You’ve recently banned foreigners
who support boycotts against Israel or
Israeli settlements from being allowed
to enter Israel – even Jewish
foreigners, a first for the
self-proclaimed Jewish state After all,
your “Law
of Return” has allowed (and
encouraged) Jewish foreigners to freely
immigrate to Israel, even as multitudes
of Palestinians have
been banned from returning to their
homes.
People throughout the Western world
have objected in
outrage to your new law, particularly
Jewish Westerners who have family and
connections in Israel from whom they’ll
be cut off in retaliation for their
political positions.
Critics, even some who oppose
boycotting Israel and who have had no
problem with excluding Palestinians,
have called out the law for diverse
reasons: its quashing of free debate and
political expression, its
anti-democratic nature, how it will
affect them and others personally.
I support these objections.
But I’m not trying to visit Israel.
I want to go to Bethlehem and Nablus,
Ramallah and Hebron, Jenin and Tulkarem.
I hope to return to Khan Yunis, Rafah,
Gaza City, and numerous other towns and
villages in the West Bank and Gaza.
In other words, I want to go to
Palestine – a country recognized by 136
countries around the world. But your
law, astoundingly, prevents me from
visiting that country. You control entry
and exit to the places I want to visit,
even though they’re not part of your
territory, or included in your exclusive
democracy.
When I was born, Palestine referred
to the whole of the land that
your founders then ethnically cleansed
and renamed. Now, it officially refers
to a few segments of land, surrounded
and trapped.
Unlike the residents of every other
country on earth, Palestinians are not
free to travel to and from their own
country unless a foreign country gives
them permission – a normally universal
right that you routinely deny: to young
and old, Muslims and Christians,
professors and paupers, men and women.
Visitors are similarly obstructed.
You decide whether they can get in, and
whether they can get out.
When I try to visit Bethlehem, for
example, I must face your armed soldiers
manning the Kafkaesque, towering
concrete wall you have erected on
Palestinian land. These gun-toting
youngsters will decree whether or not I
and others – including Palestinian
descendants of Bethlehem’s ancient
shepherds – can pass through.
In other words, Israel is essentially
imprisoning over 4 million men, women,
and children (with some help from Egypt,
its proxy to the south). Israeli
jailers, euphemistically “border
guards,” determine who may even visit
this incarcerated population, and what
supplies may reach them.
Over the years I’ve seen you prevent
numerous individuals and groups, many
bringing medicines and life-saving
supplies, from visiting this captive
population. You’ve blocked sons from
visiting dying mothers, suffering
children from receiving critical medical
care, malnourished toddlers from
receiving help.
No
Advertising - No Government Grants - This Is Independent Media
It is a profound shame upon the world
that this cruel and unconscionable
condition has been permitted to persist
year after year. There should have been
massive and irresistible objections long
before your recent legislation.
I remember when the United States
opposed the Iron Curtain. Today, the
U.S. gives the perpetrator of this
current captivity $10 million per day.
Israel already denied me entry once
15 years ago, locking me up for 28 hours
in a detention cell in Ben Gurion
Airport before expelling me. I remember
Israeli officials telling me I was not
“allowed into Israel.” They didn’t even
supply a reason.
Next time, they may say it’s because
I endorse BDS, which I wholeheartedly
do.
But I’m not trying to go to Israel. I
want to go to Palestine.
It is unacceptable to slander, smear or engage in personal attacks on authors of articles posted on ICH.
Those engaging in that behavior will be banned from the comment section.
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)