Veterans’ Group Says “No” to Emmy for
PBS Vietnam War Series
By Mike Ferner
May 31, 2018 "Information
Clearing House"
-
A national veterans’ organization is
weighing in on this year’s Emmy awards
with
a full-page ad in
Variety, saying
Ken Burns and Lynne Novick’s “Vietnam
War” series does not deserve a “Best
Documentary” award.
Veterans For Peace
(VFP), headquartered in St. Louis, with
175 chapters in the U.S. and six
overseas, will run the Variety ad prior
to the awards on September 17, to
generate discussion about the series and
the lasting impact it will have if
“crowned with an Emmy.”
The ad says that because “The Emmy Award
is a powerful recognition of truth in
art,” Emmy judges are asked to consider
whether, “In this war-torn world, what
is desperately needed – but what Burns
and Novick fail to convey – is an honest
rendering of that war to help the
American people avoid yet more
catastrophic wars.”
The ad (attached)
identifies what it considers the
fundamental flaw of the PBS series:
Burns and Novick “assert at the
beginning that the war ‘was begun in
good faith by decent people, out of
fateful misunderstandings.’” Questioned
about this in a
New York Times interview
, Burns admitted that might have been
“too generous to our leaders,” but he
stuck by it.
VFP’s ad quickly responds to that
“generous” remark, saying, “Even a
cursory reading of the Pentagon Papers
disclosed by Daniel Ellsberg,”
(inexplicably missing from this history)
“demonstrates the falseness of this
claim of American innocence.” The
painful truth, according to the ad, is
that the United States “rained
incredible violence on the Vietnamese
people merely to replace France as the
dominant power in Southeast Asia.”
Acknowledging that Burns and Novick were
“justifiably critical of American
presidents and military leaders” the
veterans say the filmmakers, “mainly
focus on the harm to U.S. soldiers” and
“reinvigorate Cold War myths that the
Vietnamese anti-colonial struggle was
merely an extension of Soviet and
Chinese communist expansion.”
Another shortcoming in last fall’s
series was it paid far too little
attention to the millions of civilian
deaths the U.S. caused in Southeast
Asia, skips over the millions of people
still suffering from the effects of
Agent Orange and ignores some 700,000
tons of unexploded ordnance still
lurking in the fields of Vietnam, Laos
and Cambodia, still killing and injuring
today.
Many VFP members have first-hand
knowledge of the broad anti-war
movement, some as participants in the
active-duty G.I. resistance where they
conducted peaceful protests, sabotage
and outright mutiny, and some in the
civilian peace movement after their
military service. Nowhere in 18 hours
of programming does the G.I. resistance
movement merit mention and “instead of
honoring the civilian peace movement for
its accomplishments, activists are
generally belittled as self-interested
and self-indulgent, with stress on its
supposed deep antagonism toward American
soldiers,” the ad protests.
VFP concludes its ad, just above an
iconic photograph of protesting G.I.s
holding a banner emblazoned with, “We
won’t fight another rich man’s war,” by
saying that if the Burns/Novick series
is “crowned with an Emmy, this defective
history of the Vietnam era will become
required viewing for generations of
young Americans—a seductive, but false,
interpretation of events.”
VFP is accepting donations to help pay
for the ad
at this link
.
-end-
Ferner is a former president of Veterans
For Peace and author of “Inside the Red
Zone: A Veteran For Peace Reports from
Iraq.”
mike.ferner@sbcglobal.net
Are You Tired Of
The Lies And
Non-Stop Propaganda?
|
The views expressed in this article are
solely those of the author and do not
necessarily reflect the opinions of
Information Clearing House.
======
Join the Discussion
It is not necessary for ICH
readers to register before placing a
comment. We ask that you treat others
with respect. Take a moment to read the
following -
Comment Policy
-
What Or Who is Information
Clearing House
and
Purpose and Intent of this website:
It is unacceptable to slander, smear or engage in personal attacks on authors of articles posted on ICH. Those engaging in that behavior will be banned from the comment section.