John Lewis, Donald Trump and the demise of the “civil
rights” establishment
By Patrick Martin
January 17, 2017 "Information
Clearing House"
- "WSWS"
-
In an interview
conducted Friday for NBC’s Sunday morning program “Meet
the Press,” Democratic Representative John Lewis
announced that he would boycott the inauguration of
President Donald Trump because, “I don’t see this
president-elect as a legitimate president.”
There are many
reasons to reject and oppose the presidency of Donald
Trump: he personifies the financial oligarchy that now
dominates the US political system and seeks to
subordinate all public policy to its mad drive to amass
ever-greater wealth; he has filled his cabinet and White
House staff with ultra-right ideologues, fellow
billionaires and ex-generals; his government is
committed to a program of drastic cuts in spending for
education, health care and other public services,
combined with a massive military buildup.
Lewis, however,
mentioned none of these things. He based his rejection
of Trump on the report by US intelligence agencies about
Russian hacking during the 2016 presidential election
campaign. “I think the Russians participated in helping
this man get elected, and they helped destroy the
candidacy of Hillary Clinton,” he said. “That’s not
right. That’s not fair. That’s not the open democratic
process.”
No evidence has
been presented proving that the Russian government was
responsible for hacking the Democratic National
Committee and the Clinton campaign. The hue and cry over
Russian hacking has two purposes: to conceal the actual
content of the leaked emails, which showed the
right-wing and antidemocratic character of the Clinton
campaign, and to whip up public opinion in the United
States in favor of political, economic, diplomatic and
ultimately military “retaliation” against Russia.
There is not
the slightest genuine democratic content to Lewis’s
critique of Trump. He did not cite Trump’s loss of the
popular vote by nearly three million votes, or the
impact of voter ID laws enacted by many
Republican-controlled state governments to suppress
minority voting. His attack on Trump consisted solely of
embracing the CIA-led anti-Russian campaign in language
reminiscent of the 1950s redbaiter Joseph McCarthy.
There is a grim
historical irony here. During the years of the most
intense struggles for civil rights in the South, in the
1950s and 1960s, the FBI, the police in cities like
Birmingham, Alabama, and the southern Democratic
politicians all claimed that protests against
segregation were the work of “outside agitators,”
communists sent in to do the bidding of the Soviet
Union. But John Lewis, who played a significant role as
a student leader during those years and led the march
for voting rights from Selma to Montgomery, Alabama, has
remembered only one thing: denouncing your opponents as
tools of Russia is a proven propaganda tactic.
A congressman
from Atlanta for the past 30 years, Lewis personifies
the recruitment and corruption of a section of
middle-class African-Americans to reinforce the
domination of capitalist politics. Civil rights leaders
like Lewis were co-opted as part of a conscious strategy
of the US ruling elite to refurbish the Democratic Party
and the state machinery as a whole.
Dozens of major
cities were turned over to African-American mayors, some
of them veterans of the civil rights struggles, others
merely cashing in on it. The Congressional Black Caucus
expanded its number from a handful to more than thirty.
With the assistance of programs like affirmative action,
slots were created for black academics, government
officials, military officers, corporate executives and
ultimately CEOs.
These positions
were not very numerous, but they were well paid,
politically symbolic and gave a cover of “diversity” for
the depredations of American big business and the crimes
of the Pentagon. US imperialism incinerated tens of
thousands of defenseless Iraqi conscripts while General
Colin Powell, the first black chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff, briefed the press on the progress of
the 1991 Persian Gulf War. In similar fashion, Powell,
as the first black secretary of state, and Condoleezza
Rice, the first black female national security adviser,
were at George W. Bush’s side when he launched the
illegal 2003 invasion of Iraq.
This process
culminated in the election of Barack Obama, the first
African-American president—also the first president to
assert the right to assassinate American citizens, using
drone-fired missiles, anywhere in the world. Obama, a
creature of the military-intelligence apparatus,
expanded the war in Afghanistan, launched a new war in
Libya and engaged the US military once again in war in
Iraq and Syria. He continued and strengthened the police
state operations of the CIA, the FBI and the National
Security Agency.
It is
noteworthy—and characteristic of this corrupt layer of
African-American Democratic politicians—that John Lewis
has never opposed the military-intelligence operations
of the Obama administration. On the contrary, Lewis
received the Presidential Medal of Freedom from Obama in
2011, the same year Obama authorized the drone-missile
assassination of Anwar al-Awlaki, an American citizen.
Some 50 years
ago, Martin Luther King Jr. made a critical step forward
when he sought to combine the struggle for democratic
rights at home with opposition to imperialist war
abroad, courageously coming out against the war in
Vietnam. There is not a shred of such principle among
those who today seek to wrap themselves in King’s mantle
in order to cover their own right-wing politics.
After Dr.
King’s assassination in April 1968—an event that was
undoubtedly linked to his turn against the Vietnam
War—his acolytes made their peace with the
establishment. Some of them, like Andrew Young, who had
always stood on the right wing in King’s councils,
became open apologists for US imperialism, with Young
serving as US ambassador to the United Nations in the
Carter administration.
Others, like
Jesse Jackson, Julian Bond and John Lewis, became
political hacks for the Democratic Party, giving this
party of big business a “progressive” cover as it moved
further and further to the right. Lewis also served in
the Carter administration, running several antipoverty
programs, before winning a congressional seat in 1986.
In recent years, he has cashed in quite literally on his
role in the 1960s, with his Faith and Politics Institute
selling seats to lobbyists for $25,000 apiece to his
annual visit to Selma to reenact the 1965 march.
The enlistment
of Lewis in the warmongering anti-Russian campaign only
underscores the political challenge facing the American
working class. No section of the Democratic Party will
conduct a genuine or principled struggle against the
monstrous right-wing program of the Trump administration
and the Republican Congress. The Democratic Party, like
the Republicans, defends the profits and wealth of the
financial aristocracy and the global interests of
American imperialism.
It is unacceptable to slander, smear or engage in personal attacks on authors of articles posted on ICH.
Those engaging in that behavior will be banned from the comment section.
In accordance
with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational
purposes. Information Clearing House has no
affiliation whatsoever with the originator of
this article nor is Information ClearingHouse
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)