Ten Aircraft
Carriers Aligned in a Row
By Paul Craig Roberts
January 12, 2017 "Information
Clearing House"
- Readers have asked me why 10 of 11 US aircraft
carriers are lined up in a row in dock allegedly for
maintanence. It reminds them of the battleships at Pearl
Harbor. Readers ask if this could be an indication that
the Deep State is planning a false flag attack on the
carriers, as was carried out on the World Trade Center
and Pentagon in order to get the US at war with the
independent Muslim world, this time in order to get the
US at war with Russia before Trump can restore normal
relations.
I don’t think so. The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor
was real, if provoked. The deception apparently was in
the fact that Washington had warning but did not share
it with the US Navy in Pearl Harbor. The Battleships
were outmoded weapons, and the aircraft carriers had
been removed. It would be extremely difficult to blame a
false flag attack on US aircraft carriers on Russia.
Indeed, if Russia wants to attack the US, the target
would not be obsolete weapons such as aircraft carriers.
According to what I have been told by former(?)
intelligence officers, the aircraft carriers are in dock
so that their copper wiring can be replaced by fiber
optics. Apparently, the Russians have the capability to
shut down the operating systems of our ships and
aircraft that are copper wired. In behalf of this
conclusion, there were news reports that a missile ship
Washington sent to impress the Russian naval base in
Crimea had all its systems shut down by the overflight
of one Russian jet. According to another news report,
two Israeli US jet fighters were sent to express
disobdience to Russia’s controlled airspace in Syria.
The Russians asked the Israelis to leave, and when they
did not, the Russians shut down the fire control and
communication systems of their aircraft.
According to what I have been told, the Russians
discovered that copper wiring permits them to disrupt
the operating systems with certain radar frequencies
built into their air control systems
If this account is true, and I lack the technical
expertise to judge what I have been told, we are
presented with a test case of what we are told are
Russian and Chinese aggressive intentions against the
West. With the US carrier task forces inoperative, this
is a prime time for Russia to seize Ukraine and whatever
else they are alleged to want, and it is a prime time
for China to take Taiwan and Japan if they want it.
There is no American Navy to deploy to stop them, and a
nuclear threat from the clowns in Washington would mean
nothing other than the complete destruction of the
entire Western world, with the moronic idiots in
Washington being the first to go.
The charges of Chinese and Russian aggression are
fantastic lies. China has not declared the Gulf of
Mexico or the seas off the California coasts to be
“areas of Chinese national interest,” but the killer
bitch Hillary in the regime of the Nobel Peace Laureate
declared the South China Sea to be “an area of US
national interest.” This is provocation beyond
provocation. No intelligent diplomat would ever make
such a ridiculous and provocative claim.
Russia conquered Georgia in response to Georgia’s
invasion of South Ossetia, but released it and did not
reincorporate the former Russian province back into the
Russian Federation where it had resided for 300 years.
Russia refused the requests for reincorporation from the
Donetsk and Luhansk breakaway republics in Ukraine.
Russia has not declared the Baltics and Eastern Europe
to be areas of Russian national interest, but the US has
and has incorporated them into Washington’s mercenary
army, stationing troops, tanks, and missiles there with
which to attack Russia. Russia has not responded in
kind.
All of the aggression in the world stems from
Washington. This is plain as day. How come so few see
the obvious? Who else but Washington has been at war
since the Clinton regime murdering people in nine
countries?
Why is the entire liberal-progressive-left helping the
entrenched CIA Establishment demonize president-elect
Donald Trump, whose stated goal is to normalize
relations with Russia? Is this an indication that the
liberal-progressive-left is a CIA front? This
possibility is not far-fetched. As it is a known fact
that the CIA owns the American and European print and TV
media, why would the CIA ignore the liberal-left
“progressive” Internet media?
The rule is that “the enemy of my enemy is my friend.”
Clearly the Establishment enemy of the liberal-left is
Trump’s enemy, so why is the liberal-left allied with
its Establishment enemy against Trump?
The real question is: Does the US really have an
independent liberal-left?
If so, where is it? The liberal-progressive-left has
served as protectors of the fake 9/11 official story
that a few Saudis uninformed by an intelligence service
or a state apparatus outwitted all 16 US intelligence
agencies, the National Security Council, the Pentagon,
airport security, air traffic control, the US Air Force
and Dick Cheney himself, along with Israel’s Mossad and
all the intelligence services of the US Empire, and
inflicted the most humuliating defeat on an alleged
“superpower” in the entire history of the world.
Anyone stupid enough to believe the official 9/11 story
is not sufficiently intelligent to be qualified to be
left-wing or even a sentinent being.
What the Western world hurtling to its destruction
desperately needs is a real left-wing, a left-wing
immune to emotional disabilities that blind it to
reality.
Dr. Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant
Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and
associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was
columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News
Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many
university appointments. His internet columns have
attracted a worldwide following. Roberts' latest books
are
The Failure of
Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the
West,
How America Was
Lost,
and
The
Neoconservative Threat to World Order.
The views
expressed in this article are the author's own and do
not necessarily reflect Information Clearing House
editorial policy. |
