Transcript
SHARMINI PERIES: It’s The Real News Network. I’m
Sharmini Peries, coming to you from Baltimore.
The
latest economic indicator showed that the Greek
economy shrank by 0.4% in the last three months
of 2016. This poses a real problem for Greece,
because its lenders are expecting it to grow by
3.5% annually, to enable it to pay back on its
bailout loan. Greece is scheduled to make a 10.5
billion euro payment on its debt next summer,
but is expected to be unable to make that
payment, without another installment from its
$86 billion bailout.
A
growing impasse between the International
Monetary Fund, and the European Central Bank,
Greece’s two main lenders, is threatening to
push Greece into default, and pull out of the
euro. Meanwhile, the Greece government told its
lenders, that we now call “Troika” today, that
it will not agree to any more austerity
measures. Here’s what the government
spokesperson told the press on Thursday.
GREEK
SPOKESMAN: (Greek)
SHARMINI PERIES: Joining us today, to take a
closer look at the Greek situation is Michael
Hudson. Michael is a distinguished Professor of
Economics, at the University of Missouri, Kansas
City. He’s the author of many books, and the
latest among them is, J is for Junk Economics: A
Guide to Reality in the Age of Deception.
Thank
you so much for joining us today, Michael.
MICHAEL
HUDSON: It’s good to be here. But I take issue
with one thing that you said. You said the
lenders expect Greece to grow. That is not so.
There is no way in which the lenders did expect
Greece to grow. In fact, the IMF was the main
lender. It said that Greece cannot grow, under
the circumstances that it has now.
What do
you do in a case where you make a loan to a
country, and the entire staff says that there is
no way this country can repay the loan? That is
what the IMF staff said in 2015. It made the
loan anyway – not to Greece, but to pay French
banks, German banks and a few other bondholders
– not a penny actually went to Greece. The junk
economics they used claimed to have a program to
make sure the IMF would help manage the Greek
economy to enable it to repay. Unfortunately,
their secret ingredient was austerity.
Sharmini, for the last 50 years, every austerity
program that the IMF has made has shrunk the
victim economy. No austerity program has ever
helped an economy grow. No budget surplus has
ever helped an economy grow, because a budget
surplus sucks money out of the economy. As for
the conditionalities, the so-called reforms,
they are an Orwellian term for anti-reform, for
cutting back pensions and rolling back the
progress that the labor movement has made in the
last half century. So, the lenders knew very
well that Greece would not grow, and that it
would shrink.
So, the
question is, why does this junk economics
continue, decade after decade? The reason is
that the loans are made to Greece precisely
because Greece couldn’t pay. When a country
can’t pay, the rules at the IMF and EU and the
German bankers behind it say, don’t worry, we
will simply insist that you sell off your public
domain. Sell off your land, your transportation,
your ports, your electric utilities. This is by
now a program that has gone on and on, decade
after decade.
Now,
surprisingly enough, America’s ambassador to the
EU, Ted Malloch, has gone on Bloomberg and also
on Greek TV telling the Greeks to leave the euro
and go it alone. You have Trump’s nominee for
the ambassador to the EU saying that the EU zone
is dead zone. It’s going to shrink. If Greece
continues to repay the loan, if it does not
withdraw from the euro, then it is going to be
in a permanent depression, as far as the eye can
see.
Greece
is suffering the result of these bad loans. It
is already in a longer depression today, a
deeper depression, than it was in the 1930s.
SHARMINI PERIES: Yeah, that’s an important… at
the very beginning of your answer here, you were
making this very important point, is that
although the lenders – this is the Eurozone
lenders – had set a target of 3.5% surplus as a
condition on Greece in order to make that first
bailout loan. The IMF is saying, well, that’s
not quite doable, 1.5% should be the target.
But
you’re saying, neither of these are real, or is
achievable, or desired, for that matter, because
they actually want Greece to fail. Why are you
saying that?
MICHAEL
HUDSON: Because when Greece fails, that’s a
success for the foreign investors that want to
buy the Greek railroads. They want to take over
the ports. They want to take over the land. They
want the tourist sites. But most of all, they
want to set an example of Greece, to show that
France, the Netherlands or other countries that
may think of withdrawing from the euro –
withdraw and decide they would rather grow than
be impoverished – that the IMF and EU will do to
them just what they’re doing to Greece.
So
they’re making an example of Greece. They’re
going to show that finance rules, and in fact
that is why both Trump and Ted Malloch have come
up in support of the separatist movement in
France. They’re supporting Marine Le Pen, just
as Putin is supporting Marine Le Pen. There’s a
perception throughout the world that finance
really is a mode of warfare.
If they
can convince countries somehow to adopt junk
economics and pursue policies that will destroy
themselves, then they’ll be easy pickings for
foreign investors, and for the globalists to
take over other economies. So, it’s a form of
war.
SHARMINI PERIES: Right. Michael, you were saying
that the newly appointed ambassador, Ted Malloch
of the Trump administration to the European
Union has suggested that Greece should consider
leaving the European Union, or the euro in
particular.
What do
you make of this, and will this be then
consistent with what Greece is suggesting?
Because Greece has now said, no more austerity
measures. We’re not going to agree to them. So,
this is going to amount to an impasse that is
not going to be resolvable. Should Greece exit
the euro?
MICHAEL
HUDSON: Yes, it should, but the question is how
should it do it, and on what terms? The problem
is not only leaving the euro. The problem really
is the foreign debt that was bad debt that it
was loaded onto by the Eurozone. If you leave
the euro and still pay the foreign debt, then
you’re still in a permanent depression from
which you can never exit.
There’s
a broad moral principle here: If you lend money
to a country that your statistics show cannot
pay the debt, is there really a moral obligation
to pay the debt? Greece did have a commission
two years ago saying that this debt is odious.
But it’s not enough just to say there’s an
odious debt. You have to have something more
positive.
I’ve
been talking to Greek politicians and Syriza
leaders about what’s needed, and what is needed
is a Declaration of Rights. Just as the
Westphalia rules in 1648, a Universal
Declaration that countries should not be
attacked in war, that countries should not be
overthrown by other countries. I think, the
Declaration of International Law has to realize
that no country should be obliged to impose
poverty on its population, and sell off the
public domain in order to pay its foreign
creditors.
The
Declaration would say that if creditors make a
debt that cannot be repaid, the debt is by
definition odious, so there is no need to pay
it. Every country has the right not to pay debts
that are unpayable except by bankrupting the
country, and forcing it to sell off their public
domain to foreign countries. That’s the very
definition of sovereignty.
So, I’m
hoping to work with politicians of a number of
countries to draw up this Declaration of Debtor
Rights. That’s what’s been missing. There’s an
idea that if you withdraw from the euro, you can
devalue your currency and can lower labor
standards even further, wipe out the pensions,
and somehow squeeze out enough to pay the debt.
So, the
problem isn’t only the Eurozone. True, joining
the euro meant that you’re not allowed to run a
budget deficit to pump money into the economy to
recover – like America has done. But the looming
problem is that you have to pay debts that are
so far beyond your ability to pay that you’ll
end up like Haiti did after it rebelled after
the French Revolution.
France
said, sure, we’ll give you your independence,
but you’ll have to reimburse us, for the fact
that we no longer hold you as slaves. You have
to buy your freedom. You can’t say slavery is
wrong. You have to make us, the slaveholders,
whole. So Haiti took this huge foreign debt to
France after it got its independence, and ended
up not being able to develop.
A few
years after that, in 1824, Greece had a
revolution and found the same problem. It
borrowed from the Ricardo brothers, the brothers
of David Ricardo, the economist and lobbyist for
the bankers in London. Just like the IMF, he
said that any country can afford to repay its
debts, because of automatic stabilization.
Ricardo came out with a junk economics theory
that is still held by the IMF and the European
Union today, saying that indebted countries can
automatically pay.
Well,
Greece ended up paying… taking on an enormous
debt, paying interest but still defaulting again
and again. Each time it had to give up more
sovereignty. The result was basically a constant
depression. Slow growth is what retarded Greece
and much of the rest of southern Europe.
So
unless they tackle the debt problem, membership
in the Eurozone or the European Union is really
secondary.
SHARMINI PERIES: All right. There’s so much more
we can get into. For example, how much of Greece
has already been sold out in the fire sale in
order to service the debt. But let’s talk about
that in another segment.
Thank
you so much for joining us, Michael.
MICHAEL
HUDSON: Good to be here, Sharmini.
SHARMINI PERIES: And thank you for joining us on
The Real News Network.
Michael Hudson is President of The Institute for
the Study of Long-Term Economic Trends (ISLET),
a Wall Street Financial Analyst, Distinguished
Research Professor of Economics at the
University of Missouri, Kansas City and author
of
Killing the Host (2015), The
Bubble and Beyond (2012),
Super-Imperialism: The Economic Strategy of
American Empire (1968 & 2003), Trade,
Development and Foreign Debt (1992 & 2009) and
of The Myth of Aid (1971), amongst
many others.
Michael acts as an economic advisor to
governments worldwide including Iceland, Latvia
and China on finance and tax law. He gives
presentations on various topics at conferences
and meetings and can be
booked here.
Listen to some of his
many radio interviews
to hear his hyperspeed analysis of the
geo-political machinations of global economics.
http://michael-hudson.com
The views expressed in this article are solely
those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect the opinions of Information Clearing
House.
It is unacceptable to slander, smear or engage in personal attacks on authors of articles posted on ICH.
Those engaging in that behavior will be banned from the comment section.
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)