The
Surveillance State Behind Russia-gate
Amid the frenzy over the Trump team’s talks with
Russians, are we missing a darker story, how the
Deep State’s surveillance powers control the
nation’s leaders, ask U.S. intelligence veterans
Ray McGovern and Bill Binney.
By Ray McGovern and Bill Binney
March 28, 2017 "Information
Clearing House"
- "Consortium
News"
- Although many details are still hazy because
of secrecy – and further befogged by politics –
it appears House Intelligence Committee Chairman
Devin Nunes was informed last week about
invasive electronic surveillance of senior U.S.
government officials and, in turn, passed that
information onto President Trump.
This news
presents Trump with an unwelcome but unavoidable
choice: confront those who have kept him in the
dark about such rogue activities or live
fearfully in their shadow. (The latter was the
path chosen by President Obama. Will Trump
choose the road less traveled?)
What
President Trump decides will largely determine
the freedom of action he enjoys as president on
many key security and other issues. But even
more so, his choice may decide whether there is
a future for this constitutional republic.
Either he can acquiesce to or fight against a
Deep State of intelligence officials who have a
myriad of ways to spy on politicians (and other
citizens) and thus amass derogatory material
that can be easily transformed into blackmail.
This
crisis (yes, “crisis” is an overused word, but
in this highly unusual set of circumstances we
believe it is appropriate) came to light mostly
by accident after President Trump tweeted on
March 4 that his team in New York City’s Trump
Towers had been “wiretapped” by President Obama.
Trump
reportedly was relying on media reports
regarding how conversations of aides, including
his ill-starred National Security Advisor
Michael Flynn, had been intercepted. Trump’s
tweet led to a fresh offensive by Democrats and
the mainstream press to disparage Trump’s
“ridiculous” claims.
However, this concern about the dragnets that
U.S. intelligence (or its foreign partners) can
deploy to pick up communications by Trump’s
advisers and then “unmask” the names before
leaking them to the news media was also
highlighted at the Nunes-led House Intelligence
Committee hearing on March 20, where Nunes
appealed for anyone who had related knowledge to
come forward with it.
That
apparently happened on the evening of March 21
when Nunes received a call while riding with a
staffer. After the call, Nunes switched to
another car and went to a secure room at the Old
Executive Office Building, next to the White
House, where he was shown highly classified
information apparently about how the
intelligence community picked up communications
by Trump’s aides.
The
next day, Nunes went to the White House to brief
President Trump, who later said he felt
“somewhat vindicated” by what Nunes had told
him.
The
‘Wiretap’ Red Herring
But the
corporate U.S. news media continued to heckle
Trump over his use of the word “wiretap” and
cite the insistence of FBI Director James Comey
and other intelligence officials that President
Obama had not issued a wiretap order aimed at
Trump.
As
those paying rudimentary attention to modern
methods of surveillance know, “wiretapping” is
passé. But Trump’s use of the word allowed FBI
and Department of Justice officials and their
counterparts at the National Security Agency to
swear on a stack of bibles that the FBI, DOJ,
and NSA have been unable to uncover any evidence
within their particular institutions of such
“wiretapping.”
At the
House Intelligence Committee hearing on March
20, FBI Director Comey and NSA Director Michael
Rogers firmly denied that their agencies had
wiretapped Trump Towers on the orders of
President Obama.
So,
were Trump and his associates “wiretapped?” Of
course not. Wiretapping went out of vogue
decades ago, having been rendered obsolete by
leaps in surveillance technology.
The
real question is: Were Trump and his associates
surveilled? Wake up, America. Was no one paying
attention to the disclosures from NSA
whistleblower Edward Snowden in 2013 when he
exposed Director of National Intelligence James
Clapper as a liar for denying that the NSA
engaged in bulk collection of communications
inside the United States.
The
reality is that EVERYONE, including the
President, is surveilled. The technology
enabling bulk collection would have made the
late demented FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover’s
mouth water.
Allegations about the intelligence community’s
abuse of its powers also did not begin with
Snowden. For instance, several years earlier,
former NSA worker and whistleblower Russell Tice
warned about these “special access programs,”
citing first-hand knowledge, but his claims were
brushed aside as coming from a disgruntled
employee with psychological problems. His
disclosures were soon forgotten.
Intelligence Community’s Payback
However, earlier this year, there was a stark
reminder of how much fear these surveillance
capacities have struck in the hearts of senior
U.S. government officials. Senate Minority
Leader Chuck Schumer of New York told
MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow that President Trump was
“being really dumb” to take on the intelligence
community, since “They have six ways from Sunday
at getting back at you.”
No
Advertising - No Government Grants - This Is Independent Media
|
Maddow
shied away from asking the logical follow-up:
“Senator Schumer, are you actually saying that
Trump should be afraid of the CIA?” Perhaps she
didn’t want to venture down a path that would
raise more troubling questions about the
surveillance of the Trump team than on their
alleged contacts with the Russians.
Similarly, the U.S. corporate media is now
focused on Nunes’s alleged failure to follow
protocol by not sharing his information first
with Rep. Adam Schiff, the ranking Democrat on
the House Intelligence Committee. Democrats
promptly demanded that Nunes recuse himself from
the Russia investigation.
On
Tuesday morning, reporters for CNN and other
news outlets peppered Nunes with similar demands
as he walked down a corridor on Capitol Hill,
prompting him to suggest that they should be
more concerned about what he had learned than
the procedures followed.
That’s
probably true because to quote Jack Nicholson’s
character in “A Few Good Men” in a slightly
different context, the mainstream media “cannot
handle the truth” – even if it’s a no-brainer.
At his
evening meeting on March 21 at the Old Executive
Office Building, Nunes was likely informed that
all telephones, emails, etc. – including his own
and Trump’s – are being monitored by what the
Soviets used to call “the organs of state
security.”
By
sharing that information with Trump the next day
– rather than consulting with Schiff – Nunes may
have sought to avoid the risk that Schiff or
someone else would come up with a bureaucratic
reason to keep the President in the dark.
A savvy
politician, Nunes knew there would be high
political cost in doing what he did. Inevitably,
he would be called partisan; there would be more
appeals to remove him from chairing the
committee; and the character assassination of
him already well under way – in The Washington
Post, for example – might move him to the top of
the unpopularity chart, displacing even bête
noire Russian President Vladimir Putin.
But
this episode was not the first time Nunes has
shown some spine in the face of what the
Establishment wants ignored. In a move setting
this congressman apart from all his colleagues,
Nunes had the courage to host an award ceremony
for one of his constituents, retired sailor and
member of the USS Liberty crew, Terry Halbardier.
On June
8, 1967, by repairing an antennae and thus
enabling the USS Liberty to issue an SOS,
Halbardier prevented Israeli aircraft and
torpedo boats from sinking that Navy
intelligence ship and ensuring that there would
be no survivors to describe how the Israeli
“allies” had strafed and bombed the ship. Still,
34 American seamen died and 171 were wounded.
At the time of the award ceremony in 2009, Nunes
said, “The government has kept this quiet I
think for too long, and I felt as my
constituent, he [Halbardier] needed to get
recognized for the services he made to his
country.” (Ray McGovern
took part in the ceremony
in Nunes’s Visalia, California office.)
Now, we
suspect that much more may be learned about the
special compartmented surveillance program
targeted against top U.S. national leaders if
Rep. Nunes doesn’t back down and if Trump
doesn’t choose the road most traveled –
acquiescence to America’s Deep State actors.
Ray
McGovern served as a CIA analyst for 27 years
and conducted one-on-one briefings of the
President’s Daily Brief under Ronald Reagan from
1081 to 1985.
Bill
Binney was former Technical Director, World
Geopolitical & Military Analysis, NSA and
co-founder of NSA’s SIGINT Automation Research
Center before he retired after 9/11.
The
views expressed in this article are solely those
of the author and do not necessarily reflect the
opinions of Information Clearing House.