This Is
What’s Really Behind North Korea’s Nuclear
Provocations
It’s easy to dismiss Kim Jong-un as a madman.
But there’s a long history of US aggression
against the North, which we forget at our peril.
By Bruce Cumings
April
15/16, 2017 "Information
Clearing House"
- "The
Nation"-
Donald
Trump was having dinner at Mar-a-Lago with
Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe on February
11 when a message arrived mid-meal, courtesy of
Pyongyang: North Korea had just tested a new,
solid-fuel, intermediate-range ballistic
missile, fired from a mobile—and therefore
hard-to-detect—launcher. The president pulled
out his 1990s flip-phone and discussed this
event in front of the various people sitting
within earshot. One of these diners, Richard
DeAgazio, was suitably agog at the import of
this weighty scene, posting the following
comment on his Facebook page: “HOLY MOLY!!! It
was fascinating to watch the flurry of activity
at dinner when the news came that North Korea
had launched a missile in the direction of
Japan.”
Actually, this missile was aimed directly at
Mar-a-Lago, figuratively speaking. It was a
pointed nod to history that no American media
outlet grasped: “Prime Minister Shinzo,” as
Trump called him, is the grandson of Nobusuke
Kishi, a former Japanese prime minister whom Abe
reveres. Nobusuke was deemed a “Class A” war
criminal by the US occupation authorities after
World War II, and he ran munitions manufacturing
in Manchuria in the 1930s, when Gen. Hideki Tojo
was provost marshal there. Kim Il-sung, whom
grandson Kim Jong-un likewise reveres, was
fighting the Japanese at the same time and in
the same place.
As I wrote for
this magazine in January 2016,
the North Koreans must be astonished to discover
that US leaders never seem to grasp the import
of their history-related provocations. Even more
infuriating is Washington’s implacable refusal
ever to investigate our 72-year history of
conflict with the North; all of our media appear
to live in an eternal present, with each new
crisis treated as sui generis. Visiting Seoul in
March, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson asserted
that North Korea has a history of violating one
agreement after another; in fact, President Bill
Clinton got it to freeze its plutonium
production for eight years (1994–2002) and, in
October 2000, had indirectly worked out a deal
to buy all of its medium- and long-range
missiles. Clinton also signed an agreement with
Gen. Jo Myong-rok stating that henceforth,
neither country would bear “hostile intent”
toward the other.
The
Bush administration promptly ignored both
agreements and set out to destroy the 1994
freeze. Bush’s invasion of Iraq is rightly seen
as a world-historical catastrophe, but next in
line would be placing North Korea in his “axis
of evil” and, in September 2002, announcing his
“preemptive” doctrine directed at Iraq and North
Korea, among others. The simple fact is that
Pyongyang would have no nuclear weapons if
Clinton’s agreements had been sustained.
Now
comes Donald Trump, blasting into a Beltway
milieu where, in recent months, a bipartisan
consensus has emerged based on the false
assumption that all previous attempts to rein in
the North’s nuclear program have failed, so it
may be time to use force—to destroy its missiles
or topple the regime. Last September, the
centrist Council on Foreign Relations issued a
report stating that “more assertive military and
political actions” should be considered,
“including those that directly threaten the
existence of the [North Korean] regime.”
Tillerson warned of preemptive action on his
recent East Asia trip, and a former Obama-administration
official, Antony Blinken, wrote in The New
York Times that a “priority” for the Trump
administration should be working with China and
South Korea to “secure the North’s nuclear
arsenal” in the event of “regime change.” But
North Korea reportedly has some 15,000
underground facilities of a national-security
nature. It is insane to imagine the Marines
traipsing around the country in such a “search
and secure” operation, and yet the Bush and
Obama administrations had plans to do just that.
Obama also ran a highly secret cyber-war against
the North for years, seeking to infect and
disrupt its missile program. If North Korea did
that to us, it might well be considered an act
of war.
No
Advertising - No Government Grants - This Is Independent Media
|
On
November 8, 2016, nearly 66 million voters for
Hillary Clinton received a lesson in Hegel’s
“cunning of history.” A bigger lesson awaits
Donald Trump, should he attack North Korea. It
has the fourth-largest army in the world, as
many as 200,000 highly trained special forces,
10,000 artillery pieces in the mountains north
of Seoul, mobile missiles that can hit all
American military bases in the region (there are
hundreds), and nuclear weapons more than twice
as powerful as the Hiroshima bomb (according to
a new estimate in a highly detailed Times
study by David Sanger and William Broad).
Last
October, I was at a forum in Seoul with Strobe
Talbott, a former deputy secretary of state for
Bill Clinton. Like everyone else, Talbott
averred that North Korea might well be the top
security problem for the next president. In my
remarks, I mentioned Robert McNamara’s
explanation, in Errol Morris’s excellent
documentary
The Fog of War,
for our defeat in Vietnam: We never put
ourselves in the shoes of the enemy and
attempted to see the world as they did. Talbott
then blurted, “It’s a grotesque regime!” There
you have it: It’s our number-one problem, but so
grotesque that there’s no point trying to
understand Pyongyang’s point of view (or even
that it might have some valid concerns). North
Korea is the only country in the world to have
been systematically blackmailed by US nuclear
weapons going back to the 1950s, when hundreds
of nukes were installed in South Korea. I have
written much about this in these pages and in
the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.
Why on earth would Pyongyang not seek a
nuclear deterrent? But this crucial background
doesn’t enter mainstream American discourse.
History doesn’t matter, until it does—when it
rears up and smacks you in the face.
The
views expressed in this article are solely those
of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
opinions of Information Clearing House.
A
Government of
Morons
By Paul Craig
Roberts |
|
Western
Civilization, if
civilization it
is, is the
greatest
committer of war
crimes in human
history. -
Continue |
=========
=========
=========
=========
=========
=========
=========
=========
=========
=========
=========
=========
|