In
the current furore over supposed antisemitism in
the Labour Party and the
suspension of Ken Livingstone
for asserting that Hitler supported Zionism, the
crux of the problem seems to have been somewhat
obscured. Livingstone’s intervention was
untimely, uncalled for and clumsily expressed
(it’s never a good idea to bring Hitler into the
discussion) but
the collaboration in the 1930s between Zionist
leaders and Nazi apparatchiks, like Eichmann, is
a historical fact. How was that
possible? How could a Jewish ideology find
common ground with a virulently antisemitic
creed — and at a time when Jews worldwide were
demanding a total boycott of Nazi Germany?
Anyone who
has been in a Zionist youth movement — Habonim
or Hashomer Hatzair — will know that the job of
Zionism is to persuade Jews that they don’t
properly belong in the countries in which they
have lived over the centuries and can only find
their true home in a Jewish state. The Israeli
political parties, Mapam and Mapai, didn’t send
all those well-trained Zionist leaders over here
just to teach Jewish boys and girls how to dance
the Hora. As Ehud Olmert said, when addressing
the World Zionist Congress in 2005,
the Zionist project will not be fulfilled until
every Jew in the world goes to live in Israel.
Nowadays Zionist groups like the Jewish Labour
Movement pretend that Zionist teaching has
changed but they have to say that, otherwise
they might have to ask themselves why they’re
still living ‘in exile’ instead of in the Jewish
state.
‘Money
willingly we give there/Israel is our
guiding star/Not that we would ever live
there/Better worship from afar’.
Similarly when the celebrated Israeli novelist
AB Yehoshua,
interviewed by Jonathan Freedland in the
Guardian,
repeated the demand that all Jews should live in
Israel and called Jewish life in the diaspora
‘neurotic’, Freedland maintained that this was
‘paleo-Zionism’, as if it belonged to an old
ideology, now outdated. But as far as I know
there aren’t 57 varieties of Zionism. There’s
just Zionism, exactly as Olmert and Yehoshua and
our
‘shlichim’ (emissaries) in Hashomer Hatzair
expressed it.
So it is
not difficult to understand how and why, before
the death camps were thought of, the interests
of Jewish nationalism and German nationalism
converged. Both Zionists and Nazis were totally
opposed to Jewish assimilation. To put it
crudely, the Nazis wanted a Jew-free Germany; so
did the Zionists, provided the Jews went to
Palestine to provide the basis of a future
Jewish state.
There existed in those first years, a
mutually highly satisfactory agreement
between the Nazi authorities and the Jewish
Agency for Palestine — a
Ha’avarah or Transfer Agreement, which
provided that an emigrant to Palestine could
transfer his money there in German goods and
exchange them for pounds upon arrival…. The
result was that in the thirties, when
American Jewry took great pains to organise
a boycott of German merchandise, Palestine,
of all places, was swamped with all kinds of
goods made in Germany. — Hannah
Arendt Eichmann in Jerusalem.
There is no doubt that at that time, the Nazi
party adopted a pro-Zionist agenda. So when
Zionist emissaries from Palestine came to
Germany to pick out young Jewish pioneers, they
negotiated on equal terms with Eichmann and the
SS in order to facilitate their transfer to
Palestine. It could be argued that this was a
way of saving at least some German Jews. But
‘the Palestine leadership refused to extend any
help to emigrants whose goal was not Eretz
Israel’. (Saul Friedlander, Zionist historian.)
And Ben Gurion argued that in any conflict of
interest between saving individual Jews and the
good of the Zionist enterprise, the enterprise
must come first.
Consequently the Zionist
leadership opposed the Kindertransport which
brought 10,000 German Jewish children to
England.
There has
always been a symbiotic relationship between
Zionism and antisemitism. Many antisemites
support Zionist ideology and the state of
Israel. Trump’s advisor, Steve Bannon, for
instance. And Eichmann himself, according to
Hannah Arendt, had read Theodor Herzl’s
Der
Judenstaat, the founding text of Zionism,
and became converted ‘promptly and forever to
Zionism’. Conversely, many Zionists are
antisemitic, Herzl, for one. “The wealthy Jews
rule the world “ he wrote in the German
newspaper Deutsche Zeitung “…they start wars
between countries and when they wish,
governments make peace. When the wealthy Jews
sing, the nations and their leaders dance along
and meanwhile the Jews get richer.”
Like
many educated, secular German-speaking Jews,
Herzl despised the mass of Eastern European
Jews. The first solution to the ‘Jewish problem’
offered by the founding father of Zionism was a
mass conversion to Catholicism in Vienna’s St
Stephen’s Cathedral.
The one language that was forbidden to be spoken
in Herzl’s ideal Jewish state was Yiddish.
Contempt for Jewish life outside a Jewish state
has been an enduring feature of Zionism. In his
interview with the Guardian, Yehoshua described
Jews in the diaspora, like Freedland, ‘partial’
Jews, not proper Jews. Ben Gurion, in a
conversation with Isaac Deutscher, echoed Stalin
when he said, ‘They have no roots. They are
rootless cosmopolitans. There can be nothing
worse than that.’ It is no secret that the
poorest, most marginalised Jews living in Israel
are Holocaust survivors. Interviewed on
Channel Four’s Unreported World,
one survivor was asked why he thought they were
treated so badly. ‘Shame,’ he replied. ‘They are
ashamed of us.’
It
seems to me that Zionism doesn’t like Jews much,
which is why it wants to turn them all into
Israelis. ‘In the Zionist school in Palestine,’
writes Uri Avnery,
ex-Irgun, now peace activist and blogger, ‘we
were taught that the essence of Zionism is the
negation of the Diaspora (called Exile in
Hebrew). Not just the physical negation but the
mental, too. Not only the demand that every
single Jew come to the land of Israel but also
the total repudiation of all forms if Jewish
life in exile: their culture and their language,
Yiddish.’
So is
Zionism antisemitic?
Leon
Rosselson, Singer/songwriter, children’s author.
Here you will find provocative musings on
songwriting, politics and life’s little ironies.
The
views expressed in this article are solely those
of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
opinions of Information Clearing House.
Zionism’s
Jewish Enemy
Alan Hart Interviews Professor Ilan Pappe,
Israel’s leading “new” or “revisionist”
historian.
Part 2
No
Advertising - No Government Grants - This Is
Independent Media
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)