America’s Policy of Nuclear
Annihilation Is the Problem
By Finian Cunningham
August 16,
2017 "Information
Clearing House"
- The
threats from US President Donald Trump and the
Pentagon to «destroy the North Korean people» –
said with such casual cold heartedness – shows
that the American ruling class has no
compunction about committing the supreme crime
of genocide against innocent civilians.
Those threats to North Korea,
coming in the same week that the world marked
the 72nd anniversary of the Americans
dropping two atomic bombs on the Japanese cities
of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 killing over
200,000 people, are deeply connected. An
understanding of the connection is essential to
achieving a peaceful resolution of the current
crisis and the avoidance of a catastrophic war.
Speaking from his New Jersey
private golf club, Trump glibly said the power
that the US would unleash against North Korea
would be «like something the world has never
seen before». This bravado utterance of carrying
out such devastation demonstrates the genocidal
mentality that underpins the American rulers.
Trump’s words were repeated by his Pentagon
chief James Mattis who warned the North Korean
people of imminent «destruction».
To make any kind of equivalence
between the Communist North Korean state and the
US rulers is absurd. The vast disproportionate
nuclear arsenals is one issue for a start. So
too is the difference in geographical posture:
American forces based in South Korea are on
North Korea’s border, not the other way around.
Also the rhetoric: Kim Jong-un
may use rhetoric about turning the US «into
ashes», but the North Korean policy is always in
the context of maintaining self-defense and in
response to what it sees as American aggression.
Washington’s rhetoric on the other hand is one
of offensive aggression – and has been for
decades. «Keeping all options on the table,» is
code for retaining the self-ordained right to
launch a pre-emptive military strike, including
the use of nuclear weapons.
Not only is the genocidal
mentality of American rulers consistent with the
horrific crime against Japan 72 years ago, so
too are the geopolitics. The real reason why
Washington dropped the atomic bombs on August 6
and 9, 1945, was to prevent the anticipated
capture of Japan and the Korean Peninsula by the
advancing Soviet Union. The Americans were
already thinking ahead of the postwar global
carve-up and were adamant to prevent Communism
winning the territorial spoils from the defeat
of Nazi and Japanese fascism.
As Martin Hart-Landsberg recounts
in his superb book on Korean history, the
purpose of the American first strike with
nuclear weapons on Japan was to cast a shadow of
terror on the region and thereby to halt the
advance of Soviet forces in the Pacific, in
particular from the total liberation of all of
Korea in alliance with the Korean Communist
resistance guerrillas who had been fighting to
overthrow Japanese colonial occupation.
From the nuclear genocide in
Japan, arose the inevitable division of Korea
into a Communist North and a pro-Western South,
reconstituted from Korean quislings who had
consorted with Japanese imperial occupation
(1910-45). Although progressive democratic
politics have gained strength and governing
power in South Korea over the past two decades,
the South Korean state was marked for its first
four decades after the war as being
authoritarian, fascistic and a legacy of
Japanese colonialist politics – and, of course,
pro-American.
During the Korean War (1950-53),
the American military backing the South
contemplated the use of nuclear weapons against
the Communist North and its Chinese ally.
Nuclear-capable American bombers would fly over
the northern territory in a deliberate act of
terror. The people were compelled to live in
caves because the Americans had destroyed every
city with conventional weapons killing up to two
million civilians in the process.
When American forces today fly
nuclear-capable B-1 bombers over the Korean
Peninsula – as they did again this week just as
Trump was issuing his «fire and fury» diatribe –
the people of North Korea have every reason to
fear Armageddon from the skies. They have been
subjected to it within living memory, and ever
since the end of the Korean War they have had to
live under the American shadow of genocide.
The Americans refused to sign a
peace treaty at the end of the Korean War in
1953. Technically, therefore, the US is still at
war in the peninsula. The perennial presence of
American military forces in South Korea and the
multiple war maneuvers conducted every year is a
stark reminder to the North that hostilities
could resume at any time.
Let’s put this into proper
perspective, as opposed to being hoodwinked by
Western media bias and distortion. North Korea
is a reclusive state largely because it has been
living under an unlawful siege from American
forces for 64 years. A lot of what the Western
public know about North Korea is from
caricatures leveled by American propaganda aimed
at demonizing the enemy. But from what we can
tell from fragments of information, the people
are largely content with their political system.
So why don’t we just let them live in peace?
After all, North Korea has not attacked any of
its neighbors, nor does it interfere in the
region. All it wants is to have the right to
exist peacefully, and not under the continual
threat of nuclear annihilation by the United
States. Hence, it devotes much of its national
resources to its nuclear arms program.
Lawrence Wilkerson, who served in
the US State Department during the G W Bush
presidency, candidly admits that negotiations
with North Korea were never honored by
Washington. Wilkerson worked with the North
Koreans on an earlier nuclear accord during the
2000s, in which Pyongyang committed to scrap its
nuclear weapons program in exchange for Western
aid to develop civilian atomic energy. But, he
says, the Bush administration reneged on its
side of the bargain, referring to North Korea as
«an axis of evil». Reasonably, Pyongyang then
resorted to building up its defenses with
nuclear weapons.
When President Trump this week
disparaged «the failures» of previous Clinton,
Bush and Obama administrations in dealing with
North Korea, he was either mendacious or
ignorant – probably the latter. The «failure» of
US policy in Korea is that it has deliberately
never allowed diplomacy to succeed.
No
Advertising
- No
Government
Grants
-
This
Is
Independent
Media
That’s because American
geopolitics is fundamentally all about
maintaining hegemonic ambitions of dominance,
not just in Asia-Pacific but in every other
region of the world. It is an essential part of
how US capitalism functions. That dominance is
underpinned by American military aggression –
and in particular the self-ordained right to
wage war on anyone who dares to defy the
American global order, including the pre-emptive
use of nuclear weapons on civilians.
Former British
foreign minister Malcolm Rifkind in an article this
week for Russia’s Valdai discussion forum,
asserted that: «There is no simple solution
available to resolve this [Korean] crisis». Why
intelligent Russians would feel obliged to
listen to the likes of Rifkind is a curious
question.
In any case, Rifkind is plain
wrong. There may appear to be no simple solution
in the mindset of people like Rifkind who are
imbued with pro-US imperialist propaganda and
who unquestioningly view North Korea as «the
problem». (Just as these same kind of people
regard Iran, Russia, Venezuela, Syria, Cuba and
so on as problems.)
But in actual fact there is a
straightforward and accurate solution to the
never-ending conflict in Korea.
That is, for the US to withdraw
its military and its relentless threats of
aggression towards North Korea. The US needs to
sit down with North Korea and the other nations
of the region, including China and Russia, and
discuss as equals the requirements for peaceful
coexistence. For a start, the US should be
compelled to sign a decades-overdue peace treaty
with North Korea and to openly state that it
repudiates the use of violence for its political
objectives.
A solution is at hand. It simply
requires the US to start abiding by
international law and to renounce its genocidal
prerogative to destroy other people.
The stronger powers in the
region, Russia and China, must insist on this
basic requirement. They must state clearly that
all-party talks should be convened immediately
and that all sides must commit to peaceful
settlement. No exceptions, no excuses.
What is ultimately problematic –
and the world will see this – is that the United
States as we know it under its ruling system
will not and cannot abide by this simple
solution. Because it is inherently a
warmongering rogue regime which «exceptionally»
arrogates the «right» to cast the shadow of
annihilation on the rest of the world.
Finian
Cunningham has written extensively on
international affairs, with articles published
in several languages. He is a Master’s graduate
in Agricultural Chemistry and worked as a
scientific editor for the Royal Society of
Chemistry, Cambridge, England, before pursuing a
career in newspaper journalism. He is also a
musician and songwriter. For nearly 20 years, he
worked as an editor and writer in major news
media organisations, including The Mirror, Irish
Times and Independent.
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)