Only the
Israeli Dead Matter: Israel’s Failure at
Investigating Its Bloody Wars
By Ramzy
Baroud
March 09,
2017 "Information
Clearing House"
-
At a glance, Israel
appears a true democracy. Take a closer look and
that
facade of democracy
will soon dissipate, turning into something else
entirely.
Tuesday 28
February was one of those moments. The chain of
events was as follows:
An
official Israeli State Comptroller
issued another report
on the Israeli government’s handling of the July
2014 war on Gaza; it
chastised Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
and then-Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon – among
others – for the lack of preparedness and for their
mishandling of the subsequent 51-day conflict;
Netanyahu reacted angrily; Ya’alon took to Facebook
to defend his record; the opposition in the Israeli
Knesset went on the offensive; politicians lined up,
taking sides; a media frenzy followed; the country
was in an uproar.
This is not
a precedent. It is a repeat of a recurring scenario
that often follows Israel’s military plunders. When
such reports are issued, Israelis sort out their
differences in fierce parliamentary and media
battles.
While
Israelis begin to examine their failures, demanding
accountability from their government, western
mainstream media finds the perfect opportunity to
whitewash its own record of failing to criticize
Israel’s military onslaught at the time.
(Over
2,200 – of whom over 70 per cent were Palestinian
civilians – were killed and thousands more wounded
in Israel’s so-called “Operation
Protective Edge” in
2014.)
According
to US media logic, for example, Israel’s
investigation of its own action is a tribute to its
thriving democracy, often juxtaposed with Arab
governments’ lack of self-examination.
When Israel
invaded Lebanon in 1982, instigating a war that
resulted in the deaths of tens of thousands of
Lebanese and Palestinians, culminating in the Sabra
and Shatilla Massacres, a familiar scenario ensued:
The United States did its utmost to prevent any
international intervention or meaningful
investigation, while Israel was allowed to
investigate itself.
The
outcome was the Kahan Commission Report, the
conclusion of which
was summarized by
international law expert Professor Richard Falk:
“The full measure of Israel’s victory is rather its
vindication, despite all, as a moral force in the
region – as a superior state, especially as compared
to its Arab rivals.”
The US
media touted Israel’s “moral victory”, which,
somehow, made everything okay and, with a magic
wand, wiped the record clean.
The
Washington Post editorial
led the congratulatory chorus:
“The whole process of the Israeli reaction to the
Beirut massacre is a tribute to the vitality of
democracy in Israel and to the country’s moral
character.”
Break
Free From The Matrix
|
This sorry
state of affairs has been in constant replay for
nearly 70 years, ever since Israel declared its
independence in 1948.
International law is clear regarding the legal
responsibility of Occupying Powers but since Israel
is rarely an enthusiast of international law, it has
forbidden any attempt at being investigated for its
actions.
In
fact, Israel abhors the very idea of being
“investigated”. Every attempt by the United Nations,
or any other organization dedicated to upholding
international law,
has either been rejected
or failed.
By Israeli
logic, Israel is a democracy and democratic
countries cannot be investigated over their army’s
involvement in the death of civilians.
This
was, in fact,
the gist of the statement
produced by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu’s office in June 2010, soon after Israeli
army commandos intercepted a humanitarian aid
flotilla on its way to Gaza and killed ten unarmed
activists in international waters.
Israel is
an Occupying Power under international law and is
held accountable to the Fourth Geneva Convention.
The international community is legally obliged to
examine Israel’s conduct against Palestinian
civilians and, needless to say, against unarmed
civilians in international waters.
Israel’s
record of investigating itself, aside from being
spun to praise Israel’s moral superiority, has never
been of any help for Palestinians.
In fact,
the entire Israeli justice system is systematically
unjust to occupied Palestinians.
The
Israeli rights group
Yesh Din reported
that out “of the 186 criminal investigations opened
by the Israeli army into suspected offenses against
Palestinians in 2015, just four yielded
indictments.” Such indictments rarely yield prison
sentences.
The
recent indictment
of Israeli soldier, Elor Azarya, sentencing him to a
now postponed term
of 18 months in prison for the killing in cold blood
of an alleged Palestinian attacker is an exception,
not the norm. It has been years since an Israeli
soldier was sentenced. In fact, several thousand
Palestinian civilians have been killed between the
last time a “manslaughter”
conviction was handed down to an Israeli soldier in
2005 and Azarya’s
indictment.
Azarya, now
perceived by many Israelis as a hero, has received
such a light punishment that it is less than that of
a Palestinian child throwing rocks at an Israeli
occupation soldier.
Some United
Nations officials, although powerless before the US
backing of Israel, are furious.
The
18-month verdict “also stands in contrast to the
sentences handed down by other Israeli courts for
other less serious offenses, notably the sentencing
of Palestinian children to more than three years’
imprisonment for throwing stones at cars,” UN human
rights spokeswoman,
Ravina Shamdasani,
said in response to the Israeli court decision.
While
pro-Israel social media activists and media pundits
went on to praise the supposedly unmatched Israeli
democracy, a campaign in Israel to pardon Azarya
continues to garner momentum. Prime Minister
Netanyahu is already on board.
Not only is
the Israeli justice system unjust to Palestinians,
it was never intended to be so. A careful reading of
the recent comptroller’s remarks and findings would
clarify that the intent was never to examine war
against a besieged nation as a moral concept, but
the government’s inability to win the war more
effectively: the breakdown of intelligence;
Netanyahu’s lack of political inclusiveness; the
death of an unprecedented number of Israeli
soldiers.
Israel’s appetite for war is, in fact, at an
all-time high. Some
commentators are arguing
that Israel might launch yet another war so as to
redeem its “mistakes” in the previous one, as stated
in the report.
But war
itself is a staple for Israel. Hard-hitting Israeli
journalist Gideon Levy’s reaction to the
comptroller’s report says it best. He argued that
the report is almost a plagiarized copy of the
“Winograd Commission Report” which followed the 2006
Second Lebanon War.
All
wars since 1948 “could have been avoided”,
Levy wrote in Haaretz.
But they were not, frankly, because “Israel loves
wars. Needs them. Does nothing to prevent them and,
sometimes, instigates them.”
This is the
only way to read the latest report, but also all
such reports, when war is used as a tool of control,
to “downgrade” the defenses of a besieged enemy, to
create distraction from political corruption, to
help politicians win popular support, to play, time
and again, the role of the embattled victim, and
many other pretenses.
As for
Palestinians, who are neither capable of instigated
or sustaining a war, they can only put up a fight,
real or symbolic, whenever Israel decides to go for
yet another bloody, avoidable war.
No matter
the outcome, Israel will boast of its military
superiority, unmatched intelligence, transparent
democracy and moral ascendancy; the US, Britain,
France and other Europeans will enthusiastically
agree, issuing Israel another blank check to “defend
itself” by any means.
Meanwhile,
any attempt at investigating Israeli conduct will be
thwarted, for Israel is a “democracy” and, for some
reason, self-proclaimed democracies cannot be
investigated. Only their sham investigations matter;
only their dead count.
Dr. Ramzy Baroud has been writing about the Middle
East for over 20 years. He is an
internationally-syndicated columnist, a media
consultant, an author of several books and the
founder of PalestineChronicle.com. His books include
“Searching Jenin”, “The Second Palestinian Intifada”
and his latest “My Father Was a Freedom Fighter:
Gaza’s Untold Story”. His website is
www.ramzybaroud.net.
The
views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect the opinions of Information Clearing
House.
|