October
24, 2017 "Information
Clearing House"
- None
of the reforms, increased training, diversity
programs, community outreach and gimmicks such
as body cameras have blunted America’s deadly
police assault, especially against poor people
of color. Police forces in the United
States—which, according to The Washington Post,
have
fatally shot 782 people
this year—are unaccountable, militarized
monstrosities that spread fear and terror in
poor communities. By comparison, police in
England and Wales
killed 62 people
in the 27 years between the start of 1990 and
the end of 2016.
Police officers have become rogue predators in
impoverished communities. Under U.S.
forfeiture laws,
police indiscriminately seize money, real
estate, automobiles and other assets. In many
cities, traffic, parking and other fines are
little more than legalized extortion that funds
local government and turns jails into debtor
prisons.
Because
of a failed court system, millions of young men
and women are railroaded into prison, many for
nonviolent offenses. SWAT teams with military
weapons burst into homes often under warrants
for nonviolent offenses, sometimes shooting
those inside. Trigger-happy cops pump multiple
rounds into the backs of unarmed men and women
and are rarely charged with murder. And for poor
Americans, basic constitutional rights,
including due process, were effectively
abolished decades ago.
Jonathan Simon’s “Governing
Through Crime”
and Michelle Alexander’s “The
New Jim Crow”
point out that what is defined and targeted as
criminal activity by the police and the courts
is largely determined by racial inequality and
class, and most importantly by the potential of
targeted groups to cause social and political
unrest. Criminal policy, as sociologist Alex S.
Vitale writes in his new book, “The
End of Policing,”
“is structured around the use of punishment to
manage the ‘dangerous classes,’ masquerading as
a system of justice.”
The criminal justice system, at the same time,
refuses to hold Wall Street banks, corporations
and oligarchs accountable for crimes that have
caused incalculable damage to the global economy
and the ecosystem. None of the bankers who
committed massive acts of fraud and were
responsible for the financial collapse in 2008
have gone to prison even though their crimes
resulted in widespread unemployment, millions of
evictions and foreclosures, homelessness,
bankruptcies and the looting of the U.S.
Treasury to bail out financial speculators at
taxpayer expense. We live in a two-tiered legal
system, one in which poor people are harassed,
arrested and jailed for absurd infractions, such
as selling loose cigarettes—which led to
Eric Garner
being choked to death by a New York City
policeman in 2014—while crimes of appalling
magnitude that wiped out 40 percent of the
world’s wealth are dealt with through tepid
administrative controls, symbolic fines and
civil enforcement.
The grotesque distortions of the judicial system
and the aggressive war on the poor by the police
will get worse under President Trump and
Attorney General Jeff Sessions. There has been a
rollback of President Barack Obama’s 2015
restrictions on
the 1033 Program,
a 1989 congressional action that allows the
transfer of military weaponry, including grenade
launchers, armored personnel carriers and
.50-caliber machine guns, from the federal
government to local police forces. Since 1997,
the Department of Defense has turned over a
staggering $5.1 billion in military hardware to
police departments.
The Trump administration also is resurrecting
private prisons in the federal prison system,
accelerating the so-called war on drugs,
stacking the courts with right-wing “law and
order” judges and preaching the divisive
politics of punishment and retribution. Police
unions enthusiastically embrace these actions,
seeing in them a return to the Wild West
mentality that characterized the brutality of
police departments in the 1960s and 1970s, when
radicals, especially black radicals, were
murdered with impunity at the hands of law
enforcement. The
Praetorian Guard
of the elites, as in all totalitarian systems,
will soon be beyond the reach of the law. As
Vitale writes in his book, “Our entire criminal
justice system has become a gigantic revenge
factory.”
The arguments—including the racist one about “superpredators“—used
to justify the expansion of police power have no
credibility, as the gun violence in south
Chicago, abject failure of the war on drugs and
vast expansion of the prison system over the
last 40 years illustrate. The problem is not
ultimately in policing techniques and
procedures; it is in the increasing reliance on
the police as a form of social control to
buttress a system of corporate capitalism that
has turned the working poor into modern-day
serfs and abandoned whole segments of the
society. Government no longer makes any attempt
to ameliorate racial and economic inequality.
Instead, it criminalizes poverty. It has turned
the poor into one more cash crop for the rich.
“By
conceptualizing the problem of policing as one
of inadequate training and professionalization,
reformers fail to directly address how the very
nature of policing and the legal system served
to maintain and exacerbate racial inequality,”
Vitale writes. “By calling for colorblind ‘law
and order’ they strengthen a system that puts
people of color at a structural disadvantage. At
the root, they fail to appreciate that the basic
nature of the police, since its earliest
origins, is to be a tool for managing inequality
and maintaining the status quo. Police reforms
that fail to directly address this reality are
doomed to reproduce it. …Well-trained police
following proper procedures are still going to
be arresting people for mostly low-level
offenses, and the burden of that will continue
to fall primarily on communities of color
because that is how the system is designed to
operate—not because of the biases or
misunderstandings of officers.”
In a
recent interview, Vitale told me, “We’ve been
waging a war on drugs for 40 years by putting
people in prison for ever longer sentences. Yet
drugs are cheaper, easier to get, and at a
higher quality than they’ve ever been. Any high
school student in America can get any kind of
drugs they want. Yet we persist in this idea
that the way to respond to the problem of drugs,
and many other social problems, is through
arrest, courts, punishments, prisons. This is
what Trump is playing to. This idea that the
only appropriate role for the state is one of
coercion and threats—whether it’s in the foreign
policy sphere or in the domestic sphere.”
No
Advertising
- No
Government
Grants -
This Is
Independent
Media
Police
forces, as Vitale writes in his book, were not
formed to ensure public safety or prevent crime.
They were created by the property classes to
maintain economic and political dominance and
exert control over slaves, the poor, dissidents
and labor unions that challenged the wealthy’s
hold on power and ability to amass personal
fortunes. Many of America’s policing techniques,
including widespread surveillance, were
pioneered and perfected in colonies of the U.S.
and then brought back to police departments in
the homeland. Blacks in the South had to be
controlled, and labor unions and radical
socialists in the industrial Northeast and
Midwest had to be broken.
The fundamental role of the police has never
changed. Paul Butler in his book “Chokehold:
Policing Black Men”
and James Forman Jr. in his book “Locking
Up Our Own:
Crime and Punishment in Black America” echo
Vitale’s point that the war on drugs “has never
been about public health or public safety. It’s
been about providing a cover for aggressive and
invasive policing that targets almost
exclusively people of color.”
“People often point to the London Metropolitan
Police, who were formed in the 1820s by
Sir Robert Peel,”
Vitale said. “They are held up as this liberal
ideal of a dispassionate, politically neutral
police with the support of the citizenry. But
this really misreads the history. Peel is sent
to manage the British occupation of Ireland.
He’s confronted with a dilemma. Historically,
peasant uprisings, rural outrages were dealt
with by either the local militia or the British
military. In the wake of the Napoleonic Wars, in
the need for soldiers in other parts of the
British Empire, he is having more and more
difficulty managing these disorders. In
addition, when he does call out the militia,
they often open fire on the crowd and kill lots
of people, creating martyrs and inflaming
further unrest. He said, ‘I need a force that
can manage these outrages without inflaming
passions further.’ He developed the Peace
Preservation Force, which was the first attempt
to create a hybrid military-civilian force that
can try to win over the population by embedding
itself in the local communities, taking on some
crime control functions, but its primary purpose
was always to manage the occupation. He then
exports that model to London as the industrial
working classes are flooding the city, dealing
with poverty, cycles of boom and bust in the
economy, and that becomes their primary
mission.”
“The
creation of the very first state police force in
the United States was the Pennsylvania State
Police in 1905,” Vitale said. “For the same
reasons. It was modeled similarly on U.S.
occupation forces in the Philippines. There was
a back and forth with personnel and ideas. What
happened was local police were unable to manage
the coal strikes and iron strikes. … They needed
a force that was more adherent to the interest
of capital. … Interestingly, for these
small-town police forces in a coal mining town
there was sometimes sympathy. They wouldn’t open
fire on the strikers. So, the state police force
was created to be that strong arm for the law.
Again, the direct connection between colonialism
and the domestic management of workers. … It’s a
two-way exchange. As we’re developing ideas
throughout our own colonial undertakings,
bringing those ideas home, and then refining
them and shipping them back to our partners
around the world who are often despotic regimes
with close economic relationships to the United
States. There’s a very sad history here of the
U.S. exporting basically models of policing that
morphs into death squads and horrible human
rights abuses.”
The almost exclusive alliance on militarized
police to deal with profound inequality and
social problems is turning poor neighborhoods in
cities such as Chicago into miniature failed
states, ones where destitute young men and women
join a gang for security and income and engage
in battles with other gangs and the police. The
“broken windows” policy
shifts the burden for poverty onto the poor. It
criminalizes minor infractions, arguing that
disorder produces crime and upending decades of
research about the causes of crime.
“As
poverty deepens and housing prices rise,
government support for affordable housing has
evaporated, leaving in its wake a combination of
homeless shelters and aggressive
broken-windows-oriented policing,” Vitale
writes. “As mental health facilities close,
police become the first responders to calls for
assistance with mental health crises. As youth
are left without adequate schools, jobs, or
recreational facilities, they form gangs for
mutual protection or participate in the black
markets of stolen goods, drugs, and sex to
survive and are ruthlessly criminalized. Modern
policing is largely a war on the poor that does
little to make people safer or communities
stronger, and even when it does, this is
accomplished through the most coercive forms of
state power that destroy the lives of millions.”
The
accelerated assault on the poor and the growing
omnipotence of the police signal our
transformation into an authoritarian state in
which the rich and the powerful are not subject
to the rule of law. The Trump administration
will promote none of the conditions that could
ameliorate this crisis—affordable housing;
well-paying jobs; safe and nurturing schools
that do not charge tuition; better mental health
facilities; efficient public transportation; the
rebuilding of the nation’s infrastructure;
demilitarized police forces in which most
officers do not carry weapons; universal,
government-funded health care; an end to the
predatory loans and unethical practices of big
banks; and reparations to African-Americans and
an end to racial segregation. Trump and most of
those he has appointed to positions of power
disdain the poor as a dead weight on society.
They blame stricken populations for their own
misery. They seek to subjugate the poor,
especially those of color, through police
violence, ever harsher forms of punishment and
an expansion of the prison system.
“We
need an effective system of crime prevention
and control in our communities, but that is not
what the current system is,” Alexander writes in
“The New Jim Crow.” “The system is better
designed to create crime, and a perpetual class
of people labeled criminal. … Saying mass
incarceration is an abysmal failure makes sense,
though only if one assumes that the criminal
justice system is designed to prevent and
control crime. But if mass incarceration is
understood as a system of social
control—specifically, racial control—then the
system is a fantastic success.”
How to
Prevent Police From Stripping Citizens’ Rights
Alex
Vitale, author of "The End of Policing" and
Professor of Sociology and Coordinator of the
Policing & Social Justice Project at Brooklyn
College, discusses the origins of modern
policing and how to prevent law enforcement from
stripping away citizens' rights. RT
Correspondent Anya Parampil looks at the
expansion of police powers.
This
article was originally published by Truth
Dig-
Your support has
kept ICH free on the Web since 2002.
Do
you agree or disagree with the article? -
Please
read our Comment Policy
before posting - It is unacceptable to slander, smear or engage in personal attacks on
other ICH community members or authors of articles posted on
this website. Click here to comment on our Facebook page
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)