Amnesty
International Is Barking Up The Wrong Tree
By Paul
Craig Roberts
January
15, 2017 "Information
Clearing House"
- I have received a letter from Margaret Huang,
Amnesty International’s executive director. She
is fundraising on the basis of President Trump’s
“chilling disregard for our cherished human
rights” and his exploitation of “hatred,
misogyny, racism and zenophobia,” by which he
has “emboldened and empowered the most violent
segments of our society.”
Considering the hostility of Identity Politics
toward Trump, one can understand why Ms. Huang
frames her fundraiser in this way, but are the
Trump deplorables the most empowered and violent
segments of our society or is it the security
agencies, the police, the neoconservatives, the
presstitute media, and the Republican and
Democratic parties?
John
Kiriakou, Ray McGovern, Philip Giraldi, Edward
Snowden, and others inform us that it is their
former employers, the security agencies, that
are empowered by unaccountability and violent by
intent. Certainly the security agencies are
emboldened by everything they have gotten away
with, including their conspiracy to destroy
President Trump with their orchestration known
as Russiagate.
The
violence that the US government has committed
against humanity since the Clinton regime
attacked Serbia was not committed by Trump
deplorables. The violence that has destroyed in
whole or part eight countries, murdering,
maiming, and displacing millions of peoples, was
committed by the Clinton, George W. Bush, and
Obama regimes, their secretaries of state such
as Hillary Clinton, their national security
advisers, their military and security
establishments, both parties in Congress. The
murder of entire countries was endorsed by the
presstitute media and the heads of state of
Washington’s European, Canadian, Australian, and
Japanese vassals. Trump and his deplorables have
a long way to go to match this record of
violence.
Whether
she understands it or not, Ms. Huang with her
letter is shifting the violence from where it
belongs to where it does not. The consequence
will be to increase violence and human rights
violations.
The
most dangerous source of violence that we face
is nuclear Armageddon resulting from the
neoconservative quest for US hegemony. Since the
Clinton regime every US government has broken
tension-easing agreements that previous
administrations had achieved with Moscow. During
the Obama regime the gratuitous aggressions and
false accusations against Russia became extreme.
Why
doesn’t Amnesty International address the
reckless and irresponsible acts of the US
government that are violating the rights of
people in numerous countries and pushing the
world into nuclear war? Instead, there have been
times when Amnesty International aligns with
Washington’s propaganda against Washington’s
victims.
By
jumping on the military/security complex’s get
Trump movement, human rights and environmental
organizations have increased the likelihood that
rights and environment will be lost to war.
There
can be no doubt that Trump is undoing past
environmental protections and opening the
environment and wildlife to more destruction.
However, the worst destruction comes from war,
especially nuclear war.
Would
things be different if the
liberal/progressive/left had rallied to Trump’s
support in reducing tensions with Russia, in
normalizing the hostile relations that Obama had
established with Moscow? Would the support of
the liberal/progressive/left have helped Trump
resist the pressures from the neoconservative
warmongers? In exchange for support for his
principal goal, would Trump have mitigated
industry’s attacks on the environment and vetoed
the renewal of the Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Act that violates human rights?
We will
never know, because the liberal/progressive/left
could not see beyond the end ot its nose to
comprehend what it means for the environment and
for human rights for nuclear powers to be locked
into mutual suspicion.
Thanks
to the failure of the liberal/progressive/left
and to the presstitute media to understand the
stakes, the military/security complex has been
successful in pushing Trump off his agenda. The
damage that a mining company and offshore
drilling can do to the environment is large, but
it pales in comparison to the damage from
nuclear weapons.
Dr.
Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of
the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate
editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was
columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News
Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many
university appointments. His internet columns
have attracted a worldwide following. Roberts'
latest books are
The Failure of Laissez Faire
Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West,
How America Was Lost,
and
The Neoconservative Threat to
World Order.
The
views expressed in this article are solely those
of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
opinions of Information Clearing House.