Islamic Terrorism: Our Ally For 38 Years
By
Chris Kanthan
June
14, 2017 "Information
Clearing House"
- Dear Diary, I can’t show this letter to the
innocent people of America and the world, so
it’s just between you and me. Imagine the shock
and the outrage if I say that we have to embrace
Islamic terrorism! The average person doesn’t
understand what’s at stake and how sometimes the
elites need to rely on “controlled chaos” for
the greater good.
Islamic
terrorists are wonderful instruments for proxy
wars – they cost very little but fight
fearlessly. They are a global resource that can
be brought into any local conflict. They are
also expendable – we use them when convenient
and kill them when inconvenient.
If this
shocks the conscience of people, it just means
they haven’t been paying keen attention.
Consider the following examples:
-
Thomas Friedman
of The New York Times wrote that we
shouldn’t attack ISIS in Syria
1;
and we should even consider arming
ISIS to overthrow Assad
2
-
John Kerry admitted, “U.S. tried to
use ISIS to force Assad into negotiations.”
3
-
Israeli military chief explained, “Israel
prefers ISIS to Assad”
4
-
Israeli defense
minister recounted, “ISIS never
intentionally attacks us; and when it
happened once, ISIS apologized immediately.”
5
Hello!
-
Hillary Clinton wrote, “Saudi Arabia
and Qatar fund and arm ISIS.”
6
-
Joe Biden, Gen.
Martin Dempsey, Gen. Wesley Clark all have
stated that US allies in the Middle
East arm and fund Al Qaeda and ISIS.
7,
8,
9
-
Several State Department cables have clearly
laid out how Saudi Arabia is the #1
source of funding for terrorism around the
world – not just in the Middle
East.
10
Ever
wonder why we never go to war against or impose
sanctions on these sponsors of terrorism? Heck
we don’t even condemn them!
What goes through a reader’s mind when they see
an article titled “Accepting Al Qaeda”
11
that is published by Council on Foreign
Relations – the think tank behind US foreign
policy? Or when Hillary Clinton’s chief foreign
policy advisor wrote to her, “Al Qaeda
is on our side”?
12
I can
give many more such examples, but let’s hop on
the time machine for a moment.
Afghanistan, 1979 – 1989. We used the Mujahideen
to defeat the Soviet Union. Was that not a good
thing? Remember how the media and Hollywood
glorified those Afghan fighters in the 1980’s?
The Afghan rebels even got to visit the White
House.
There
are two critical factors that are often
forgotten in the Mujahideen story: foreign
fighters from all over the world and
fundamentalist Islam.
In the 1980’s, more than 35,000 so-called
Arab Afghans came from all over the world
to fight the Russians
13;
and we wouldn’t have been able to motivate them
to do so without appealing to the concept of
Islam, Caliphate or jihad. “Fight for Allah” is
far more effective than “Fight for Country X.”
Fighters motivated by religion are also
extremely useful in the battlefield since they
are not afraid of death. This mindset is
essential for the use of suicide bombers without
whom many battles and wars would not have been
won.
We also
learned from Saudi Arabia that indoctrination is
essential to create good soldiers. So the CIA
came up with clever textbooks for Afghan kids
that introduced them to concepts of jihad,
weapons and hatred for Russians.
14
(Since then, Saudi Arabia has spent billions of
dollars on Islamic schools – Madrassas – all
over the world. These schools act as breeding
grounds for future activists, extremists and
fighters. Saudis also print textbooks that are
used all over the world. Kids learn loving
messages such as “Kill Shiites, Christians
and Jews.”
15
Saudi mosques and preachers all over the world
also continue spreading extremist messages.)
When
the Afghan war was about to be won, it dawned on
us that the Mujahideen project was a brilliant
playbook that could be replicated in other parts
of the world.
That’s
when Al Qaeda was formed. And it was
perfect timing.
You
see, Halliburton had just discovered huge oil
reserves near the Caspian Sea, but the countries
around that region were all pro-Russia even
after the fall of the USSR.
16
Without the knowledge of the American public,
the Mujahideen were very active all throughout
the 1990’s in Bosnia, Kosovo, Azerbaijan,
Uzbekistan, Dagestan, Chechnya etc.
17
These fighters were used for three major
purposes:
-
throw out pro-Russia dictators
-
install pro-West leaders who would help us
build oil/gas pipelines and agree to host US
military bases, and
-
disrupt Russian pipelines and other
interests
Azerbaijan was an easy one and we got our man in
1993. Georgia took a long time, but George Soros
and his color revolution finally installed our
guy in 2005. Within a year, we had a 1000-mile
pipeline that linked Azerbaijan (Caspian Sea),
Georgia and Turkey!
Chechnya was a partial success. They were
struggling for independence from Russia and thus
gladly welcomed the Mujahideen who also had
plenty of Saudi money and US weapons. Within a
short time, the non-violent and mystical Sufism
of Chechnya was taken over by Saudi Wahhabism.
Al Qaeda started blowing up Russian pipelines.
Russia invaded Chechnya in 1994, lost the war,
and withdrew. It was fun to watch the news those
days. But then Putin became the Prime Minister
three years later, waged a ruthless war against
the jihadists, won decisively and installed his
own strongman in Chechnya
18.
Even Sufism has seen a major revival lately and
Chechens have now started rejecting Wahhabism
and jihadism.
19
Al
Qaeda was extremely helpful in Bosnia, Albania,
Macedonia and Kosovo. In the late 1990’s, we
used trumped-up charges and NATO bombing to get
rid of the pro-Russia guy in Serbia.
Away
from the heart of Eurasia, Islamic extremism and
terrorism play major roles in Africa, Middle
East and Asia to catalyze geopolitical
transformations.
No Advertising - No Government Grants - This Is Independent Media
|
In
Libya, Syria, Yemen and Somalia, we depend on
Muslim Brotherhood, Al Qaeda and Salafists
(those who follow extreme, fundamentalist Sunni
Islam).
In Libya, we leveraged the Al Qaeda affiliate
called Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG)
20.
We released its leader (Belhadj) from the CIA
prison, dressed him up in a nice suit, arranged
a photo-op with John McCain, and he became the
freedom fighter who fought Gaddafi, the brutal
dictator!
In Syria, tens of thousands of Al Qaeda fighters
were flown in from all over the world to topple
Assad
21.
If it were not for Putin’s evil interventions,
we would now have a Qatar pipeline through
Syria, and Israel would be drilling oil in Golan
Heights
22.
A tragic situation indeed.
In
Africa, Nigeria is a strategic country with 170
million people and a land rich in oil and
natural resources. That’s where Boko Haram –
African ISIS – comes into play. It has been
extremely successful in every way. Also, thanks
to Boko Haram, half of Nigeria is under Sharia
Law, which is a great tool to control people.
In
Asia, we need to prevail upon Thailand,
Indonesia and the Philippines. Without them, we
lose much of Asia to China. Sharia Law and
Salafism are gaining momentum in Indonesia,
which is a positive sign.
23
Philippines’ crazy leader, Duterte, has been too
friendly with Russia and China
24.
He will lose his popularity and get replaced if
the ISIS affiliate – Abu Sayyaf – causes enough
problems. If he fights back against ISIS, we
will cry “human rights” and “Islamophobia” at
the UN and impose sanctions.
Thailand has also been foolishly moving into the
Russia-China sphere of influence
25.
Well, this peaceful, Buddhist country has been
facing Sunni/Salafist extremism in the south.
Thai leaders must realize that the entire
tourism industry is very vulnerable – a few
bombings and attacks by jihadists can have
serious effects.
Finally, let’s look at Europe. There has been a
lot of problems with mass immigration –
terrorism, crimes etc. However, every crisis is
an opportunity. Some call it the
Problem-Reaction-Solution.
Terrorism is the problem. Fear is the reaction.
Government is the solution.
Terrorism and crime give us the chance to
militarize the police in EU, create an “NSA” for
entire Europe, and even an EU army. The
financial burden caused by refugees also allows
us to impose austerity and cut wasteful welfare
spending. Mass immigration will also result in a
more homogeneous European society. Twenty years
from now, there won’t be much difference between
France and Germany. This means much easier
management of EU.
Moving forward, the biggest economic challenge
for us will be China. However, it has an
Achilles heel – the western province of Xinjiang
that is predominantly made up of Muslims. With
help from Turkey, we have already created in
Xinjiang an Islamist movement that is calling
for secession
26.
China’s One Belt One Road is very dependent on
freight trains safely traveling through that
region on their way to Europe. Our future
Mujahideen in Xinjiang will come in handy if
China starts to misbehave.
It took
us about 60 years to unify North and South
America to a great degree under a common
financial, corporate, economic and military
system. (Venezuela is the odd man out, but we’re
working on it). It may take another sixty years
to unify Europe, Russia and China. Then we will
have global governance and the ultimate New
World Order. No borders and no walls. One World.
In bringing that to fruition, we have many
arrows in our quiver – trade, financial/military
aid, coups, color revolutions, sanctions, wars
etc. – but Islamic terrorism and fundamentalism
will continue playing indispensable roles, and
that’s why we must accept them and embrace them.
Chris Kanthan is
a computer geek by profession, he is a writer
and an author from San Francisco, trying to
raise awareness about politics, world affairs,
food and health through non-partisan blog posts,
often with a twist of satire. He loves traveling
and has been to 35 countries around the world.
He is also the author of “Deconstructing
Monsanto.”https://worldaffairs.blog
The
views expressed in this article are solely those
of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
opinions of Information Clearing House.