Here's How the
Trump Presidency Will Play Out
By Pepe Escobar
January 20, 2017 "Information
Clearing House"
- "Sputnik"-
The Trump era starts now –
with geopolitics and geoeconomics set for a series of
imminent, unpredictable cliffhangers.
I
have argued that Trump's foreign policy guru Henry
Kissinger's strategy to deal with the formidable Eurasia
integration trio – Russia, China and Iran — is a remixed
Divide and Rule; seduce Russia away from its strategic
partnership with China, while keep harassing the weakest
link, Iran.
In fact that's how
it's already playing out – as in the outbursts
of selected members of Trump's cabinet during their US
Senate hearings. Factions of US Think Tankland,
referring to Nixon's China policy, which was designed
by Kissinger, are also excited with the possibilities
of containment regarding at least one of those powers
"potentially arrayed against America".
Kissinger and
Dr. Zbig "Grand Chessboard" Brzezinski are the two
foremost, self-described Western dalangs – puppet
masters – in the geopolitical arena. In opposition
to Kissinger, Obama's foreign policy mentor Brzezinski,
true to his Russophobia, proposes a Divide and Rule
centered on seducing China.
Yet an
influential New York business source, very close to the
real, discreet Masters of the Universe, who correctly
predicted Trump's victory weeks before the fact,
after examining my argument offered not only a scathing
appraisal of those cherished dalangs; he volunteered
to detail how the new normal was laid out by the Masters
directly to Trump. Let's call him "X".
The
non-stop China watch
"X" starts
by doing something US deep state-connected regulars, who
revere their idols, never dare to, at least in public:
"It is important not to attribute too much importance
to either Kissinger or Brzezinski as they are merely
fronts for those who make the decisions and it is their
job to cloak the decisions with a patina
of intellectuality. Their input means relatively
nothing. I use their names on occasion as I cannot use
the names of those who actually make the decisions."
That's the cue
for "X" to detail the new normal: "Trump was elected
with the support of the Masters to tilt towards Russia.
The Masters have their tools in the media and Congress
maintaining a vilification campaign against Russia, and
have their puppet Brzezinski also come out against
Russia, stating 'America's global influence depends
on cooperation with China'. The purpose is to threaten
Russia to cooperate and place these chips on the
negotiating table for Trump. In a traditional good
cop-bad cop approach, Donald is portrayed as the good
cop wanting good relations with Russia, and Congress,
media, Brzezinski are the bad cops. This is to aid Trump
in the negotiations with Russia as Putin sees the
'precarious' position of his friend and should be
willing to make major concessions as the line goes."
And that brings us
to how Taiwan – and Japan – got into the mix: "Donald
shows the Russian tilt by talking to the Taiwanese,
demonstrating that the shift is serious. But it was
decided to throw Japan into the mix as a predator
against US industry, with an attack on Toyota,
thoroughly deserved. That moderated the position as the
Masters became afraid that the perception of our
building up Japan against China would be too much of a
provocation."
So expect China
– as "not too much importance" Kissinger prescribed —
to be under non-stop scrutiny: "The Masters have decided
to reindustrialize the United States and want to take
jobs back from China. This is advisable from the Chinese
viewpoint; for why should they sell their work to the US
for a dollar that has no intrinsic value and get really
nothing back for the work. China should have a car
in every Chinese worker's garage and they will become a
larger producer of cars than the EU, US and Japan
combined, and their own nation will keep their wealth
in their own country."
And why China
over Russia? "Russia in this sense being a natural
resource country with a gigantic military industrial
complex (the latter being the only reason she is
secretly respected) is exempt from any tough trade talk
as they hardly export anything but natural resources and
military equipment. The Masters want jobs back
from Mexico and Asia including Japan, Taiwan, etc., and
you see this in Trump's attack on Japan. The main
underlying reason is that the US has lost control of the
seas and cannot secure its military components during a
major war. This is all that matters now and this is the
giant story behind the scenes."
In only a few
words "X" details the reversal of an economic cycle:
"The Masters made money out of transfer of industry
to Asia (Bain Capital specialized in this), and Wall
Street made money from the lower interest rates on the
recycled dollars from the trade deficits. But now, the
issue is strategic; and they will make money on the
return of industries scaling down their investments
in Asia and returning them to the United States as we
rebuild production here."
"X" remains
quite fond of Henry Ford's business strategy; and that
is the cue for him to address the crucial theme:
national defense. According to "X", "Ford doubled the
wages he paid and made more money than any other
manufacturer. The reason was that a living wage where
the mother can have many children on her husband's wage
was psychologically good for productivity in his car
plants, and that his workers could then afford his cars.
He thus recognized that in a society there must be a
just distribution of wealth that his admirer Steve Jobs
could not.
Henry's mass
productivity was the wonder of the world and that was
what won World War Two for the United States. Amazon
does not contribute anything to national defense, being
merely an internet marketing service based on computer
programs, nor Google which merely organizes data better.
None of this builds a better missile or submarine
except in a marginal way."
It's
the Pentagon, stupid
So yes; this
all has to do with reorganizing the US military. "X"
made a point to refer to a
CNAS report I quoted in my initial column: "It is
very important for what is visible between the lines.
And that is we are in deep trouble being technologically
behind Russia by generations in weapons, which is a
follow-up on the Brzezinski quote that we are no longer
a global power."
© Sputnik /
Dmitriy Vinogradov
This is a
thorough, wide-ranging
analysis
of how Russia has
managed to organize the best armed forces in the world.
And that does not even take into account the S-500
missile defense system, which is now being rolled
out and arguably seals the entirety of Russian airspace.
And the next generation — S-600? – will be even more
powerful.
"X" does
venture into deep state taboo territory, as in how
Russia, over the past decade, has managed to leap far
ahead of the US, "eclipsing it as the strongest military
power". But the game may be far from over – wishful
thinking or otherwise: "We hope Secretary of Defense
James Mattis will understand this and that the Deputy
Secretary of Defense has advanced technological skills,
organizational ability and the foresight to understand
that the weapons of World War Three are offensive and
defensive missiles, and submarines, and not air power,
tanks and aircraft carriers."
A realist, "X"
admits that the warmongering neocon/neoliberalcon status
quo – represented by most US deep state factions – will
never abandon the default posture of unremitting
hostility towards Russia. But he prefers to focus
on change: "Let Tillerson reorganize the State
Department along Exxon efficiencies. He may be worth
something in that. He and Mattis may be gutless but if
you tell the truth to the Senate you may not be
confirmed. So what they say means nothing. But notice
this about Libya. The CIA had a goal of driving China
out of Africa and so does AFRICOM. That was one of the
secrets to our Libyan intervention."
Not that it
worked; NATO/AFRICOM turned Libya into a wasteland run
by militias, and still China was not driven away
from the rest of Africa.
"X" also admits:
"Syria and Iran are red lines for Russia. So is the
eastern Ukraine from the Dnieper." He is fully aware
Moscow will not allow any regime change gambit
on Tehran. And he's also aware that "China's investments
in Iranian oil and gas imply that China also will not
permit Washington's overthrow of the Iranian
government."
The going
really gets tough when it comes to NATO; "X" is
convinced Russia "will invade Romania and Poland if
those missiles are not taken out of Romania and the
missile commitment to Poland rescinded. The issue is not
the worthless defensive missiles of the United States
but the substitutability of offensive nuclear missiles
in these silos. Russia will not tolerate this risk.
These are not subject to negotiation."
© Sputnik /
Maksim Bogovid
In contrast to the
"perpetual threat" perpetual propaganda by the US War
Party, Moscow focuses on actual facts on the ground
since the 1990s; the break up of historic Slavic ally
Serbia; Warsaw Pact nations and even former USSR
republics annexed by NATO, not to mention attempts
to also include Georgia and Ukraine; US deployment
of color revolutions; the "Assad must go" fiasco, as in
regime change forced on Syria even including the
weaponizing of Salafi-jihadis; economic sanctions, an
oil price war and raids on the ruble; and non-stop NATO
harassment.
"X", fully
aware of the facts, adds, "Russia has always wanted
peace. But they are not going to play a game with the
Masters of the Universe that has Trump as the good guy
and the Congress, CIA, etc. as the bad guy as a
negotiating ploy. That is how they see it. They do not
regard this circus as real."
The circus may
be just an illusion. Or wayang – Balinese puppet
theatre — as I suggested. "X" advances a crisp
interpretation of the shadow play ahead from Moscow's
point of view, allowing "several months to see if Putin
can work out a detente with Trump that essentially
creates an autonomous eastern Ukraine, a peace treaty
in Syria with Assad in place, and a withdrawal of NATO
forces back to their line of defense under Ronald
Reagan."
Who will
prevail; the Masters, or the deep state? Brace
for impact. |