Occupation Of The American Mind - Israel And US
Public Opinion
Video Documentary
A look at
the information wars waged by Israel and its
supporters to win the hearts and minds of the
American people.
An occupation of American media and the American
mind by a pro-Israel narrative that's deflected
attention away from what virtually everyone
recognises as the best way to resolve this
conflict: end the occupation and the settlements
so that Palestinians can finally have a state of
their own.
The
Israeli perspective dominates the American media
and pro-Israel talking points are repeated by
the highest government officials and recycled
endlessly by the media.
How, if
at all, can propaganda be uncovered if the
mainstream point of view is so dominant?
Posted
April 27, 2017
A film
by Loretta Alper and Jeremy Earp
Narrator : Roger Waters Executive Producer : Sut Jhally Associate Producer:
George Matta
The 2014 war on
Gaza saw the
Israeli military launch a devastating attack on
the Gaza Strip. Over the course of 51 days,
Israel dropped nearly 20,000 tonnes of
explosives on Gaza, killing more than 2,000
Palestinians, wounding tens of thousands and
obliterating countless homes. The overwhelming
majority of the casualties were civilians.
The attacks sparked mass protests around the
world, including a thousands-strong march in Tel
Aviv's Rabin Square, with a clear divide between
anti-war and rightist protesters. However, the
American reaction held firm in its support for
Israel, in spite of the atrocities taking place
on the ground. A
CNN/ORC pollconducted
in July of 2014 showed that only four in 10
Americans believed that Israel was using too
much force against the population of Gaza. The
same poll showed that 12 percent of respondents
believed Israel was not using enough force.
However
shocking, the unrelenting American support for
Israel was nothing new. The Israeli perspective
dominates the American media and pro-Israel
talking points are repeated by the highest
government officials and recycled endlessly by
the media. How, if at all, can propaganda be
uncovered if the mainstream point of view is so
dominant?
Zionism, born in the late 1800s, saw the idea of
Jewish entitlement to Palestine come to
fruition. From an estimated 7 percent, the
Jewish population of Palestine grew
exponentially to a third of the total population
by 1947. The events of World War II and the
Holocaust contributed to the number of Jewish
settlers arriving in Palestine. It was then that
the British colonial government handed matters
over to the newly formed United Nations.
UN
Resolution 181 awarded the smaller Jewish
community a significantly larger percentage of
historic Palestine than its Arab population - 56
percent to Palestine's 44, respectively. Arab
leaders rejected the proposal but their protests
went unheard as Zionist leaders declared Israel
a state under the new UN borders, triggering the
first Arab-Israeli war of 1948. A crushing
defeat of the military coalition of Arab states
- including Jordan (then known as TransJordan),
Egypt and Lebanon - saw Israel take control of
78 percent of historic Palestine by the time
armistice was declared in 1949.
No
Advertising - No Government Grants - This Is
Independent Media
In
1967, the Six-Day War would see Israel defeat
much stronger Arab armies, once again. The state
would lay claim to whatever remained of the West
Bank, the Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem. In
spite of the UN Security Council passing
Resolution 242 - a call for Israel to withdraw
its armed forces as per international law
forbidding the takeover of territory by war -
American public opinion of Israeli actions did
not waver.
The 1982 invasion of
Lebanon,
however, saw a change in the favoured tides for
Israel. As images of the Sabra and Shatila
massacre flooded into American news media,
Israel suddenly needed to defend itself. The war
in Lebanon would trigger the need for an
official public relations strategy, known in
Hebrew as "Hasbara". The basic strategy would be
to push back with footage of Palestinians
fighting against the occupation, highlighting
Israel's role as "underdog" and "victim".
However, with the internet and the rise of
social media "news", the Israeli government and
pro-Israel groups have had a harder time
managing American perceptions of the conflict.
How can these changes - if any - be sustained in
the long-term and will the US government ever
manage its media support for Israel's position
in conflict?
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)