Hassan Nasrallah: The US Keep
Supporting ISIS In every Way Possible
Video and Transcript
Speech by Hezbollah Secretary General Sayed Hassan Nasrallah on November 20,
2017, following the victory of Abu Kamal and one day after the meeting of the
Arab League which again designated Hezbollah as a terrorist organization
[...] When we get to the point where
Iraqi leaders will announce their final
victory against ISIS and Syrian leaders
will announce the final victory against
ISIS, we will have to sit and talk, we
will need to make calls, organize
conferences and studies...
Of course, we will also need real
festivities to celebrate the victory
because it will be a great victory, a
victory against the organization
representing the greatest danger (for
all) that soiled more than anyone the
religion of Muhammad b. Abdillah, peace
and blessings be upon him and his
family, since 1,400 years. This will be
the victory of humanistic and moral
values against horrific bestiality,
cruelty and violence. A victory that
will have a huge impact on the cultural,
religious, humanitarian, military,
security, political levels, as well as
on the very image (of Islam and Muslims)
and at all levels.
And at that moment, we will have to
repeat that the Iraqi people, the Syrian
people, the Lebanese people, all the
elites and all the leaders and peoples
of the region should reflect, weigh and
return to the question of the identity
of the creators, supporters, advocates
and promoters of ISIS, that enabled them
to commit these terrorist massacres [US,
UK, France, Saudi Arabia, Turkey,
Qatar...], and the identity of those who
have stood against ISIS, fought them,
offered martyrs in this fight [Iran,
Syria, Irak, Hezbollah, Russia] and
inflicted a defeat on ISIS and all those
who stand behind them. This is a
discussion to be held with depth and
strength so that the (Muslim) believers
do not become victims twice of the same
ills.
Returning to the victory of Abu Kamal
[last important ISIS bastion in Syria,
retaken by Syrian, Iran, Hezbollah and
Russian forces]. What did the Americans
do? As this will also be useful in the
discussions that will take place then.
In the battle of Abu Kamal, Americans
did everything they could to help ISIS,
except for one thing: open fire directly
on the allied forces who worked for the
liberation of Abu Kamal. It's the only
thing they have not done, they did not
open fire on us. The US Air Force did
not hit the Syrian and allied forces
liberating ISIS – sorry, liberating Abu
Kamal from ISIS. Let's see some examples
of what they did.
First, they provided air cover to ISIS
throughout the whole region east of the
Euphrates River, between the river and
the Iraqi border. In this region, ISIS
moved freely and openly with its
strengths, tanks, heavy weapons,
missiles, front lines, everything was
secured by the Americans. The US Air
Force has never struck them, while they
claim to be at the head of an
international alliance to fight ISIS,
and they prevented the Russian and
Syrian aircraft from approaching the
area. And they threatened that in case
of Russian or Syrian strikes East of the
Euphrates, they would strike West of the
Euphrates and therefore hit the allied
forces attacking Abu Kamal. That is the
first point: US coverage and
comprehensive aerial protection for ISIS
East of the Euphrates, and thus their
front lines during our attack and when
they retreated.
Second, the Americans sent their drones
over the Allied forces that liberated
Abu Kamal and provided – these are not
frivolous charges, but clear data and
highly sensitive information – ISIS with
accurate information which then allowed
them to hit the targets identified by
the US drones.
Third, they conducted an intense
electronic warfare that worked to blur
all electronic devices used by offensive
forces.
(Fourth), when finally ISIS was defeated
in Abu Kamal, they did everything they
could to help ISIS to withdraw, to
protect them and save their lives. It's
always the same story, it's not worth
repeating. All they could do to
facilitate and protect the retreat of
ISIS, its officers and capacities from
Abu Kamal to the East of the river, the
Americans did. And ISIS was also
welcomed and advised in areas controlled
by the Kurds, the so-called Syrian
democratic forces.
Sidebar: we will have to – it is a
legitimate hypothesis – expect in the
more or less far future that ISIS
residues are reformed and become
battalions of the “Syrian democratic
Forces” directed, supported and now led
by US forces in Syria.
And finally, during the battle and after
it, US helicopters landed in the ISIS
regions and extracted leaders, people
(among the ranks of ISIS to save them).
We should wonder about their role, their
actions, the orders they received from
Americans with ISIS. And it happened in
many places and many times, especially
in Deir Ezzor and in Iraq. This is what
the Americans did.
And their real concern was that ISIS
resists at Abu Kamal until the end, and
that this offensive from Syrian and
allied forces against Abu Kamal fails.
And this is further evidence of the
extent of US interference, of their
support and protection for ISIS as long
as possible.
We should remember that the Americans
said that eliminating ISIS will require
30 years according to some, 25 years
according to others, and 10 years for
the most optimistic, but the Resistance
Axis in the region managed to inflict a
(near-final) defeat to ISIS in just a
few years. This is a humiliation for
American leaders and US policy. And this
highly harmful interference continues
until now. These American lies and
deception must be revealed publicly to
our peoples.
A few days ago, a friend and ally of the
United States – it is not an Iranian
official –, the President of Turkey
Erdogan, openly accused the United
States to continue to financially
support ISIS. I tell him that they do
not only help them with money. But let
us be content with this statement. He is
the President of a large and powerful
state, and stated publicly, in a speech
before the people – these are not the
statements recorded in secret – that the
United States continue to this date to
support ISIS financially because the
United States is still committed to
using ISIS.
And the danger is that ISIS is restored
again by the Americans in the next
stage, with a new name, new slogans and
new forms to accomplish the same
missions accomplished by ISIS. [...]
====
Note regarding comments
You
spoke and we listened. It is no longer
necessary for ICH readers to register before
placing a comment. This website encourages
readers to use the "Report" link found at
the base of each comment. When a
predetermined number of ICH readers click on
the "Report" link, the comment will be
automatically sent to "moderation". This
would appear to be the most logical way to
allow open comments, where you the
reader/supporter, can determine what is
acceptable speech. Please don't use the
report feature simply because you disagree
with the author point of view. Treat others
with respect, remembering that "A man
convinced against his will, is of the same
opinion still."- Benjamin Franklin.
Please
read our Comment Policy
before posting -
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)