By
James Bamford
March 22, 2017 "Information
Clearing House"
- On a heavily protected
military base some 15 miles
south of Washington, D.C., sits
the massive headquarters of a
spy agency few know exists. Even
Barack Obama, five months into
his presidency, seemed not to
have recognized its name. While
shaking hands at a Five Guys
hamburger restaurant in
Washington in May 2009, he asked
a customer seated at a table
about his job. “What do you
[do]?” the president inquired.
“I work at NGA, National
Geospatial-Intelligence Agency,”
the man answered. Obama appeared
dumbfounded. “So, explain to me
exactly what this National
Geospatial…” he said, unable to
finish the name. Eight years
after that videotape aired, the
NGA remains by far the most
shadowy member of the Big Five
spy agencies, which include the
CIA and the National Security
Agency.
Despite its lack of name
recognition, the NGA’s
headquarters is the
third-largest building in the
Washington metropolitan area,
bigger than the CIA headquarters
and the U.S. Capitol.
Completed in 2011 at a cost of
$1.4 billion, the main building
measures four football fields
long and covers as much ground
as two aircraft carriers. In
2016, the agency purchased 99
acres in St. Louis to construct
additional buildings at a cost
of $1.75 billion to accommodate
the growing workforce, with
3,000 employees already in the
city.
The NGA is to pictures what the
NSA is to voices. Its principal
function is to analyze the
billions of images and miles of
video captured by drones in the
Middle East and spy satellites
circling the globe. But because
it has largely kept its
ultra-high-resolution cameras
pointed away from the United
States, according to a variety
of studies, the agency has never
been involved in domestic spy
scandals like its two far more
famous siblings, the CIA and the
NSA. However, there’s reason to
believe that this will change
under President Donald Trump.
Throughout the long election
campaign and into his first
months as president, Trump has
pushed hard for weakening
restraints on the intelligence
agencies, spending more money
for defense, and getting tough
on law and order. Given the new
president’s overwhelming focus
on domestic security, it’s
reasonable to expect that Trump
will use every tool available to
maintain it, including overhead
vigilance.
In
March 2016, the Pentagon
released
the results of an investigation
initiated by the Department of
Defense’s Office of Inspector
General to examine military spy
drones in the United States. The
report, marked “For Official Use
Only” and partially redacted,
revealed that the Pentagon used
unarmed surveillance drones over
American soil on fewer than 20
occasions between 2006 and 2015.
(Although the report doesn’t
identify the nature of the
missions, another Pentagon
document
lists
11 domestic drone operations
that principally involved
natural disasters, search and
rescue, and National Guard
training.)
The
investigation also quoted from
an Air Force law review
article
pointing out the growing concern
that technology designed to spy
on enemies abroad may soon be
turned around to spy on citizens
at home. “As the nation winds
down these wars … assets become
available to support other
combatant command (COCOM) or
U.S. agencies, the appetite to
use them in the domestic
environment to collect airborne
imagery continues to grow.”
Although the report
stated
that all missions were conducted
within full compliance of the
law, it pointedly noted that as
of 2015 there were no
standardized federal statutes
that “specifically address the
employment of the capability
provided by a DoD UAS (unmanned
aircraft system) if requested by
domestic civil authorities.”
Instead, there is a Pentagon
policy governing reconnaissance
drones that requires the
secretary of defense to approve
all such domestic operations.
Under these regulations, drones
“may not conduct surveillance on
U.S. persons” unless permitted
by law and approved by the
secretary. The policy also bans
armed drones over the United
States for anything other than
military training and weapons
testing.
No
Advertising - No Government Grants - This Is Independent Media
|
In
2016, unbeknownst to many city
officials, police in Baltimore
began
conducting
persistent aerial surveillance
using a system developed for
military use in Iraq.
Few civilians have any idea how
advanced these military
eye-in-the-sky drones have
become. Among them is
ARGUS-IS, the world’s
highest-resolution camera with
1.8 billion pixels. Invisible
from the ground at nearly four
miles in the air, it uses a
technology known as “persistent
stare” — the equivalent of 100
Predator drones peering down at
a medium-size city at once — to
track everything that moves.
With the capability to watch an
area of 10 or even 15 square
miles at a time, it would take
just two drones hovering over
Manhattan to continuously
observe and follow all outdoor
human activity, night and day.
It can zoom in on an object as
small as a stick of butter on a
plate and store up to 1 million
terabytes of data a day. That
capacity would allow analysts to
look back in time over days,
weeks, or months. Technology is
in the works to enable drones to
remain aloft for years at a
time.
The
Department of Homeland Security
has been at these crossroads
before. In 2007, during the
presidency of George W. Bush,
the department
established
an agency to direct domestic spy
satellite stakeouts and gave it
a bland name: the National
Applications Office. But
Congress, concerned about a “Big
Brother in the Sky,” cut off
funding. In 2009, it was killed
by the Obama administration.
Still, unlike domestic
electronic surveillance by the
NSA, which has been closely
scrutinized and subjected to
legislation designed to protect
civil liberties, domestic
overhead spying has escaped the
attention of both Congress and
the public. The Trump
administration may take
advantage of that void.
Initiating a new age of
“persistent surveillance,” Trump
could use the spy world’s
overhead assets to target
Muslims or members of Black
Lives Matter. The president has
spoken in favor of increasing
the scrutiny of mosques; aerial
assessment would allow him to
track worshippers. Drones could
aid in the mass roundup of
illegal immigrants intended for
deportation, and Trump has said
he may send federal forces to
Chicago to quell the violence.
Drones could offer the city the
unblinking eye for 24/7
vigilance.
Of course, all that would
require a significant expansion
of the National
Geospatial-Intelligence Agency
to analyze the domestic imagery.
Before that can happen, Trump,
like Obama, has to discover
there is such an agency.
A version of
this article originally appeared
in the March/April 2017 issue of
FP magazine.