September 30,
2017 "Information
Clearing House"
-
I just finished reading
what may be the single best takedown of the US
establishment’s Russia narrative that anyone has
published so far. In
an article titled “Russia-gate’s Shaky Foundation”,
Consortium News’
Daniel Herman meticulously goes over many of the
major glaring plot holes in the official story about
Russia’s involvement in the 2016 presidential
election after reminding us of America’s extensive
and well-documented history of using lies, false
flags and propaganda to manufacture public support
for war.
It’s a
very thorough beatdown on the way the American
people are being asked to swallow a collection of
extremely grave charges with unfathomably dangerous
implications about being “at war” with the planet’s
only other nuclear weapons superpower based on
amazingly flimsy evidence provided by known liars
and manipulators. I highly recommend reading it and
sharing it widely, even though the response from
many Americans will be to put their fingers in their
ears and hum the latest Pepsi jingle to
escape the cognitive discomfort
of realizing they’ve been completely wrong about
everything and having their entire worldview ripped
to shreds.
Russiagate is
bullshit. We’re seeing nothing other than the boring
repetition of the same tired old patterns we’ve been
seeing from the American war machine for the
entirety of living memory, repackaged in a shiny new
2010s wrapper with pictures of hackers and Twitter
bots on it. The US power establishment is working to
manufacture support for escalations with Russia for
the same exact reason it has worked to manufacture
support for escalations with all the other
governments that it has bullied into submission over
the years: to prevent the rise of any global power
that could weaken the hegemony of the US plutocracy.
This is why
America acts so goddamn crazy all the time, and it’s
also one of the major obstacles to getting any kind
of robust peace movement up and running in the US.
The fact of the matter is that America is conducting
a nonstop campaign to destabilize, manipulate, bully
and control other nations to prevent the rise of a
new rival superpower, and many Americans
would rather it
keep doing so. I can’t tell you how many
Americans I’ve encountered while sharing my anti-war
message who have said “Yeah, I agree war is bad and
we’ve done some awful shit…
but if the
world is going to have a top dog controlling its
affairs, I’d rather it be America.”
That’s it.
Right there. That tells the entire story of public
support for the US war machine in a nutshell. The
crux of the issue is that you cannot want America to
remain the world’s only powerful force and also be
anti-war at the same time. These are necessarily two
mutually exclusive ideals. One of the crucial ways
that America remains on top is by keeping potential
rivals off-balance using endless war in key
strategic locations — if you stop the US war machine
from doing this, you cripple America’s ability to
ensure that it remains the world’s only superpower.
No
anti-war philosophy is complete unless it directly
addresses this fundamental reality.
If you want America to remain the
world’s leader while also wanting America to stop
waging endless wars based on lies, you’re not
anti-war, you’re a vapid, cutesy vanity politics
airhead sharing social media-friendly bumper sticker
ideals with nothing behind them. You don’t want the
killing to stop, you just want to
look like
someone who wants the killing to stop.
The fact
that US warmongering plays an essential role in
maintaining its status as the world’s only
superpower is not a secret, by the way. Washington’s
neoconservatives, whose bloodthirsty policies have
been consistently snaking their way into the
mainstream platforms of both parties for decades,
are completely transparent about this. The extremely
influential neocon think tank Project for a New
American Century’s most well-known publication, “Rebuilding
America’s Defenses: Strategies, Forces, and
Resources For a New Century”,
argues extensively that America’s victory in the
Cold War against its only rival superpower means the
US must step into a planetary leadership role and
maintain that leadership role by any means
necessary, including military force.
No
Advertising
- No
Government
Grants -
This Is
Independent
Media
“As the
20th century draws to a close,” PNAC’s
Statement of Principles
reads, “the United States stands as the world’s
preeminent power. Having led the West to victory in
the Cold War, America faces an opportunity and a
challenge: Does the United States have the vision to
build upon the achievements of past decades? Does
the United States have the resolve to shape a new
century favorable to American principles and
interests?”
The answer to
this question came after 9/11: yes, yes it does. The
New American Century has seen an immense increase in
military interventionism across the globe to ensure
the hegemony of the US dollar and prevent Russia and
China from climbing the global power ladder
unchecked.
So the
question being asked of all peace-loving Americans,
really, is this: are you courageous enough to
relinquish your attachment to the neoconservative
notion that America should be the world’s only
superpower? Are you truly anti-war, or are you a
neocon with a ‘Coexist’ bumper sticker?
Noam
Chomsky
recently said that
America “has been the safest country in the world
forever, and the most frightened country in the
world.” Indeed, America’s borders are
easily-defended and remote from areas of potential
conflict, which was why the country was able to
surge ahead in the world after World War 2 while
everyone else was rebuilding their industrial
infrastructure from the rubble. It’s also why an
extremely powerful billionaire class has set up its
home base there; the plutocracy’s investments are
well-protected in an easily-defended nation.
America is the
safest country in the world and the most frightened
country in the world, but if its people truly want
to stop the wars they’re going to have to find some
courage. America can maintain a strong military to
defend itself without being spread out over hundreds
of military bases throughout the globe and engaging
in endless acts of military interventionism to keep
other countries down. If it can build a real economy
that isn’t propped up at the barrel of a gun it can
even remain a major force in the world. But the fear
of another country becoming powerful elsewhere on
the planet will need to be relinquished before wars
can come to an end.
The reason the
US power establishment works so hard to manufacture
public support for its wars is that it needs that
support. The public can make things very, very
difficult for the war machine if it stops listening
to the propaganda lullabies and decides enough is
enough. But that can’t happen as long as the
American people are living in fear of the rest of
the world. If you want peace, at some point you’re
going to have to get okay with letting the world
manage its own affairs. There will be no significant
peace movement in America until this happens.
Caitlin Johnstone
is a 100 percent reader-funded journalist so if you
enjoyed this, please consider helping me out by
sharing it around, liking me on Facebook,
following me on Twitter,
or throwing some money into my hat on Patreon.
Your support has
kept ICH free on the Web since 2002.
Do
you agree or disagree with the article? -
Please
read our Comment Policy
before posting - It is unacceptable to slander, smear or engage in personal attacks on
other ICH community members or authors of articles posted on
this website. Click here to comment on our Facebook page
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)