The
Shooting At Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School
In Parkland Florida
By Paul
Craig Roberts
February 27, 2018 "Information
Clearing House"
- Readers
have inquired about my silence about the Florida
shooting on Valentine’s Day. The answer is that
school shootings are not my expertise. Moreover,
a country, such as the US, which no longer has
an independent TV and print national media, is
unable to find out and is dependent on the story
told by authorities. Although it is probably
impossible to find out what happened,
independent Internet media makes it possible for
a person willing to invest the time and effort,
to arrive at a conclusion on their own. Here are
some of the things to think about.
A Parkland
FL Stoneman Douglas high school teacher says the
school had been told there would be a code red
drill. When he heard shooting, he assumed it was
the drill.
A
woman, Debbie, provides videos of reporters
interviewing students who say they were told
there would be a drill with police firing blanks
with people screaming, the purpose of which was
to prepare the students in the event a real
shooting occurred.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/hCp33awMjsq9/
At about the 28 minute mark in the video
Parkland FL high school students tell news
reporters interviewing them that they were told
there would be a realistic drill at the school
that would simulate a real attack.
I do
not know anything about Debbie. It is important
to note that it is not Debbie who is making the
claims. The interviews with the students are
interviews broadcast by news organizations.
Debbie’s video could have been better organized,
much shorter, and less confusing. Instead of
preparing a concise report beforehand, she
prepares her report as you watch. At the 55
minute mark Debbie becomes emotional over the
gullibility of the public and the inability of
Americans to see the inconsistencies between the
official timeline and news reports and the
inconsistencies between the evidence the media
presents and the media’s explanation of the
evidence.
There
is no doubt about the inconsistencies. Whether
this is just sloppy reporting or simply
reporters reading the official story off of
pre-prepared press releases I do not know.
There
is no doubt that the video interviews with
school teacher and students who say they had
been told there would be a code red drill are
real. What I find disturbing is that there does
not seem to be mention of the drill in the
official story. Remember the Boston Marathon
Bombing. That day the Boston newspaper had
announced that there would be a bombing drill at
the end of the race, and in videos of the event
an announcement of a drill is made at the scene
just prior to the explosion, which the
announcement says will not be a real bomb.
Other
puzzling features of the Parkland FL shooting
are (1) one student says she was walking out of
the building with the suspect while shooting was
going on elsewhere in the building, which leads
her to the conclusion that there were two
shooters. Another student says there were three
shooters. (2) Students report that police were
in the building while shooting was underway. (3)
Apparently there is no news interview with the
Uber driver who delivered the shooter to the
school. (4)
The timeline which allows only a
few minutes for the shooting is not sufficient time
for the suspect to have put on his bulletproof
vest, helmet, gasmask, go up a stairwell and
shoot up 3 different floors.
What I
have to say about this is the same as what I
have said about other events. Instead of
clearing up the inconsistencies and
acknowledging that a drill had been announced,
the media dismisses those who ask the obvious
questions as conspiracy kooks. In place of
rational explanations we get name-calling. Why?
What is
so difficult about the authorities and the media
explaining either that the teacher and students
misunderstood and are mistaken that a drill had
been announced, or, alternatively, explaining
why there are several instances of an actual
event occurring simultaneously with an announced
drill? A person would think that the print and
TV media would find a very interesting subject
in real events occurring simultaneously with
drills of the events, including apparently 9/11
itself, and how facts are known in advance of
the actual event.
Instead, once again we get a pre-prepared story.
In this one, timeline problems are reminiscent
of the BBC reporter standing in front of a still
standing World Trade Center Building 7 on
September 11, 2001, announcing that the
unexpected collapse of the building had occurred
20 or 30 minutes before the event.
Architects, engineers, and physicists have
conclusively proven that WTC 7 was brought down
by controlled demolition and that the twin
towers did not collapse because of airplanes and
fire.
Almost
all, if not all, of the carnage events have more
unanswered than answered questions. You should
ask yourself why the questions remain unanswered
if the official stories are true.
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
