Exaggerated Dangers in Venezuela
By Luis
Beaton
April 11, 2017 "Information
Clearing House"
- "Prensa
Latina"
-
Caracas, Apr 10 Exaggerating the dangers
that exist today in Venezuela seems to be
part of the strategy to root the image of
insecurity in order to justify a foreign
intervention that will allegedly save the
country''s stability.
How
true or false is the situation they are
trying to sell to the large masses who are
alarmingly observing the manipulated
domestic situation, as part of a scenario
that has been described as catastrophic by
people like the secretary-general of the
Organization of American States (OAS), Luis
Almagro?
A communiqué issued by Almagro refers to 'a
killed demonstrator and dozens of wounded
and arrested as the initial result of
repression (on Friday), aimed at suffocating
the demand for free elections, the only
solution for a country devastated by the
political crisis and looting.'
The peaceful protest and the right to the
freedom of peaceful association, he noted,
are universal rights that any government,
especially the democratic governments, must
respect. That shows again that there is no
democracy in Venezuela and that human rights
are violated regularly, the OAS chief said.
None of this fits reality. First, there is
freedom to demonstrate, but authorities have
the right to limit the places to prevent
clashes between opposite forces, according
to observers.
The violent demonstrations, according to
what this correspondent has observed, are
promoted by groups opposed to the government
that are closely linked to 'the democrats of
the continent', as Almagro calls those who
'will not accept to pay with Venezuelan
blood the debts of democracy, freedoms,
prosperity, the Constitution and the rights
that its rulers have contracted at the
people's expense,' something that these
advocates cause and manipulate.
The communiqué, which was issued after
Almagro met on Thursday in Washington with
the speaker of the Venezuelan National
Assembly, the opposition leader Julio
Borges, shows that the so-called soft coup
against President Nicolas Maduro is being
cooked in the U.S. capital, with support
from local opponents.
Big media organizations have described
events that do not match reality, as they
are trying to depict an explosive image
throughout the country.
For example, here, at the foot of Mountain
Avila, there were sporadic expressions of
violence in the areas of Altamira and
Chacaito, known as the capital's bastions of
the country's right-wing opposition and the
bourgeoisie, while in other zones in the
east, west and south, there is tension, but
there is no violence as predicted and
announced by media opposed to the
government.
That atmosphere of insecurity and violence
is fueled by events like this one:
'Venezuelan tennis players had to go to
Miami to compete in the Davis Cup against El
Salvador. Not a single game will take place
in Venezuela, because the International
Federation considered that it was dangerous.
But no one, either the International Tennis
Federation or the IND or Min-Deportes say
anything', the commentator Eleazar Diaz
Rangel said.
Logically, the manipulation of the situation
contributes to the atmosphere of insecurity.
Everything can have an interpretation here.
For example, at 08:00 hours, local time, on
Sunday, a squad of soldiers wearing the
olive green uniforms of the Bolivarian
National Armed Force (FANB) was deployed at
the steps of the Financiero Latino building,
in Urdaneta and Avenida Fuerzas Armadas.
Anyone would think that it was a scenario of
violence, because the headquarters of the
Ombudsman is located nearby, but it was
merely a preventive exercise. The danger
does not exist.
No
Advertising - No Government Grants - This Is Independent Media
|
It
does not mean that the country is not in
tension, there is tension, ordinary people
are concerned about their country and the
threats coming from abroad, but so far, it
has not gone beyond that, unless foreign
forces attack the homeland of Simon Bolivar
and Hugo Chavez. Then, there will be a
dangerous situation.
However, there are still voices like that of
UNASUR Secretary-General Ernesto Samper, who
noted that an explicit electoral program is
the best way to solve the political crisis.
It was said by someone who participated in
the talks between the two parties and who
has promoted dialogue.
Likewise, but on the opposite direction,
there is howling like that by Argentine
President Mauricio Macri, who speaks about
'violations of human rights' in Venezuela
and calls 'to exert pressure' to cause the
explosion of a bomb that can affect the
entire Latin America.
In that regard, the interpretation of the
dangers may change, everything depends on
being at the wrong moment and at the wrong
time in the sequence of a situation.
Copyright ©
2016
Agencia Informativa Latinoamericana Prensa
Latina