Patriotism
Is A Two-Edged Sword
By Paul Craig
Roberts
September
29, 2017 "Information
Clearing House"
- I sometimes wonder if America’s greatest threat
is the population’s hyper-patriotism. The bulk of
the population is now at work shutting down the NFL
players’ First Amendment rights, and none of the
incensed censors are capable of understanding that
it is they, and not the NFL players, who are
attacking the U.S. Constitution. We have been
through all this flag business before, and federal
courts have ruled for the protesters who burnt
flags, wore them on their clothes, whatever. Yet,
here we go again.
Hardwick
Clothes CEO pulls the company’s advertising from NFL
games. Insofar as advertising helps Hardwick’s
shareholders, CEO Allan Jones is hurting his own
shareholders in order to protest the NFL players’
protests, a thought that probably never occurred to
him.
http://ijr.com/the-declaration/2017/09/984704-first-ceo-hits-nfl-right-wallet-unpatriotic-national-anthem-protests/
According to this report —
http://www.dcclothesline.com/2017/09/26/americans-nationwide-burn-nfl-tickets-shirts-in-solidarity-with-trump/
— white people
across the country are burning their NFL shirts and
their expensive tickets for which they paid hundreds
of dollars.
A Louisiana
state representative has introduced legislation to
ban state subsidies for the New Orleans Saints
because of their “disgraceful protests.” It is OK
with Rep. Kenny Havard for Louisiana taxpayers to
give hundreds of millions of dollars in subsidies to
the NFL team as long as the players stand for the
anthem, but not if they don’t. It apparently never
occurred to Havard to question whether relatively
poor Louisiana taxpayers should be giving hundreds
of millions of dollars to a billionaire team owner.
There is no doubt that the average salary of the
Saints exceeds the average salary of Louisiana
taxpayers.
http://ijr.com/the-declaration/2017/09/984526-louisiana-state-rep-pushes-make-nfl-team-pay-national-anthem-protests-literally/
Former NFL
quarterback John Elway declares: “I believe that
this is the greatest country in the world,” and his
personal belief takes care of the numerous
protesters who clearly have a different view.
http://ijr.com/the-declaration/2017/09/984449-john-elway-responds-anthem-protests-nfl-players-pay-attention-words/
Bill
O’Reilly makes a guest appearance on Fox
News berating the NFL protesters for ignoring the
effect on US soldiers in Afghanistan who “are
putting their life on the line.” Apparently, after
all these years it still has not occurred to
O’Reilly that the soldiers’ lives — and those of
Afghans — are being put on the line by the
military/security complex’s drive for profits and
the neoconservative drive for US and Israeli
hegemony.
http://ijr.com/the-declaration/2017/09/984598-oreilly-makes-return-fox-news-remind-nfl-players-soldiers-fighting-3000-miles-away/
Trump sends
out emails: “Do you stand with President Trump, our
flag, and this great country” against the NFL
protesters?
The
childishness of it all is an American embarrassment.
The
patriotic response is not only an attack on the
First Amendment but also plays into the hands of
Identity Politics, which has its own take on the
matter. Julio Rosas writes in the HuffPost that
standing for the national anthem is standing for
white supremacy.
http://ijr.com/the-declaration/2017/09/984655-huffpost-op-ed-white-athletes-stand-national-anthem-stand-white-supremacy/
Before a
few dimwits send me emails demanding explanation why
I stand for anti-American minorities against “the
greatest country in the world,” let us all first
consider where this is going. The answer is: nowhere
good. The hyper-patriotism that is being whipped up
is so irrational that it is against the
self-interests of the counter-protesters, who are
hurting the visibility of their merchandising brand
and costing the shareholders profits, burning their
clothing and expensive football tickets, and denying
themselves their favorite entertainment.
The
military/security complex, the hegemonic
neoconservatives, and the Israel Lobby are sitting
there, licking their chops. They know what to do
with this display of ignorant patriotism. They will
turn it against Iran, North Korea, China, and
Russia. Their profits will flow even higher, neocon
ambitions will be realized, and Israel will have the
US eliminate another country — Iran — in the way of
its expansion. Or so they think.
Russia
cannot afford a vassal of Washington in Iran or the
type of chaos in Iran that now engulfs Iraq and
Libya. It is a short distance from Iran through
Azerbaijan or Turkmenistan into Muslim areas of
Russia and former Muslim provinces of the Soviet
Union. If Iran falls, Russia is the next to be
destabilized. Additionally, Iran in Washington’s
hands extends to the East Washington’s surrounding
of Russia. The Russian government would be
confronted with US missile bases on its borders
ranging from the Baltics through eastern and
southern Europe, Ukraine, Georgia and Iran.
Moreover, US missiles in Iran could reach China in a
few minutes as can the US missile bases being
constructed on China’s Pacific border under the
guise of countering “the North Korean threat.”
China
depends on Iran for 20 percent of its oil supply.
China was forced out of its Libyan oil supply by
Washington’s overthrow of Gaddafi. Losing Iran would
be a blow. At some point these two powerful
countries will have to realize that their national
existence is at stake. China has been too busy
making money to pay attention, and Russia has been
in thrall to its centuries-old desire to be part of
the West.
The Russian
government’s policy of replying to Washington’s
aggression with diplomacy has failed totally. This
policy has been extremely expensive to Russia and
today is a direct threat to Russia’s national
survival. Whether Russia is too controlled by
Washington and Israeli-installed billionaires to
attend to its national interests remains to be seen.
China’s
lust for riches is a non-substitute for national
survival.
Washington
is counting on these singular weaknesses of the only
two countries capable of serving as a check on
Washington’s unilateralism.
However,
there are countervailing powers in Russia and China.
The Operation Command of the Russian High Command
has publicly given its opinion that Washington is
preparing a surprise nuclear attack on Russia. It
would be derelict beyond comprehension for President
Putin to ignore this conclusion. Inside China,
historic pride is a rival influence to the lust for
riches. The Chinese are determined never again to be
a mere playground for foreign powers.
Sooner or
later even the hubris-overstuffed Zionist Lobby will
realize that the American war against Iran that
Israel is demanding is a fuse for a Third World War
and that the Jews will be destroyed along with
everyone else. From the “Nile to the Euphrates” will
be a wasteland.
On this
website on September 27, 2017, I addressed what can
be done from the Western side to reduce the tensions
that are leading to nuclear armageddon. On the
Russian and Chinese side what can be done is a
tri-party mutual defense pact between Russia, Iran,
and China that is made public. This would tell the
psychopaths in Washington and Israel that an attack
on Iran means World War III.
If this is
not a deterrent, then Washington and Israel are lost
to evil, and life on earth is ended.
Dr. Paul
Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the
Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of
the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for
Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and
Creators Syndicate. He has had many university
appointments. His internet columns have attracted a
worldwide following. Roberts' latest books are
The Failure of Laissez Faire
Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West,
How America Was Lost,
and
The Neoconservative Threat to
World Order. |