It's
Not Just Syria—Trump Is Ratcheting Up Wars
Across the World
From Yemen to Somalia to North Korea, the
president is putting the planet on a crash
course with catastrophe.
By Trevor Timm
April 17,
2017 "Information
Clearing House"
- "The
Guardian"-
Donald Trump’s
missile strikes on Syria have attracted
worldwide attention (and disgraceful
plaudits) in
recent days. But much less airtime is being
given to his administration’s risky and
increasingly barbaric military escalations on
several other fronts across the world.
Let’s put aside, for the time being, that the
Trump administration openly admits it has no
clue what it is going to do in Syria next. Or
that key members
of Congress and in
the administration are
clearly eager for “regime change” in Syria with
no plan for the aftermath. And the fact that
hardly anyone seems to care that Russia’s former
president Dmitry Medvedev said
over the weekend that
Syrian strikes put the US “on the verge of a
military clash with Russia” – a nuclear power
with thousands of warheads.
As troubling as these developments are, we
should be just as concerned about the explosion
of civilian deaths – more
than 1,000 in
March alone – that have come directly as the
result of the Trump administration’s other
reckless military campaigns across the Middle
East over the past few weeks.
Recently, US airstrikes have claimed the lives
of 200
civilians in Iraq, dozens
were killed in separate strikes supposedly
aimed at Islamic State in Syria and several
more women and children died
in a raid gone awry in Yemen. Those are just a
few examples of the many attacks – launched
under the pretext of defeating Isis – that
wreaked havoc on civilian populations as the US
military ramps up its bombing campaigns in
multiple counties.
At the same time, the Trump administration has
been expanding official US “war zones” in Somalia and
Yemen, while working to “make it easier for the
Pentagon to launch counterterrorism strikes
anywhere in the world” and loosening
restrictions on preventing civilian deaths that
were put in place by the Obama administration,
as the Washington Post reported
a few weeks ago.
Drone strikes, already accelerated under the
Obama administration, have increased even more
under Trump. Micah Zenko, who tracks the numbers
at the Council on Foreign Relations, noted in
March that Trump was
carrying out a
drone strike every 1.8 days, compared to every
5.4 days under Obama.
On the other side of the world, the Trump
administration is
responding to North Korea’s nuclear program with
even more saber rattling, sending in US ships
over the weekend to the region as some vague
“show of force”.
This comes just as NBC
News reported,
“the National Security Council has presented
President Donald Trump with options to respond
to North Korea’s nuclear program – including
putting American nukes in South Korea or killing
dictator Kim Jong-un”. Pressure is mounting from
the outside too, as the Wall Street Journal’s
right wing neocon-in-residence Brett Stephens
loudly called
for“regime
change” in North Korea two weeks ago.
And then there’s Iran, which the Weekly
Standard’s Bill Kristol is
once again saying is the ultimate “prize” for
regime change, now that Trump is directly
bombing Assad’s forces.
Weeks ago, Trump’s defense secretary James
Mattis was reportedly planning a brazen and
incredibly dangerous operation to board Iranian
ships in international waters. This would have
effectively been an act of war. Apparently, the
only reason the Trump administration didn’t
carry it out was because
the plan leakedand
they were forced to scuttle it – at least
temporarily. But that hasn’t stopped the
ratcheting up of tensions towards Iran ever
since he took office.
No
Advertising - No Government Grants - This Is
Independent Media
On top of all this madness, 16 years after
America’s longest war in history started, a
top general has already testified to
Congress that the military wants more troops in
Afghanistan to break the “stalemate” there. Well
before the end of the Trump administration,
there will be troops fighting and dying in
Afghanistan who weren’t even born when the 9/11
attacks occurred.
To further shield the public from these
decisions, the Trump administration indicated
a couple weeks ago they have stopped disclosing even
the amount of additional troops that they are
sending overseas to fight. The numbers were
already being downplayed by the Obama
administration and received little attention as
the numbers continually creeped up over the last
two years. Now, the public will have virtually
no insight into what its military is doing in
those countries.
It should go without saying that Bashar al-Assad
is a monster and a butcher and the people of Syria have
suffered incredibly over the past five years.
North Korea is potentially dangerous and
unpredictable, and Iran is far from innocent on
the world stage. But the idea that starting or
expanding wars against these countries is going
to solve anything belies the last 15 years of
history, where the US has intervened and
overthrown leaders in country after country,
only to cause even more chaos and destruction,
with trillions of dollars and millions of lives
lost.
With
several conflicts likely brewing with countries
that have significant military power, the Trump
administration is putting the US – and the world
– on a potentially catastrophic collision
course. And so far, pushback from politicians,
the media and anyone else with influence in
Washington has barely been seen.
Trevor Timm is executive
director of the Freedom
of the Press Foundation,
a non-profit organization that supports
and defends journalism dedicated to
transparency and accountability. You can
follow him on Twitter at@TrevorTimm.
The
views expressed in this article are solely those
of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
opinions of Information Clearing House.
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)