and convened
a kangeroo count consisting of Republicans to
“investigate” the 60 Minutes story of Bush’s
failure to comply with his obligations to the
Texas National Guard.
Viacom
wanted to get rid of the independent news
constraint on its lobbying success, but Mary
Mapes and her lawyers thought truth meant
something and would prevail. Therefore, she
subjected herself to the destructive process of
watching the orchestrated destruction of her
career and her integrity.
CBS’
other problem was that, with or without
justification, CBS and Dan Rather were regarded
in conservative Republican circles as liberal, a
designation equivalent to a communist. For
millions of Americans the controversy was about
liberal CBS trying to harm George W. Bush and
leave us exposed to Muslim Terrorism. In
right-wing minds, Bush was trying to protect
America from Muslim terrorists who blew up the
World Trade Center and the Pentagon, and CBS was
trying to smear President Bush.
Mary
Mapes, Dan Rather, and the CBS news team were
too focused on news to take into account the
dangerous situation in which they were
operating. Therefore, they walked into a trap
that served Dick Cheney’s Middle Eastern wars,
which served Halliburton and Israel, and into a
trap that served conservative hatred of
“liberal” news.
Why
didn’t the American media defend CBS’ careful
reporting? The answer is that this was a time
when TV news media was dying. The Internet was
taking over. The rest of the media saw in the
demise of CBS a chance to gain that market and
have a longer life.
So the
rest of the media took up the fake news that 60
Minutes had presented a report based on fake
documents. The media did not realize that they
were signing their own death warrants. Neither
did the right-wing bloggers that the Republicans
had sicced on CBS. Today, these bloggers are
themselves shut off from being able to express
any truth.
Truth
in America is being exterminated, and the
destruction of CBS news was the starting point.
As Mary Mapes reports in her book, as soon as
Viacom was entirely rid of 60 Minutes with the
firing of the entire staff, on the very next day
Viacom held a triumphant annual investor
meeting. Chairman Sumner Redstone was awarded a
a $56 million paycheck for 2004. Chief operating
officers, Les Moonves and Tom Freston “each
pocketed a whoopping fifty-two million for the
year.”
And the
CBS news team went without mortgage, car, or
health insurance payments.
Mapes
writes: “Just a few years ago, this kind of
corporate executive largesse was unheard of.
Now, these media Masters of the Universe have
taken over the public airwaves and they have one
obligation: making a profit.” Ever a larger one,
which requires protecting the government and the
corporate advertisers from investigative
reporting.
The
consequence today is that the American media is
totally unreliable. No reader can rely on any
report, not even on a New York Times obituary.
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)