Oh, That
Traitorous WikiTrump
Nothing so trivial as the technical proof we’re all
being spied upon can be allowed to threaten or add
nuance to established narrative
By Pepe Escobar
March 09, 2017
"Information
Clearing House"
- "Asia
Times"
-
The massive
WikiLeaks Vault
7 release is an
extremely important public service. It’s hard to
find anyone not concerned by a secret CIA hacking
program targeting virtually the whole planet – using
malware capable of bypassing encryption protection
on any device from iOS to Android, and from Windows
to Samsung TVs.
In a
series of
tweets,
Edward Snowden confirmed the CIA program and said
code names in the documents are real; that they
could only be known by a “cleared insider;” the FBI
and CIA knew all about the digital loopholes, but
kept them open to spy; and that the leaks provided
the “first public evidence” that the US government
secretly paid to keep US software unsafe.
If that’s
not serious enough, WikiLeaks alleges that “the CIA
has lost control of the majority of its hacking
arsenal;” several hundred million lines of code —
more than what is used to run Facebook.
Someone
among the former US government hackers and
contractors ended up leaking portions of the CIA
archive (Snowden II?). WikiLeaks also stressed how
the CIA had created, in effect, its “own NSA” –
maximum unaccountability included.
Even though
millions already knew – without the technical
details – that they were being spied upon by their
iPhone or their 4K Samsung, the Vault 7 revelations
are far more relevant – and practical – to the
average citizen than the 24/7 hysteria fingering
President Trump as a Putin puppet. Intel sources are
volunteering the – still unexplored – Vault 7
treasure trove is more crucial than what Snowden
himself revealed.
And still,
vast corporate media sectors embedded with the
neocon/neoliberal galaxy are spinning that Vault 7
benefits Trump by changing the subject from alleged
Russian hacking interference in the US elections and
possible Obama administration-ordered hacks of Team
Trump’s communications.
So, if
anyone hasn’t got the message, the song remains the
same.
WikiLeaks + Snowden + Russia + Trump = the bad guys.
CIA deploying its own NSA around the world = the
good guys. After all, CIA spokesman Jonathan Liu
duly issued a non-denial denial.
Break
Free From The Matrix
|
Loony
mainstream factions are even advancing that “the
Russians” leaked the CIA info to WikiLeaks, thus
fueling more suspicion that Russia will interfere in
upcoming French and German elections.
May I have an Orwellian iPhone,
please?
As
we’re mired deep in an Orwellian total screen
environment, already conceptualized by
Baudrillard in the
go-go 1980s, nothing so trivial as the technical
proof we’re all being spied upon could alter the (im)balance.
The US is already ravaged by a vicious
sociopolitical war – and no “threat” to established
narratives allows for nuance.
The
implication is that, as it stands, there won’t be a
US-Russia reset anytime soon – despite hosting
invitations from Iceland, Finland or Slovenia; the
neocon/neoliberal galaxy nestled in powerful deep
state factions will do their best to deny it.
It hardly
matters that Trump absolutely does not want war: his
entire domestic US economy remix could not possibly
allow it. The Pentagon now is essentially an
extended special ops unit: it cannot possibly fight
a land war (Iran? North Korea? Ukraine?)
Russia, on
the other hand, would be ready for war if needs be.
The S-500 missile defense system is being deployed:
some analysts (not the Ministry of Defense) are sure
it’s already protecting the whole Russian landmass.
China, by 2021, will have more than 1,000 very
mobile warheads, or hidden in those submarines
lounging in Hainan. By that time, both Iran and
Pakistan will be deep into a strategic defense
network with Russia-China, via the Shanghai
Cooperation Organization, shielded with their
own S-400 and S-500 systems.
Putin is
not playing chess. He’s playing Go — and if we look
at the board, reality is indeed painful.
Moscow is
all but deciding the practical future of Syria, in
Astana. Russia virtually wrote the Minsk II
agreements, routinely broken by Kiev. Crimea as part
of Russia is a fait accompli. Novorossiya for all
practical purposes is already a totally autonomous
region, with the economy working in rubles. Erdogan
owes his imminent regime change in reverse – a
presidential sultanate? – to Putin, as Russia warned
him about the military coup hours in advance,
according to several Russian media sources. Moscow
protected Iran’s energy industry during the hardcore
OPEC negotiations. Putin all but designed the
Russia-China strategic partnership.
Beijing has
managed to convince Moscow that One Belt, One Road
and the Eurasia Economic Union should be connected,
merged and tackled as a win-win Eurasia integration
process. If Russia eventually loses economic
preeminence across the Central Asian “stans,” it
maintains its paramount military/security status.
Russian Foreign Minister
Sergei Lavrov never
ceases to stress that “our relations with China are
at their best level ever in our two countries’
history.”
Add to it a
geo-economic gambit; hints of key factions of
European business elites getting ready to hitch
themselves to China’s growing – slowly but surely –
monetary/financial clout, linked to Beijing’s
imperative of preventing a collapse of global supply
chains. Xi Jinping’s “inclusive globalization,”
announced in Davos, sounds more and more like a
reality in the making.
In
contrast to reality, where China-Russia expand their
strategies without exceptionalist illusions, 24/7
neocon/neoliberal hysteria offers a
constant barrage of
childish, pathetic eruptions. As the self-delusion
school of foreign policy refuses to admit Moscow
will not sell out China and Iran for a deal with
Washington, the last refuge of the scoundrels is
cognitive dissonance; fear of Russia incited to cold
war 2.0 heights.
So, relax,
global citizen; the CIA is benign and benevolent,
even when they’re watching you. You have nothing to
fear but fear itself – and its name is Russia.
The
views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect the opinions of Information Clearing
House.
|