Obamagate
Wiretaps May Have Started When Bill Clinton Secretly
Met With Loretta Lynch
Was Arizona airport tarmac meeting between Bill
Clinton and Loretta Lynch the beginning of Obamagate
leaks?
By Alex Christoforou
March 08, 2017
"Information
Clearing House"
-
How much did Hillary Clinton know,
regarding the Trump Tower wiretaps and FISA warrants
(assuming
they existed)?
What we know: The first FISA
request came right after former Attorney
General Loretta Lynch met with Bill Clinton on the
airport tarmac in Phoenix Arizona on June of 2016.
The first FISA request was denied.
A week later FBI Director James Comey exonerated
Hillary Clinton from further investigation saying…
“Our judgment is that no reasonable
prosecutor would bring such a case.”
We also know (via various news reports) that
a second FISA request was submitted in October of
2016 just before the US elections.
On October 31st, then Presidential candidate
Hillary Clinton sent out a tweet saying that
‘computer scientists have uncovered a covert server
linking the Trump organization to a Russian-based
server’.
Was Hillary Clinton tipped off to the wiretapping
right before to the November 8th election?
More via
The Gateway Pundit…
We now know that the meeting between Bill
Clinton and Attorney General Lynch occurred at
about the same time that the Obama
administration filed a request with the Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA) to
monitor communications involving Donald Trump
and several advisers.
Fast forward to October 2016. Wikileaks
began releasing emails of Clinton campaign chair
John Podesta, rolling out batches every day
until the election, creating new mini-scandals.
These emails were virtually ignored by the
mainstream media who were in the bag for
Democrat Hillary Clinton but were spread widely
by websites that chose to share the truth like
this one.
At the same time, The Obama administration
submitted a new, narrow request to the FISA
court, now focused on a computer server in Trump
Tower suspected of links to Russian banks.
No evidence is found —
but the
wiretaps continued, ostensibly for national
security reasons, Andrew McCarthy at National
Review later
notes.
The Obama administration
was monitoring an opposing presidential campaign
using the high-tech surveillance powers of the
federal intelligence services.
At about this same time the leaks started
coming.
Liberal website Slate
posted a report on
October 31st titled: Was a Trump Server
Communicating With Russia? The subtitle to
the post read: “This spring, a group of
computer scientists set out to determine whether
hackers were interfering with the Trump
campaign. They found something they weren’t
expecting.”
The article shared a story of innocent
‘anonymous’ hackers who went searched the net
and found the following:
In late July, one of these scientists—who
asked to be referred to as Tea Leaves, a
pseudonym that would protect his relationship
with the networks and banks that employ him to
sift their data—found what looked like malware
emanating from Russia. The destination domain
had Trump in its name, which of course attracted
Tea Leaves’ attention. But his discovery of the
data was pure happenstance—a surprising needle
in a large haystack of DNS lookups on his
screen. “I have an outlier here that connects to
Russia in a strange way,” he wrote in his notes.
He couldn’t quite figure it out at first. But
what he saw was a bank in Moscow that kept
irregularly pinging a server registered to the
Trump Organization on Fifth Avenue.
|
Break
Free From The Matrix
|
The creative article went on to try and paint
a connection with now President Trump:
The researchers had initially stumbled in
their diagnosis because of the odd configuration
of Trump’s server. “I’ve never seen a server set
up like that,” says
Christopher Davis, who runs the
cybersecurity firm HYAS InfoSec Inc. and won a
FBI Director Award for Excellence for his work
tracking down the authors of one of the world’s
nastiest
botnet
attacks. “It looked weird, and it didn’t pass
the sniff test.” The server was first registered
to Trump’s business in 2009 and was set up to
run consumer marketing campaigns. It had a
history of sending mass emails on behalf of
Trump-branded properties and products.
Researchers were ultimately convinced that the
server indeed belonged to Trump. (Click
here
to see the server’s registration record.) But
now this capacious server handled a strangely
small load of traffic, such a small load that it
would be hard for a company to justify the
expense and trouble it would take to maintain
it. “I get more mail in a day than the server
handled,” Davis says.
Here is Hillary Clinton’s tweet from October
31st…
The Gateway Pundit further adds…
Connect the dots, folks. This was a well
coordinated attack on a Presidential candidate.
AG Lynch met with Bill Clinton just before the
first FISA request.
After they were successful with the second
FISA request in October, it appears Bill Clinton
passed on the information to his wife to help
her win the election. This scandal is about to
blow wide open; it’s not going away any time
soon. Stay tuned…
The
views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect the opinions of Information Clearing
House.
|
